@wesbos Generative UIs will be inconsistent and bad UX. LLMs canโt think, you need people who take the time to understand what is really important and make decisions about how to help a user accomplish any given task easier.
You cannot/should not outsource thinking
@developedbyed I donโt really get it, to me itโs a completely different tool with a different use case. If youโre doing real thought out unique design work youโd use a tool like Figma. Trying to bring a specific design vision to life via text description just isnโt a good UX
@erikdkennedy I have been trying something similar with a document of my own design principles including what I picked up from LUID, but it doesnโt seem to translate that well for me so far
@jeffrey_way A lot of your posts lately would seem to imply you think coding is solved. If this is your take, I'm not sure why you've said you'll be pivoting Laracasts away from its original style of teaching to be more AI-centric, unless I've misinterpreted. How are you defining vibe coding?
@ZssBecker Are they "vibe coding" or are they using it intentionally, creating detailed specs, explicitly telling the AI how to do it and reviewing what output is? If not, that might be why you're spending so many credits
Regardless. I think you're right. People have lost their minds
@jeffrey_way YOU can build a useful app in a day. Because of your existing experience as a developer. The average person or a new developer that doesnโt have the chance or inclination to learn the hard way wonโt. I think itโs easy to lose perspective
@jeffrey_way Fundementals and code literacy are so important. I watched a non-programmer fumble through using AI today, it was painful.
My usage of AI has only reinforced how important fundentals are so itโs discouraging seeing you say youโll be abandoning that as a lifetime laracasts member