The past two months have been brutal for the market. We’ve held up through it so far, and we’ll continue doing everything we can to stay resilient for the community going forward.
Starting from the December batch, the airdrop will be limited to wallets participating in Stakehouse with a very small amount of TAKE, as a measure against multi-account Sybil behavior.
Given that a significant amount of tokens has already been distributed over the past four months, we believe this is a clearer and more straightforward standard than introducing additional KYC or Sybil checks at this stage.
If you’re already participating in Stakehouse (or Staking V1), nothing changes for you.
We’re exploring additional flexibility around future unlock mechanics for highly engaged participants.
Let’s get through this tough market together.
@alextang In this kind of uncertain environment, what should application builders like us do?
1. Keep applying and experimenting stablecoins across the product
2. Build stablecoin ready system, and wait for standards to emerge
3. Do nothing
Hot take: the stablecoin duopoly doesn’t survive the next 5 years.
Regulation won’t kill stablecoins, but it will localize them.
After working closely with issuers, regulators, and users over the past few years, it’s clear the next phase is licensed, fragmented, and jurisdiction-led.
Asia is where this future is already taking shape.
Full thesis below. Open to discussion.
@AamadMerha15172@bijoy_ce0 The review is all done. I also left a comment on your post. I’ll take another look to see if there’s anything more we can do.
TL;DR:
We need a fairer way to reduce remaining Sybils and better reward real long-term supporters. Let’s discuss openly and figure it out together.
Full context below:
This week has been packed with travel and flights, so I saw this tweet much later than I should have. Thank you for your patience.
I hear you, and truly, our goal is the same:
the long-term growth and fairness of the entire ecosystem.
From the very beginning of the airdrop, we tried to remove as many Sybil attackers as possible. But many still slipped through, and we watched thousands of accounts combine allocations and dump large amounts of tokens. We couldn’t simply ignore something that directly threatened the people who genuinely support this project.
At the same time, logic-based Sybil filtering is never perfect, and yes, some innocent users were impacted. We take that seriously. Our whole team sat together and manually reviewed tens of thousands of accounts, but achieving perfect fairness in a process like this is extremely difficult.
And now, with the remaining airdrops coming, we know there will still be Sybil-type accounts mixed in. So the real question becomes: how do we protect and reward long-term contributors more, while reducing Sybil influence in a way that feels fair to everyone?
Before talking about solutions, I want to highlight something important. Over the past few months, the community has shown what real support looks like.
Each month about 2~3 million TAKE is claimed, and a significant portion keeps getting staked despite the overall market conditions.
This month in particular, around 40% of all claimed tokens were staked. That level of commitment is a major reason the price held so strongly even in one of the toughest market conditions. The impact was visible immediately.
From August to November, the price moved from 0.06 to 0.17 to 0.29 and then stabilized around 0.30 during an extremely harsh month for the entire crypto market.
That stability didn’t come from your contribution. The token’s resilience is a reflection of the community’s behavior, and this month’s strong staking participation played a significant role in supporting the market.
Moving forward, we have several very important announcements and developments prepared that we believe will push the ecosystem into its next stage of growth. And I genuinely want the people who care about this project to grow with us and benefit with us.
Receiving the airdrop is your right. Selling is also your right. But we need to be honest about one thing. Among the wallets claiming each month, there are still multi-account farmers, bots, and extractive users intentionally dumping large amount of tokens at market price who slow down the project’s growth and take value away from real supporters.
This isn’t about restricting anyone. It’s about making sure the value created by this ecosystem flows toward the people who actually contribute, support, and stay, rather than toward those who only extract from it.
So I want us to discuss this openly. How do we further reduce the influence of these remaining Sybil-type accounts while strengthening rewards for genuine contributors?
If we solve this correctly, the next phase of growth will be bigger, stronger, and shared by the people who truly care about OVERTAKE.
Gm $TAKE -rs,
@overtake_world removed me from the sybil list. But the community is still waiting for clarity and fairness, and I’m not happy about that.
The team has always known that their own regional MOD was wrongly tagged as sybil just like many others. So the real question is: why fix my case now, and what about everyone else who has been waiting for months? I don’t want to assume anything, so I genuinely want the team to answer.
I think my last post may have been misunderstood. I’m not asking for special treatment. I’ll only be satisfied when the whole community gets treated fairly. That’s it. The purpose of my post to proove that their will be many cases like me out there. If i don't deserve sybil tag they also don't.
Whenever Overtake needed support, community showed up. They grinded, pushed, engaged everywhere. They helped keep the project grow.
The community performed their job well.
But our questions were treated like “complaints” instead of loyalty. And that’s not right.
I’m not here to FUD or attack anyone. I’m doing the same job I was supposed to do stand with the community that stood with Overtake.
All we’re asking is simple:
You asked for KYC the community submitted it.
Now check it.
Check their roles, activity, contributions.
Check who actually pushed Overtake across X, Discord, and on-chain for 1.5+ years.
Overtake exists because both the team and the community worked side by side. One without the other doesn’t survive in Web3, and history has proven that again and again.
Nobody wants drama. We just want fairness.
This project belongs to all of us. Don’t lose the people who helped build it.
@impalementd@Nexpace_HQ@overtake_world I always enjoy reading your posts 1mpal. Thanks for the highlight.
Overtake team has been putting a lot of thought into the staking model. We’ll be rolling out an updated staking system with several new features later this month, so please stay tuned!
Hi Lizzie thank you always for your support.
Somnis will be soon re-published on the Web2 side by another publisher. The detailed plans aren’t finalized yet, and there isn’t much I can publicly share at this moment, so it’s a bit difficult to go into specifics.
The game will be upgraded and released in a more polished and fun version (probably within 1–2 months).
But in terms of doing something directly tied to Overtake, that may be difficult this time. If anything changes, I’ll make sure to keep you updated.
@evandromoisinho Thanks for the idea! We used GALXE before for some of our past campaigns, but it seems like they’ve added a lot more features since then. I’ll check it out with @0xneoguri
@0xKae_ Yes we are thinking about what to do with the unclaimed allocation. Some of it will likely be used as additional rewards for users, and some may be used for exchange (listing) related purposes. We'll be sharing plans during this month