The way they treat the individual cases is really ghoulish. It reads pornographically.
The report spends little time acknowledging the malfeasance of the authorities, because they spend less ink detailing the precise contours of how that happened than anywhere near the precision they detail exactly what the criminals did to those poor girls.
The conclusion is obvious. This report document is designed to whip up extreme masculine rage and xenophobic hatred through the mental image of little girls' torn and broken bodies.
This pornographic use of the victims' suffering is profoundly disrespectful. It reduces their harm to a political cause completely disconnected from what makes this type of harm so horrible. It is not the origin of the perpetrator, but the intimacy of the crime itself, and the callous disregard of the authorities.
You will always remember. The mask slips from time to time. They want those girls abused. It’s why they brought the migrants to Europe. Never forget that.
Prior to the internet, flyover-Americans never heard what people like i/o say and think about them unless they somehow entered America's managerial-ruler class.
Nothing radicalized me more than spending 8+ years around these "people" and hearing what they think about my home and its residents, all while they purport to be champions of "tolerance" and the oppressed.
The media’s obsession with the reflecting pool shows that they have the capacity to cover the rampant crime and filth of our inner cities, but choose not to for political reasons
Oh and by the way? That isn’t paint. They would know this if they weren’t total retards.
I wasn’t laughing at Rape Gang Survivors. I founded an organisation dedicated to supporting rape gang survivors.
I was laughing at Charlie Downes, Harrison Pitt, and Alistair Harrison because they are contemptible people. I hold them in contempt for harming survivors.
If you see anyone intentionally downplaying, dismissing, or demeaning the mass rape of little White girls you must immediately view them as just as guilty as the perpetrators.
"But was it EXACTLY 250,000 girls?!?!?"
They do this for precisely one reason.
Suddenly every shitlib is an expert at sceptically evaluating victim numbers in large scale atrocities. And I don't even mean the big H, nothing as spicy as that. The same people who will uncritically repeat complete nonsense about how for example the Belgians killed more people in the Congo than lived in the entire area at the time for basically no reason will tell you that it's a bit much that gangs present pretty much everywhere in Britain with a significant enough demographic of Pakistanis could possibly have targeted and abused 250k girls over the course of 30-40 years. They of course don't actually care about the numbers or about accuracy. They just want everyone to shut up for the sake of Diversity™
The obvious answer they give for this retconning of the guys he smeared as Literally Hitlers in the past is “that was just campaign rhetoric, everyone should have known we didn’t mean it”, and then they don’t understand why the electorate blew it all up and elected Trump who, agree or not, absolutely does mean everything he says about his opponents
I've had to stop for a minute and realise that I've spent the past hour arguing with people on the *amount* of victims of the Rape Gangs. People are annoyed that the 250,000 estimate as stated in the Inquiry Report is too high and that it's probably much lower.
How much lower? 200,000? 100,000? 50,000? I mean, how many victims is enough for it to be a scandal? Do we have a figure on this?
How should we word this? "An unspecified amount of children have been raped," "Probably a lot. At least way more than a thousand. Not sure tbh."
The figure is an estimate because that's ALL WE HAVE. The police didn't do the work. There are no clear logs. We will never know the full scale of this.
I personally cannot wait for some cunt to go through the estimated figures and come back with "Actually, only around 50,000 to 100,000 children were raped. Far lower than Rupert Lowe would have us all believe!"
The estimated figure exists precisely because we will never know the true number. And that should be a conversation all by itself.
Maybe that was the intention.