The London Machine Learning Meetup is the largest machine learning community in Europe. Previous speakers include Juergen Schmidhuber, David Silver, Yoshua Bengio and Andrej Karpathy.
Join our next meetup: https://t.co/CDjfKkDnqB
Or watch videos:
https://t.co/u0PXO4TYIH
@jamieamartin1 The studies you cite are about the negative effects of childcare for children of age 0-2. Free childcare in the uk is for children of 3 and 4. Please cite appropriate evidence for your claim.
@Support We need to regain access to our companies account @EvolutionAI. We have tried everything but the email codes never reach our email inbox. Please help.
Did the White House use ChatGPT Vibe Code a retarded formula for our tariffs and then were too dumb to cover it up?
Yes. Here's the wildest trade story you missed today 🧵👇
All you need to know to understand which company will win a technology competition is look at the first and second derivatives of the rate of innovation
@Scobleizer Unfortunately the accuracy is about 80%. I wouldn't be surprised if a single feature (eg feeding problems) was responsible for all of the predictive power of this "AI" system.
Our CEO, Dr @martingoodson, will participate in @ArmstrongWolfe & @LSEGplc's COO Debating Society event next week.
The motion of the debate is 'AI presents a greater opportunity than threat to Financial Services'. If you have any insights, please leave them below.
No moat memo continues to age well.
Open source will inevitably take over AI. There is no AI without open source anyway. You have no OpenAI without Linux, containers, Pytorch, Transformers, etc.
Only thing that can kill it is regulatory assassination.
https://t.co/VxBV0wXkVU
Task contamination is worse than we imagined?
Models perform better on datasets that were released before the models
+ Models can generate examples from tasks (NYT vibes)
Changmao Li @jmflanig
https://t.co/hRyKOxaGHo
No moat memo continues to age well.
Open source will inevitably take over AI. There is no AI without open source anyway. You have no OpenAI without Linux, containers, Pytorch, Transformers, etc.
Only thing that can kill it is regulatory assassination.
https://t.co/VxBV0wXkVU
Sharing my recent slides on how to train and deploy open-source LLMs
Goes over
* SFT, DPO with tools like @huggingface TRL/PEFT
* renting GPUs on @runpod and others
* setting up serverless vs dedicated APIs with TGI/vLLM/@togethercompute etc.
https://t.co/F5Hm38wj3j
Ok, by popular demand: a starter set of papers you can read on the topic.
"Comparing Humans, GPT-4, and GPT-4V On Abstraction and Reasoning Tasks": https://t.co/nhDrr94sgK
"Embers of Autoregression: Understanding Large Language Models Through the Problem They are Trained to Solve": https://t.co/vj1AZoZUBi
"Faith and Fate: Limits of Transformers on Compositionality": https://t.co/TQ2yyBFxUW
"The Reversal Curse: LLMs trained on "A is B" fail to learn 'B is A'": https://t.co/m2hXF5HDri
"On the measure of intelligence": https://t.co/RjYH7Z3pmJ not about LLMs, but provides context and grounding on what it means to be intelligent and the nature of generalization. It also introduces an intelligence benchmark (ARC) that remains completely out of reach for LLMs. Ironically the best-performing LLM-based systems on ARC are those that have been trained on tons of generated tasks, hoping to hit some overlap between test set tasks and your generated tasks -- LLMs have zero ability to tackle an actually new task.
In general there's a new paper documenting the lack of broad generalization capabilities of LLMs every few days.
@erikbryn The technique in this paper is more suited to algorithm discovery rather than scientific discovery. It relies on having a method for verifying a proposed solution. The LLM doesn't know the answer, but it can generate good proposals. 1/
I've discovered a Brexit opportunity.
The firm founded by Jacob Rees-Mogg is winding down, after St James's Place severed ties - amid regulatory pressure to comply with new FCA consumer duty rules. Amazingly, the FCA couldn't have imposed these rules before Brexit.
This is doing numbers at the moment but the data does not show that TikTok *drives* antisemitism. This is a clear case of selection bias: people who use TikTok are from a different demographic to those who don't.
This is very disappointing. @antgoldbloom should know better.
A new survey suggests TikTok is a meaningful driver of a surge in antisemitism. #TikToxic
Spending at least 30 minutes a day on TikTok increases the chances a respondent holds antisemitic or anti-Israel views by 17% (compared with 6% for Instagram and 2% for X).