@iju5tdontknow@InsaneCope So if one is wrong, who is right? You could say Norway because they match the dictionary's definition, but who's defines the word in the dictionary? In 1989 the word "rape" wasn't even in it! So who defined rape then?
@iju5tdontknow@InsaneCope See, there needs to be a justification to expand or change what a word defines. Norway, found a justification, but the US didn't. Are they both right?
@iju5tdontknow@InsaneCope See, there needs to be a justification to expand or change what a word defines. Norway, found a justification, but the US didn't. Are they both right?
@iju5tdontknow@InsaneCope We broadened our definition too, but to consolidate forced Sodomy into it. They states use that definition as a base line, and expand from their.
@iju5tdontknow@InsaneCope I referred to the FBI because it has the closest definition to the true definition of the term "to rape." Other western countries had a similar definition, until recently when they broaden the definition away from the actual definition.
@iju5tdontknow@InsaneCope I do, that's why them redefining a word ceases to make it fact. Just because you feel like a word should mean something, doesn't make it so.
@iju5tdontknow@InsaneCope The only reason it was classified as "rape" was due to an amendment change. They define it as rape, but does that make it rape?
@iju5tdontknow@InsaneCope This is in Norway, and it still wasn't rape. They classified it as rape because they had literally just changed their legal definition.