I wanted to run multiple agents...
(1) isolated from each other
(2) without full system access and without manually approving all the time
(3) ... while retaining the ability to edit/run the code myself without (on the host system)
Seems unambitious, and yet...
@apoorveth Could be a good alternative to devcontainers. Seems surprisingly "reinvent the wheel" with a bunch of new config formats and whatnot though.
In a way, both things are true & they both mirror across genders.
The average person easily falls for mindworms & bromides. (Worth emphasizing the avg person doesn't exist, it's a statiscal artifact, no one's average on all dimensions.)
Then you are exposed to what's popular online = appealing to averages, which shapes a negative worldview of <outgroup>.
But in real life, it's much more nuanced / less bad. But if you approach <outgroup> with your prior negative view, well-tuned people will avoid you, so you're left with negative reinforcement (hang out with the tribe reinforcing the midcurve takes you agree with, or people who will reinforce the negative midcurve takes you disagree with).
And this just plays out in dating (& political radicalization).
I do think it has very little to do with gender though, it's not *perfectly* symmetrical (because the genders are different), but it still mirrors. You see the exact same dynamic with "all men are jerks" chicks - with that attitude, you never attract a guy that's emotionally in-tune.
@thepaulbalaji@cryptofelon Singapore? London? Brother stop this haram talk.
@cryptofelon is right, overhyped but still absolutely in the top.
Singapore is overpriced depressed Malaysia.
@trent_vanepps@fede_intern@dankrad@laurashin It seems like you & Dankrad have some pretty fundamental disagreement with the current EF direction (and to be fair, so do I — but yes it's complicated) that hasn't been clearly articulated, and that's why I'm really curious about (and I bet other people are too).
Got a very obvious spam sent from "[email protected]", and I was kind of puzzled as to how that's possible.
The attacker basically offers to delegate a throwaway email to you, which is something you can do via some legit Google page. But then, as their "name" they pass a looong body of text (finished by a lot of whitespace) which tells you that they requested that *your* email be delegated *to them* (the legit title of the original email kind of works with this as well) and if you don't do anything, they'll get access within 7 days.
The name shows first because the template is ~~"<name> has offered to delegate their email to you"
All links in the email are to https://t.co/ZwI40kXNZI in the body... but with a redirect attached, of course.
Who would have thought letting people input names thousands of characters long could be abused? Geniuses.