This current establishment strategy of “don’t talk about the horrors of immigration or you’ll make matters worse” is the classic attitude of a domestic violence victim.
A parent who wants a child-lock on their kid’s phone can switch one on today. For free. They just have to turn it on.
This is not about parenting. Starmer and Shamood are lying. And the evidence is plain to see. 👇👇👇
Lots of people would like to turn the clock back.
To a time when the police didn’t just take the word of a murderer who cried “racist!”
When beheadings didn’t happen on British streets.
When our leaders took pride in our country and its history.
Labour belong in the bin.
A lot of men up in arms over the attack in North Belfast who have absolutely nothing to say femicide levels in NI, the most deadly place to be a women in the UK and Ireland.
Whipping up rage and anger because an immigrant is involved tells you everything about their motives.
📣🚨 FSU Victory!!
The Free Speech Union has just heard from South Wales Police that it has withdrawn its guidance on “anti-Muslim hostility”.
The force had effectively adopted its own Islamic blasphemy law, instructing officers to record any conversation that went beyond “legitimate” discussion of Islam.
Under this guidance, criticism of Islam could have been recorded as an anti-social behaviour incident and potentially appeared on DBS checks, affecting someone’s ability to work as a teacher, carer, or in other regulated professions.
South Wales Police has backed down because the Free Speech Union threatened them with a judicial review if it chose to press ahead with the policy.
The force has described this move as a “pause” to the guidance — but we think it is highly unlikely to return.
We must also thank Shadow Equalities Minister @ClaireCoutinho for referring South Wales Police to the Equality and Human Rights Commission after we brought this issue to her attention.
Blasphemy laws were abolished by Parliament 18 years ago. We must not allow them to return through the back door.
Let this be a warning to any other public body — particularly police forces — considering the adoption of its own blasphemy laws.
Watch Lord Young below 👇
Step 1: The Left enacts a policy.
Step 2: The policy has horrific consequences.
Step 3: People notice the horror and react negatively.
Step 4: The Left charges those people with “weaponising” the horrific consequences for political gain.
This is what the UK spyware proposal means.
There must be government spyware on every mobile device. It shall watch everything that happens, including always watching the screen, looking for things the government disapproves of.
When anything is flagged by the software as something the government doesn't like, the software must block it from being sent or displayed (in realtime).
The user of the device must not be able to shut this watching and blocking off. The only way to shut it off would be to ask the government or its proxies to do so for you, at their discretion.
Therefore the whole device must be locked down. Administrator rights and the decision of what software or operating system to run or not to run must be taken from the owner/user and handed to the government and its proxies.
Apple and Google are themselves working hard to lock down the devices they are involved in to shut out competition and establish a duopoly.
The UK government says it is "working closely" with Apple and Google and currently they synchronise and coordinate their communication on this subject.
The UK government is now proposing to mandate what would otherwise be illegal anti-competitive practices.
@GrapheneOS on the Apple and Google duopoly:
https://t.co/rbRmcUDTRu
Statement from @signalapp
https://t.co/vJILcSrs4s
@ReclaimTheNetHQ on the state spyware:
https://t.co/3FCi06bP77
The government announcement:
https://t.co/ynYjR3DIRo
Keir Starmer is set to impose internet restrictions on millions of Britons within days.
What will that mean for our ability to log into X?
Elon Musk bought X to save freedom of speech.
Starmer is trying to control us.
This is not about protecting children. This is about silencing dissent, monitoring every word, and turning the internet into a state-approved echo chamber.
The same regime that jails people for tweets now wants to gatekeep the entire web.
They fear the truth spreading.
They fear you speaking freely.
They fear X.
We will not comply.
We will not be silenced.
Starmer’s digital prison will fail.
The British people will find a way to speak — no matter what restrictions he imposes.
Freedom will not be surrendered without a fight.
Keir Starmer, wants us all to digitally verify ourselves to post anything on social media. So the government can check what we say and who we say it to.
Also Keir Starmer, uses disposable message on whatsapp so he can avoid scrutiny.
Spot anything?
We're being pressured to accept digital surveillance by default, under the banner of child safety. The proposals stink, and should be fought tooth and nail - because we've already seen the inevitable resulting mission creep in the "Online Safety Act":
Andy Burnham could have stood in Makerfield in 2024 but chose not to.
He apparently tried to stand in 26 different seats including Gorton & Denton, Bootle and Warrington.
We are bottom of Burnham’s list.
Imagínate lo horrible que tienes que ser como ser humano para votar en contra de que se investigue la violación masiva de niñas.
Ese es el Partido Laborista 🇬🇧
Please remember that you must not express your feelings about the Belfast atrocity until the political establishment has told you exactly how you are supposed to feel. That's how it works now.
'The Government is setting up one of the most authoritarian internet regimes in the world.'
Director of Big Brother Watch, Silkie Carlo, says Keir Starmer's plan to limit children from seeing, taking, and sharing nude images online, is 'effectively ID cards for the internet'.
The latest statistics show 62% of biological males who identify as transgender have been convicted of sexual offences.
That is compared to 17% for the overall male prison population.
Our statement on the UK government’s demand that all content on all devices sold or used in the country be scanned, on the presumption of nudity, using a dystopian combination of age verification and content scanning. This proposal will not safeguard children. It endangers us all.
https://t.co/VdWe9uhi8p