1. Patriots in Shadows- Historical fiction, Political, thriller
World War II. British India. A hidden war beneath the surface of the Empire.
As the Indian National Army of Subhas Chandra Bose advances toward India through the Indo-Burma border, sabotage, explosions, assassinations, and covert operations begin shaking the foundations of British rule. Arsenals burn. Military convoys vanish. Senior colonial officials collapse without explanation.
Inspired by real wartime events, this historical espionage thriller explores resistance, secrecy, and moral courage during the final years of the British Empire.
India: https://t.co/7Txh3t49FZ
Flipkart: https://t.co/ikrnK7WNBx
Astitva Store: https://t.co/tVpq3QgESw
Classic Shelf: https://t.co/BuvQPiFjrm
UK:https://t.co/s3ipuBU3Id
Australia: https://t.co/4JfJYTHYTs
USA: https://t.co/tAxnR1VzEG
2.1942: When the British Rule in India was threatened- Non-Fiction, deeply researched and analytical.
With Singapore fallen, Japanese forces advancing through Burma, and India suddenly exposed to war, the foundations of imperial rule faced unprecedented pressure. Political unrest, military threats, and global conflict converged to create one of the most dangerous moments in British imperial history.
Finalist in the IAN Book Awards, 1942 examines the political decisions, military campaigns, and rise of the Indian National Army that transformed the course of India’s freedom struggle and accelerated the collapse of the British Empire.
India:https://t.co/y9jGP91UNA
Flipkart: https://t.co/dlwxJ9al47
UK: https://t.co/CAFEdgz2YF
Australia:https://t.co/MTcOUH8mjb
United States: https://t.co/iGgRrBjQ37
Kobo:https://t.co/IQFEkjQFNZ
Google :https://t.co/pvzWUR5INB
Apple: https://t.co/5wC3OOwghz
These five Gentlemen have ruthlessly dismantled centuries of deception, distortion, and venom unleashed against Hindus by the entrenched Leftist and Islamist propaganda machinery.
Repost if you agree!
@ARanganathan72@jsaideepak@sanjeevsanyal@Vishnu_Jain1@vikramsampath
Embarrassment of the Week: ‘Islamophobic’ Killer Is Named… Yeah, You Guessed It
A Muslim was murdered outside an Eid service in Minneapolis last week, and initially, it was a story made to order for the left’s victimhood industry. It even seemed to be a genuine example of “Islamophobia,” which is as rare in real life as Nancy Pelosi stock losses. The far left’s propaganda arm, also known as the mainstream media, swung into action, and leftist politicians chimed in with the requisite displays of outrage and sorrow.
There was just one catch: when all the details came to light, the media narrative came crashing to the ground. Not that anyone involved admitted that or backtracked one inch, of course. As Mark Twain said long ago, the lie goes halfway around the world before the truth has finished tying its shoes, and in this case, as always, the lie served its purpose.
CrimeWatchMpls reported on X on May 27 that “A shooting took place in the parking lot at Canterbury Park, a Muslim event was scheduled to take place in the Expo Center at Canterbury.” Even though nothing had yet been revealed about the shooter, Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-Planned Parenthood), who is running for governor of Minnesota, hurried that evening to imply that the shooting was an instance of “Islamophobia”: “On this Eid al-Adha, I’m thinking of Minnesota’s Muslim community and all those gathered in prayer today, especially following today’s tragic shooting at an Eid prayer service at Canterbury Park. My thoughts are with the victim’s family and the entire community.”
CBS Minnesota published a story on May 28 that ran hard with the “Islamophobia” angle. In its lead paragraph, CBS highlighted the identity of the victim and the setting of the crime: “A suspect is in custody in connection to Wednesday morning’s shooting outside of a Twin Cities Eid al-Adha prayer service, which killed 26-year-old union leader Khalid Ibrahim Abdi.”
Driving its point home, CBS brought in Suleiman Adan, deputy executive director of the Minnesota chapter of the Hamas-linked Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR). What Adan said — “This is not just a headline for another story across people’s timelines, this is a family waking up to a reality no family should ever have to” — was innocuous enough, but just the fact that CAIR was invoked gave the strong impression that the murderer of Khalid Ibrahim Abdi was a racist, bigoted “Islamophobe.”
Aden reinforced that impression by saying that “people are paying close attention to the investigation,” as if a great injustice had been done to the Muslim community that its friends and protectors did not want to see authorities make even worse by failing to track down the killer or killers with dispatch and punish them to the full extent of the law.
Some time back I had started writing a blog on my web https://t.co/zzDhvvxdzR is the latest post where I attempt to explain why I wrote the fiction book Patriots in Shadows.
https://t.co/YaVwcx1s0q
Advance Review Copies:
I hope to publish 4 books in next one year.This includes both fiction and non fiction. Looking for 10 readers who can read these and post comments on sites like Amazon/Good reads and others.Books will be sent free in E book format.Comments are requested to be honest.
Looking for 10 people.
Form link https://t.co/A9Bs8ST5oH
1942 : When British Rule in India was threatened.
Five dents took place in this year.
1. The first dent in this aura of invincibility came when Britain itself came under threat by Luftwaffe bombing, the threat of invasion and naval blockades by U-2 Boats, and struggling for survival, lost Singapore, Malaya, Hongkong, and Burma in Asia.
The debacle of Singapore and Malaya in 1942 was a decisive loss to the British and demonstrated a poor strategy and inadequate fighting ability,
The areas from Hong Kong to Burma were very tightly linked with India when under the British.
The British officers were interchanged in these places with India.
Trade in Hong Kong, Singapore, Malaya, and Burma was substantially in the hands of Indian traders.
https://t.co/y9jGP91UNA
https://t.co/dlwxJ9al47
https://t.co/iGgRrBjQ37
AI generated indicative image
June 2nd 1947: The Plan for Partition
In his letter dated May 17th, 1947, to Mountbatten, Nehru made it clear that ‘The partition proposed is not of our seeking… we have agreed to certain territorial agreements because His Majesty’s Government. has apparently decided to hand over power only to a divided India.J.B.Kriplani said in sheer disgust ‘That is the genius of the English people that they never leave a country without giving it a last kick. They did it in Ireland, and for centuries it had been suffering. They did it in Palestine and you see the confusion they created. They did it in Cyprus. They did it in India. They leave the country divided.’
After Lord Mountbatten had discussions with Jinnah and Nehru, the plan to partition was taken to London.
When the final Mountbatten plan for the partition of India was approved in London in May 1947, Churchill, the leader of the opposition, gave a message to Mountbatten and Jinnah that it was a life and death matter for him to accept the plan. Mountbatten, while conveying this message to Jinnah, also gave permission to Jinnah to inform his working committee of this message, so long as it was not quoted in the newspapers.
Ziegler describes that ‘once the approval was done in England now Mountbatten was determined to drive them forward at a pace which would make it impossible for anyone to have second thoughts or overmuch about the details. At 10 A.M. On June 2nd, Nehru, Patel, and Kriplani for the Hindus, Jinnah, Liaqat Ali Khan, and Abdur Rab Nisar for the Muslims and Sikh Baldev Singh met with the Viceroy to receive copies of the British Government’s statement ‘Immediate transfer of power.’
Thus the plan for the partition of India was decided by Lord Mountbatten, Jinnah, and Nehru.
The ironies abound. The first was that territories were decided only informally. The final decision was yet to come. Formal approval had not yet been obtained from either the Muslim League or the Indian National Congress. No other political parties were consulted.
The announcement of the partition of India was made the next day, and immediately, it started the kind of violence that the subcontinent had never seen before.
Since the partition is pinned on Savarkar, it should be remembered that he was neither consulted nor did he approve of it when he learned about it.
AI generated reference image.
‘Have You Seen the Slaughtering of a Goat?’ Muslims Teens Brutally Kill Hindu Minor on Eid
by Ashlyn Davis
The killing of 17-year-old Hindu teenager Surya Chauhan in Uttar Pradesh’s Ghaziabad district by five Muslim youth has triggered outrage, protests, heightened security deployment, and exposed all the pro-Islamic narrative made by Muslim-pandering institutions.
Muslims around the world celebrated Eid al-Bakr on May 27 and 28. For years, liberal groups and many media outlets in India have presented the Islamic festival as a celebration of joy, brotherhood, and communal harmony. However, people have now started to recognize that nothing about any Islamic tradition can ever be about communal harmony, and are rejecting the fake narratives that apologists of Islam peddle.
While media outlets such as Al Jazeera frame Indian Muslims as “naturally scared,” the gory crime that these five Muslim teenagers committed told a very different story. In the middle of a busy neighborhood and in broad daylight, they executed a brutal murder with shocking audacity. Their actions suggested not fear, but a brazen disregard for the rule of law and a disturbing indifference to human life. An intensive police investigation followed, after allegations emerged that the attackers had made chilling, religiously charged remarks moments before stabbing him to death. This killing has since become one of the most widely discussed criminal cases in the region, with residents demanding swift arrests and strict punishment for those responsible.
The case drew nationwide attention after eyewitness accounts cited by several media organizations claimed that one of the attackers made the remark, “Bakra halal hote dekha hai?” before the stabbing. The statement, which translates to “Have you ever seen a goat being slaughtered?,” was widely circulated on social media and became the focal point of public outrage, because the attack occurred around the time of Eid al-Adha celebrations.
According to the complaint that the victim’s family filed, the attack occurred at around 3:30 pm near Chaudhary School in Navneet Vihar under the Khoda police station area. The family alleged that the prime accused called Surya to the location. The accused had been his friend, and he had allegedly been involved in a minor dispute with him several months earlier. What began as a confrontation quickly escalated into a violent assault. The Hindu teen was attacked with sharp knives and sustained multiple serious stab injuries. Witnesses and family members rushed him to a hospital in Sector 62, Noida, for medical treatment. Despite medical efforts, he succumbed to his injuries during treatment. Visuals of the gruesome act were captured on camera and have since gone viral on all social media platforms.
Many Muslims begin training their children in slaughter from a very young age. While most parents teach their children the alphabet, basic mathematics, colors, rhymes, friendship, and compassion, children in jihadi families are taught how to kill living beings. Their minds are filled with radical ideas, and much of their natural innocence, empathy, and sensitivity is gradually stripped away.
@BillTheKid1603 India was heavily industrialized. The Europeans came for textiles, iron products and salt Peter. It went through a deindustrialization phase due to colonial occupation.
You are utterly wrong in your opinion!
📌 First: why should other historians from other cultures, and even Hindus , look at Hinduism from a secular perspective. Hinduism is a religion, and one should see it as a religion. There is nothing ‘secular’ about a religion. You don’t get to separate our gods from our faith and approach them in a secular manner and sexualise them to fit your fantasies. Yes, that’s many white historians and their brown slaves have done. Sexualise our gods in name of secularism. We know the ‘white’ historians tricks now!
📌 Second- Hindu gods have multiple names from ancient times.
I will give only the example of Shiva-Rudra. The various names enunciates how many of the traits of the god are inherent in the one hundred names of Rudra, as enumerated in the Satarudriya text of the Sukla Yajurreda of the Vajasaneyi school (Vajasaneyi Samhita, Ch. 16).
The association of Rudra with the hills (one of his names in this context is Giritra or 'one who lives in the hills '), his dual nature of a terrific as well as a pacific god, his use of animal-hide as his garment (Krttivasa), the crown of snail-shell like jatas on his head (Kapardi), etc., are emphasised by these epithets or names, which were the roots of many stories elaborately narrated in the Epics and Puranic literature.
The worship of a god similar in some respects to the Puranic Shiva was well in vogue among the early Harappan people. Rudra of the Vedas still continues to be one of the principal names of Shiva, and also seen in the epics and Puranas.
The Svetasvatara Upanishad, uses Shiva several times as one of the
various names of Rudra. The Sankhyayana, Kausitaki, and
and other Brähmanas use such names as Siva, Rudra-Siva, Mahadeva, Maheswara, and Isana, for denoting only one god.
Benefits of living as a Hindu
- Joy Mathew, Kerala movie actor
_No need to go to learn religion from childhood.
_No strict rules on what to do, what not to do, or how to live...
_No need to wear a cap...
No need for circumcision...
No need to get baptized...
_No need to wake up early and go to the temple... Only those with faith need to go.
_When you feel like going, you can go to any temple without checking caste, language, or worship rituals.
_Even if you go or don’t go, the temple priest or committee members won’t glare at you...
_Won’t be branded as someone without fear of God... Won’t be excommunicated... Won’t be condemned to a “rogue’s grave” when dead...
_No need for a good conduct certificate from religious heads to get married...
No need for recommendation letters...
_No one goes to the temple to inquire “what kind of guy he is”... The bride’s family won’t check if he’s a religious believer...
_No one checks if the girl is a religious believer, a “916 Hindu”, or lives by Hindu customs...
_You can live peacefully with one or two children as you wish.
_Since there’s no ban on drinking alcohol, no need to go crazy using ganja or drugs.
_You can watch movies, dance, sing — with no restrictions.
_You can lend money at interest, or borrow it.
_You can vote for anyone, live however you want... no rules...
_No scaring about the afterlife.
_No need to waste a lifetime dreaming of rivers of wine and hooris. No need to fear being made firewood in hell...
_From creation to the structure of the universe — nothing here is against modern science.
_If you have time and study the Vedas, you can answer any atheist’s question.
_No separate laws for women...
No special prohibitions for women...
_If a woman dances, no crowd will gather to abuse her... They’ll clap and encourage her...
_From childhood, send her for dance... send her for music... send her for sports...
_No need to cover the face or head. Can wear clothes of choice...
_No separate dining area for her... No bans in crowds... no rules... no prohibitions...
_You can pray to the God of any religion. Can hang a star, set up a crib, celebrate any festival,
_Even if you don’t get them in return, you can send Christmas, Easter, Eid, Nabi Day wishes to friends. No one will question you;
_And you don’t have to fear anyone to share this!
Pleasant, beautiful, peaceful, free... Life as you like!!
_If asked “Do you have a religion?” — Yes... If asked “Don’t you have a religion?” — No.
Missed one thing...
No need to fight for a spot in the cemetery for the funeral... Just need some firewood.
@marinebharat This is a generalization.
Mostly people without kids live in mega cities. Once the kids are there and more space is needed - logical to shift to village. Since NRI prefer good school districts they tend to cluster in such places.