"At the risk of seeming ridiculous, let me say that the true revolutionary is guided by a great feeling of love."
The time to organise is now !!
It's now or never!
🫡
#HatinaKubvunzwa
We attended the public hearings—they ignored and assaulted us.
The Constitution says the Bill should have been submitted to the people in a Referendum—they ignored that.
So today I am staying home to say “Hatina Kubvunzwa!”
#31July#Asibuzwanga
#WeWereNOTconsulted
The youth across the country have joined the #Freeplay campaign.
We demand fair play
We demand that our *Constitution be defended and restored.We will continue to ensure there is #freeplay in the application of the Constitution.
Zimbabwe belongs to all of us.
#NotoCAB3
Parliament, President, Minister none of you get to erase term limits behind closed doors. You want them gone? Ask every single citizen in a referendum. Until then, Hands off. #ReferendumNow#StopTheCoup#Noto2030#notoconstitutionalcoup
S95(2)(b) is a term limit provision that is entrenched in s328(7) & can't be amended without going to a referendum as the ConCourt has already established in the Mupungu judgment &for ED to benefit we need another referendum making then 2 & must happen at least 6 months apart.
This court application seeks to compel government to hold a referendum as enshrined in s328(7) when amending entrenched provisions which are mentioned in CAB3.
#Referendum#Noto2030
CAB3 violates our political rights enshrined in 67 as it takes away our right to vote for a president, and Chapter 4 of our constitution is entrenched in s328, which is why we need a referendum.
#Referendum#Noto2030
We fully Associate with the below application, especially noting that the doctrine of ripeness is an exception as previously argued by the misinformed varakashi. Take the CAB3 to a referendum and let our people decide. @africaIYP@MateteYoung@mutamba_tsitsi@Simbarasherambs
Do you know that the ConCourt in the Mupungu judgment has already stated that s95(2) of the Constitution is a term limit provision already entrenched in the constitution under s328(7)?
#Referendum#NoTo2030
Do you know that the ConCourt in the Mupungu judgment has already stated that s95(2) of the Constitution is a term limit provision already entrenched in the constitution under s328(7)?
#referendum#Noto2030
CAB3 nullifies our presidential voting right under Article 67, defying Chapter 4’s s328 entrenchment. No referendum = no consent. Resist this coup by statute. #Referendum#Noto2030
The govt through the min of justice have already said govt will not hold a referendum & @ZANUPF_Official through its politiburo members like Paul Mangwana, Patrick Chinamasa have said the same. We take their word for it, this the reason why we asked the HC to declare a referendum
Do you that the ConCourt in the Mupungu judgment has already stated that s95(2) of the Constitution is a term limit provision already entrenched in the constitution under s328(7)?
#Referendum#NoTo2030
S95(2)(b) is a term limit provision that is entrenched in s328(7) & can't be amended without going to a referendum as the ConCourt has already established in the Mupungu judgment &for ED to benefit we need another referendum making then 2 & must happen at least 6 months apart.
#referendum
#NoTo2030
#NoToConstitutionalCoup
This application asks the High Court to declare that parliament, President & min of justice can't enact clauses 4,9 & 10 without a referendum as it seeks to repeal clauses that are entrenched. The doctrine of ripeness doesn't apply. Do not otherwise be misled.
#Referendum
#NoTo2030
This court application seeks to compel government to hold a referendum as enshrined in s328(7) when amending entrenched provisions which are mentioned in CAB3.
#Referendum#Noto2030
This application asks the High Court to declare that parliament, President &min of justice can't enact clauses 4,9 &10 without a referendum as it seeks to repeal clauses that are entrenched The doctrine of ripeness doesn't apply. Do not otherwise be misled.
#Referendum#Noto2030