Matthew Nguyen

[Nature Portfolio @NaturePortfolio]

A Review in @natrevbioeng discusses two contrasting nanoparticle delivery mechanisms, the enhanced permeability and retention effect and the active transport and retention principle, and their implications for the design of cancer nanomedicines. 🔒 https://t.co/GMe3cjuvWS

[Nature Reviews Bioengineering @natrevbioeng]

This month it’s all about nanoparticle delivery mechanisms! Do not miss the Review by @TheChanLab on the mechanisms of nanoparticle delivery to solid tumours. Now free to access: https://t.co/MnhZcUj0z9

[Nature Reviews Bioengineering @natrevbioeng]

Our March issue is live! Read about mechanisms of nanoparticle delivery, biodistribution of nanomedicines, metabolic engineering, nanomedicine for respiratory infections, fluid protein condensates and more: https://t.co/EUf3GL32vu

[Nature Materials @NatureMaterials]

Our October issue https://t.co/LrZgpwPQUP

[Nature Portfolio @NaturePortfolio]

A Review in @natrevbioeng discusses two contrasting nanoparticle delivery mechanisms, the enhanced permeability and retention effect and the active transport and retention principle, and their implications for the design of cancer nanomedicines. 🔒 https://t.co/GMe3cjuvWS

[The Chan Lab @TheChanLab]

🚨🚨New Paper🚨🚨

Ever wonder where EPR came from?👀

Matt et al. describe the history and evidence for the EPR effect and its impact on cancer nanomedicine. They also discuss a new theory termed the Active Transport and Retention (ATR) principle.🌶️🌶️🌶️

https://t.co/i0Ku9bvYVc

[Nature Materials @NatureMaterials]

The exit of nanoparticles from solid tumours @TheChanLab https://t.co/78oshRTTdj

[Nature Reviews Bioengineering @natrevbioeng]

A nanoparticle delivery paradigm in cancer – the EPR effect - has been challenged, shifting the focus to active delivery mechanisms. In their Review, Warren Chan et al explore passive vs active delivery and the impact on nanoparticle design @TheChanLab
https://t.co/MnhZcUj0z9