Dmitrii Osenilo

The physics can be understandable. All relativistic and quantum postulates are easy to explain through mechanics. Etherdynamics is the science of the future.

[Dmitrii Osenilo @OseniloPhys]

What if light is not just a field - but a ripple in a hidden mechanical medium?

A bold look at a modern aether-dynamics model: where it shines, where it struggles, and what experiment could kill it.
https://t.co/Yq2nsj4nb5

[Dmitrii Osenilo @OseniloPhys]

@crystallize89 @markusdd5 I completely agree with him. But most modern physicists don't give a shit about that.

[Dmitrii Osenilo @OseniloPhys]

@crystallize89 @BrianDunning I have been saying for a long time that modern physics has begun to adopt laws administratively. And any doubts can be detrimental to a scientific career.

[Dmitrii Osenilo @OseniloPhys]

@dmiwer @crystallize89 @asper Вы правы, они неполны и даже неверны, если следовать логике. Но спорить с ними нельзя. Не видите в этом шизу?

[Dmitrii Osenilo @OseniloPhys]

@dmiwer @crystallize89 @asper Теперь попробуйте опубликовать работу, которая будет опровергать одну из безусловно неверных по вашим словам теорий.

[Dmitrii Osenilo @OseniloPhys]

@dmiwer @crystallize89 @asper А по факту КМ и ТО считают абсолютной истиной.

[Dmitrii Osenilo @OseniloPhys]

@dmiwer @crystallize89 @asper Про любого.
Хотя Ньютон не говорил, что, например, закон всемирного тяготения - истина в последней инстанции. Это сделали последователи.

[Dmitrii Osenilo @OseniloPhys]

@crystallize89 @dmiwer @asper Есть сам объект, а есть его описание. Это описание никогда не полно, но для большинства задач хватает и его. Так вот, математики от физики в какой-то момент решили, что их неполное математическое описание является полным и эквивалентным объекту. И пошло-поехало с тех пор.

[Dmitrii Osenilo @OseniloPhys]

@crystallize89 @muellerberndt @TOEwithCurt I agree with Nizovtsev on this issue. This is the ratio of the large to small radius of the toroidal vortex-electron.

[Dmitrii Osenilo @OseniloPhys]

Quartz in orbit. A problem for relativity?

Why are atomic clocks the textbook proof of Einstein - but quartz-based TIMATION satellites are barely discussed?

https://t.co/FX7HWwfnNJ

[Dmitrii Osenilo @OseniloPhys]

@MechanimalChief Tottaly agree

[Dmitrii Osenilo @OseniloPhys]

We don't know what 95% of the universe is made of. The other 5%? Described by 19 free parameters we pull out of thin air. 🌌

"A Catalog of Formulas Instead of a Theory" — a new essay on the eclectic crisis in physics. 👇
https://t.co/zc3k376o0Y

[Dmitrii Osenilo @OseniloPhys]

The neutron’s "charge radius" is imaginary. Literally. √(–0.12 fm²) = 0.34i fm.
Physics or fiction? New article breaks down the math trick behind the meme. 👇
https://t.co/9u9qVtl8dr

[Dmitrii Osenilo @OseniloPhys]

@NathanA52851774 3 main papers:
https://t.co/ViFxr2ELvZ - Maxwell
https://t.co/vbjyqywyW2 - photon polarization
https://t.co/aymUfUXCNM - proton neutron structure

I'm currently finishing other articles, the old versions of which are also available on Zenodo.

[Dmitrii Osenilo @OseniloPhys]

They say it's the end of physics. I say it's the beginning. My new, first real Theory of Everything doesn't close the book, it opens a new one, revealing paths to undiscovered physics. The summary is here: https://t.co/KEw3nMDUDx

#TheoryOfEverything #Physics #NewPhysics #Science

[Dmitrii Osenilo @OseniloPhys]

🚀 Can nuclear forces be explained by vortex rings, fluid pressure, and turbulence? No particle exchange. No color charge. Just hydrodynamics.

🌊 From smoke rings to the hard core - this deep dive explores a beautiful (and brutally hard) unified theory.

https://t.co/ycneljc2Ga

[Dmitrii Osenilo @OseniloPhys]

@demystifysci How are you doing with the book release?

[Dmitrii Osenilo @OseniloPhys]

@boriskaragiann @grok Let's look at one phenomenon and try to find an explanation for it in your theory. Do you explain, for example, the polarization of light and the Jones formalism that is used to calculate it?

[Dmitrii Osenilo @OseniloPhys]

🚨 Is fundamental science stuck? We argue for a return to mechanical models and aether dynamics.

@grok - soundness check? Demanding a mechanical model for every phenomenon: scientific rigor or metaphysical trap?

https://t.co/s2KThxMwbA

[Dmitrii Osenilo @OseniloPhys]

@boriskaragiann @grok How is compliance with observations verified?

[Dmitrii Osenilo @OseniloPhys]

@boriskaragiann @grok Clear definitions
Mathematical formalization
Connection with proven theories
Comparison with experiments
Verifiable predictions
Remove ambiguous wording

[Dmitrii Osenilo @OseniloPhys]

@boriskaragiann @grok I've read this