MattJT

investing /
crypto /
politics /
switzerland /
love a good meme

[BuccoCapital Bloke @buccocapital]

“Sir, another 22 year old has found a job”

[MattJT @MattJT2]

@unseen1_unseen We don't have a president

[MattJT @MattJT2]

@yieldsearcher Maybe just a switch in IBIT

[MattJT @MattJT2]

@HayekAndKeynes Why work more if most of it goes to paying taxes?

[Tim Kellner @TimKoffiziell]

Geht es noch demütigender?

Der US-Vizepräsident JD Vance verlässt die AI Show in Paris noch vor Macrons und Uschi von der Leyens Rede.

Großartig!
Weiter so!

#Vance

[Charlie Bilello @charliebilello]

US stocks have outperformed International stocks for over 16 years, by far the longest run of outperformance in history.

So far this year, we're seeing the opposite, with International stocks up 5.8% vs. a 2.9% gain for the S&P 500.

Video: https://t.co/MkL2I8ZkFh

[Julien Bittel, CFA @BittelJulien]

On days like today, zoom out.

[Nayib Bukele @nayibbukele]

Most governments don’t want USAID funds flowing into their countries because they understand where much of that money actually ends up.

While marketed as support for development, democracy, and human rights, the majority of these funds are funneled into opposition groups, NGOs with political agendas, and destabilizing movements.

At best, maybe 10% of the money reaches real projects that help people in need (there are such cases), but the rest is used to fuel dissent, finance protests, and undermine administrations that refuse to align with the globalist agenda.

Cutting this so-called aid isn’t just beneficial for the United States; it’s also a big win for the rest of the world.

[CTO Larsson @ctoLarsson]

When I was a kid we no one locked the doors.

You just walked into the house of your friends.

The occasional crime in my town:
Local alcoholic snatched a beer and a pack of cigg from the store.
Tried to smoke it before the police arrived and told him not to do it again 🥲

Today:

[AntonKreil @AntonKreil]

I hate to say "I told you so" but ...

From Aprill 11th 2018.

Full presentation CLICK HERE;-
https://t.co/uR8AhC7lx0

#AntonKreil

[MattJT @MattJT2]

@investanswers

[MattJT @MattJT2]

@TgMacro Hahaha priceless

[James Wang @draecomino]

He literally put party before country

[MattJT @MattJT2]

@charliebilello Can you also update the 60/40 chart please?

[MattJT @MattJT2]

@JackFarley96 @Citrini7 How to play NVDA here

[MattJT @MattJT2]

@HiddenValueGems KER

[MattJT @MattJT2]

@AndreasSteno @adamtaggart The guys from New Harbor make it even worse

[MattJT @MattJT2]

@marcfriedrich

[🇺🇸 Freedom Piper 🇺🇸 @FreeThinkerInc]

🚨🚨🚨 BREAKING: In a landmark 9-0 ruling on Wednesday that you will never hear about in the media, the US Supreme Court has undercut all DEI-based discrimination, sending the Marxists into a tizzy.

The US Supreme Court's ruling that a St. Louis police sergeant can sue over a job transfer she claims was discriminatory lays the foundation for legal action against employers who push discrimination against white people in job hiring, work assignment and promotion. That’s right, those “diversity-preferred” job postings, the practice of passing over whites for promotions, discriminatory job transfers, pushing unfair diversity trainings, etc…all of these are now legally actionable.

The ruling was championed by human rights groups as "an enormous win for workers,” but has lawyers for companies like Disney warning that it could have a chilling effect on employers' diversity initiatives.

Disney’s "Pale and Male is Stale" policy is a prime example. Disney has allegedly used it to drive out white animators by giving them the worst assignments, even though they them have the most experience, skill, and seniority, in order to make the job humiliating enough that they quit…which many of them have done.

The same companies argue that there is ‘good discrimination’ and “bad discrimination’, that white people should be purposely disadvantaged to pave the way for diversity. The lawyers stated that the decision will ‘complicate’ DEI programs and limit their ability to discriminate against white men.

The Supreme Court torpedoed these claims, re-asserting that everyone is equal in the eyes of the law. Further, the court has established a relatively ‘low standard’ for bringing discrimination cases. The victim need not suffer ‘actual harm’. An employee only must show "some harm" under the terms of their employment, AND that harm need not be "material," "substantial" or "serious." The decision makes it much easier for workers to sue over discriminatory practices.

This is a big win for equality!