One week into Vibely’s public beta.
250+ users 👥
380+ projects created 🛠️
685M+ AI tokens processed 🤖
₹0 spent on paid ads 💰
All through organic growth + SEO.
And https://t.co/sO0TfeV9qw is still in beta.
Thank you to everyone building with us.
Learn how to build websites with AI instead in https://t.co/7fdzLwROL6.
Find businesses without a website → build one with AI → offer it as a service.
This is where vibe coding gets interesting. 👀
#AI#VibeCoding#AITools#BuildInPublic
We built Vibely.
An AI app builder that turns your words into working websites and mobile apps.
No code.
No complicated setup.
Just tell Vibely what you want to build.
We’re live → https://t.co/7fdzLwRgVy
Let’s see what you build. 🚀
#Vibely#AI#BuildInPublic#AIAppBuilder
Building the product is becoming easier every day.
Distribution isn’t.
Anyone can build now. The real advantage is getting the right people to discover it, trust it, and keep using it.
Building is becoming a commodity. Distribution is the moat.
We just hit 700 users on https://t.co/sO0TfeV9qw
Still early, but seeing people actually build with something we created feels incredible.
No big launch.
No paid ads.
Just building, sharing, listening, and improving every day.
Next stop: 1,000.
I have a genuine question.
Anthropic has probably been working on Fable 5.1 for a very long time. OpenAI has probably been working on GPT-6 Astra for just as long. These labs are almost certainly building in parallel, not reacting to each other in real time of course.
So why does Fable 5.1 launch just a couple of days before Astra, and then Astra beats it on almost every benchmark by a good margin?
And this isn't a one-off.
Every single launch follows the same pattern: when Anthropic ships a new model, it beats all of OpenAI's previous models.
When OpenAI ships a new model, it beats all of Anthropic's previous models. Now they are actually beating what the other just launched days earlier.
Benchmarks are completely vanity metrics.