A simple way to test for fraud would be to check the vote returns of the harvested ballots delivered to drop boxes by 3rd party ballot harvesters. If those batches have statistically unrealistic Stalinesque results then it's safe to assume some shenanigans took place. But CA doesn't specifically track the returns of harvested ballots! They are simply lumped in with all other absentee ballots. So we have no way of knowing if the harvested ballots have unrealistic statistical abnormalities in their returns. Worth noting that Nithya Raman's abnormal vote surge occurred roughly when harvested ballots dropped off late on Election Day would have been counted. But of course we have no way to know for sure because California literally designed a voting system that allows unlimited unsupervised ballot harvesting & zero tracking of how those harvested ballots voted compared to mail in & in person votes. 🙄
Here it is:
A hidden-camera 🔥🔥 bombshell:
This is Democrat operative Joel Caldwell of the “Coalition for the People’s Agenda,” a Fulton County ballot-harvesting NGO chief—caught on tape admitting it all.
Democrats are stuffing ballot drop boxes with fraudulent votes, and it’s all caught on videotape. He also admits this is how they rigged the 2020 election and why Democrats fight to the death against voter ID.
• They pay people to illegally ballot-harvest.
• They bribe ballot counters and election officials.
• They forge and falsify ballots.
And the Atlanta mayor straight-up stole the election.
He says it all himself—on tape.
Joel Caldwell:
“That’s what happened in 2020, ’cause that’s when the ballots—they started stuffing them ballots and people stuffing them ballots, and they got videotape of them, but nobody talks about it. That’s why Trump was making that big deal about it, because you see it on videotape. It’s like, come on. We see the man pull up and put a hundred ballots in this box. You know? You can’t do that sh*t.
So groups were paying people to do just that—drop off ballots.”
He continues: That’s why Democrats fight to the death against voter ID laws.
Joel Caldwell:
“That’s why the Republicans are always trying to fight the ballot—you know, that’s the whole argument, because Republicans are the ones who put out that kind of stuff, so they want voter IDs and stuff. Democrats are fighting voter ID laws. It’s a two-sided thing. That’s what they’re fighting over. Republicans are trying to say, ‘Hey, look, we got proof of this sh*t.’
And the Democrats are like, well, we don’t want voter ID laws, and we want to make it where you can just drop your ballot off—online voting and different things they try to come up with.”
📝 This is the type of stuff happening across blue cities, right before an election, including Los Angeles as we speak—good God, they’re bribing the LA homeless with drugs for votes.
Andrew Tate perfectly sums up UK Migration issue:
"Here's 10 chocolate bars. 2 are poison. Do you want to eat one? What kind of retard would go well, only 20% of them k*ll people, so I guess the other 80% are fine!?"
"That doesn't make you f*cking racist, it makes you very sensible."
THE FORMULAS
WHAT THEY MEAN AND WHY THEY MATTER
I derived four deterministic linear formulas from the ballot drop data:
Raman% = 27.87 + (3.19 × drop number)
Pratt% = 22.05 - (1.17 × drop number)
Bass% = 40.20 - (1.86 × drop number)
Other% = 9.88 - (0.16 × drop number)
The Starting Points
The constants - 27.87, 22.05, 40.20, 9.88 - represent each candidate’s baseline. Where they genuinely stood when post-election counting began. Real votes. Organic support. These are the numbers before anything unusual occurs.
The Slopes - How the Formula Runs
The slope is the increment applied to each candidate every single drop. It gets multiplied by drop number - 1, 2, 3, 4 - which means the effect escalates automatically with each drop.
So for Raman it isn’t just plus 3.19% every drop. It’s:
Drop 1: 27.87 + (3.19 × 1) = 31.06%
Drop 2: 27.87 + (3.19 × 2) = 34.25%
Drop 3: 27.87 + (3.19 × 3) = 37.44%
Drop 4: 27.87 + (3.19 × 4) = 40.63%
Drop 5 predicted: 27.87 + (3.19 × 5) = 43.82%
Each drop pushes her further from her baseline. It is built in. Automatic by design.
The slopes also sum to exactly zero.
+3.19 - 1.17 - 1.86 - 0.16 = 0.00
Every percentage point Raman gains comes precisely from the other three candidates/groups combined. This is a closed system. Conservation of votes. The formula doesn’t create votes - it redistributes them.
The R Values - The results were remarkable
To validate these formulas I ran linear regression analysis. The Pearson correlation coefficients, R values, came back as follows:
Raman vs Pratt: R = 0.9966
Raman vs Bass: R = 0.9934
Raman vs Batch: R = 0.9984
Raman vs Other: R = 0.9794
R values measure how perfectly data fits a straight line. They run from 0 to 1.
0 means completely random.
No pattern whatsoever.
1 means a perfect straight line.
Every point exactly where predicted.
For context:
0.70 is considered strong in social science research.
0.85 gets researchers excited.
0.90+ is extraordinarily rare in human behavioral data.
Squaring them to get R² values:
Raman vs Pratt: R² = 0.9932
Raman vs Bass: R² = 0.9869
Raman vs Other: R² = 0.9592
Raman vs Batch: R² = 0.9968
That last number, 0.9968, means that 99.68% of Raman’s vote share movement across these drops is explained by a single variable. Drop number. Nothing else. Just counting to five.
You get R values like that in physics experiments. In controlled laboratory conditions. Measuring the expansion of metal under heat. Not in elections. Not in a major American city with millions of diverse voters casting ballots across weeks.
The Slope Relationship
The slope of 3.110 between Raman and Pratt is particularly significant.
It means for every percentage point Pratt lost Raman gained 3.110 points. Every drop. Without variation. Without noise.
Candidates in a democratic election don’t move in mathematical opposition to each other at a fixed ratio across 200,000 ballots. Four variables in an equation do.
Why The Shutoff Had To Exist
Because drop number keeps increasing, the formula keeps pushing percentages further from baseline. Left unchecked by drop 7 the math produces:
Raman: 27.87 + (3.19 × 7) = 50.2%
Pratt: 22.05 - (1.17 × 7) = 13.9%
Bass: 40.20 - (1.86 × 7) = 27.2%
So the formula was never intended to run to completion. It was designed to run until a specific objective was achieved, Raman leading Pratt by a sufficient margin to secure the runoff and then stop.
The stopping condition appears to have been triggered at approximately 38,000 votes into drop 5. The precise moment Raman crossed 3,000 votes ahead of Pratt.
After that point the remaining 9,800 votes in drop 5 distributed at approximately the baseline that existed after drop four.
The formula completed its task. Then it stopped. And the numbers went back to looking normal.
Despite having hundreds of mosques in New York, mass street “prayers” are becoming a staple of life in the Big Apple.
And it’s not prayers, my friends, but assertion. They are claiming turf, like hyenas pissing to mark territory.
The Netherlands also has its Henry Nowak cases.
In July 2020, 14-year-old Tamar from Marken was hit by a car on a dark dike road and left to die. Her body was later found in the berm.
What happened next is deeply disturbing.
The police initially told her mother that the driver was German. Days later the truth came out: it was four Iraqis in the car. The mother was told they withheld the real background because they didn’t want to create a "Wilders-effect" — they didn’t want to give Geert Wilders political ammunition.
Even worse: evidence strongly suggests Tamar’s body was moved after the accident. The driver didn’t just flee, they dragged her off the road and left her there like an animal.
The driver received only a €1,500 fine for looking at his phone while driving. He then disappeared completely. The fine was returned “undeliverable” and for years he was untraceable.
Only after years of fighting by the family (including going to court to force prosecution), a breakthrough came in March 2026: the now 33-year old Jamal is finally being prosecuted for causing the fatal accident and leaving the scene.
Just like Henry Nowak in Southampton — an innocent young person dies, authorities seem more focused on protecting a narrative and avoiding “political incorrectness” than on delivering swift justice.
A 14-year-old girl dies on a Dutch dike. The system lies about the identity of the driver, gives him a slap on the wrist, loses him for years, and only after massive pressure does real prosecution begin.
This is not just a traffic accident. This is a story about truth, accountability, and what happens when institutions put ideology before grieving families.
Her name was Tamar.
She was 14.
She deserved better.
♡
@liz_churchill10@Ne_pas_couvrir I can’t believe the bystanders. I would have ripped the attackers head off. Pounded his skull into the pavement. If I saw him trying to behead a neighbor
@jukan05@BenBajarin Having worked closely with Intel, and Taiwan companies, I can tell you Intel is too lazy and bureaucratic to seriously compete with TSMC. Smart people. But they are extremely slow and political. Their fabs are prehistoric. Their yields don’t compete.
“BLACKS ARE OVER POLICED AND UNFAIRLY IMPRISONED”
Give me a fucking break.
12-year-old White girl Autumn Pasquale was riding her new BMX bike in Clayton, NJ when Black brothers Justin & Dante Robinson lured her into their basement with bike parts.
Justin strangled her to death. Dante helped lure her and dispose of her body, stuffing her in a recycling bin behind their house.
Media buried the story.
Justin got just 17 years
He is to be released next April of 2027.
Her family never gets her back. She’s gone forever.
He will soon walk free to live his life.
Another innocent White child gone.
Another story they don’t want you to see.
When will we say their names? When will the punishment fit the crime?
Look at Dante’s black power fist ✊🏿
A White girl was his target. His brother helped.
I always thought that Trump’s accusations about stealing the elections in 2020 were bullshit. I believed that the results back then were legit.
Now when I’m seeing the extremely odd mail ballot results in the California races, I’m not so sure anymore