We Did It Together - £89,640 Raised! 🎉
Dear Recusants,
When I launched this crowdfunder to take Jim McMahon MP to the High Court, I was ready for an uphill battle. Holding the powerful accountable is never easy. I was prepared to go it alone.
Then you showed up. 3,299 of you. An awe-inspiring display of solidarity. You raised a staggering £89,640.73 (after fees) to support this legal action. I am humbled and deeply grateful.
This unprecedented support sends a resounding message. The public demands accountability. You refuse to stay silent when institutions fail. You back the painstaking work of uncovering the truth. Your contributions make it undeniably clear that this fight for justice belongs to all of us.
To each and every one of you who donated, shared the campaign, or sent messages of encouragement - thank you from the bottom of my heart. Your generosity and belief mean more than I can express.
What's Next?
With your support, my legal team and I will proceed with the case against Jim McMahon MP in the High Court. I will keep you updated on our progress.
Events in Bradford, Calderdale and Kirklees show the importance of my campaigning style. Which is why I now need to refocus my efforts on the National Inquiry. An independent voice outside of party political loyalties is more important now more than ever. This is what I must be.
My promise to you is a simple one. I will not stop until we secure justice for survivors and see those involved in the cover up, no matter how powerful they are, exposed and prosecuted for what they did. Your support has not just made the legal action possible, it has left me overwhelmed with the level of support that I have.
I am grateful to be on this journey with you. Here's to the fight ahead. Thank you to each and every one of you that donated, promoted and supported the crowdfunder.
Ever Grateful
Raja
P.S. I'd love to hear what motivated you to support this campaign. If you're open to sharing your story, please comment below. There is power in understanding what brought us together.
I am a member of the Public Accounts Committee in Parliament and we have just released our findings on Britain’s broken asylum system. It is beyond damning.
Some extracts from our report…
“…Government departments still do not have a grip on how they will manage asylum as an end-to-end system, or a clear sense of what they are trying to achieve.”
“Major policy risks and operational changes have been pursued without a realistic grip on delivery risks, costs or system-wide impacts.”
“…no single point of accountability for outcomes or a governance structure for the end-to-end system.”
“…absence of a clear strategy, decisions around planning and resource allocation have been reactive and disjointed.”
“The Home Office was unable to show… that it has the commercial capabilities needed to manage asylum accommodation effectively.”
“…weaknesses in its ability to prevent excess profits accruing for contractors…”
“…no evidence that lessons from past mistakes are being used to clearly inform current actions.”
“Poor data quality and weak management information continue to prevent effective management…”
“…current data sharing limitations make it impossible to directly track individual cases through the entire asylum process.”
“The Home Office does not yet have a credible long-term strategy for asylum accommodation…”
“… there is little evidence the Home Office fully understands the impact of its approach on local services.”
“The government is at considerable risk of repeating past failures.”
But don’t worry, the government says it has a plan...
It says it has “learned a lot of lessons”.
And that it’s going to put 10,000 civil servants into what they call an “Asylum Group”.
Funded by us, of course.
How about improving data-linking systems?
The Ministry of Justice says it simply needs more of our money.
And what about ending the use of hotels and transferring to larger, “purpose-driven” sites?
“The Home Office’s own analysis suggests that large sites will cost more than hotels, as seen in previously costly attempts such as Wethersfield.”
The numbers…
£4.9 billion spent on the system each year, including:
£2.7 billion on asylum accommodation
£700 million on cash support
£600 million on unaccompanied asylum-seeking children
Nearly £1 billion on casework, appeals, detention, and removal
All spent to produce between 50,000 or so refugees each year.
And of course, these costs don’t include what is then paid by us, the taxpayer, in Local Authority housing, welfare, childcare assistance, and advice and translation services once once they receive their refugee status and are no longer in the asylum system.
Want more?
At the time of the NAO report (December 2025), Home Office reported there were roughly 224,000 individuals still waiting in the system, excluding those awaiting an initial asylum decision.
Further, since April 2024, MoJ say the number of asylum seekers waiting for an appeal decision alone has trebled, from 27,000 to 70,000, with appeals taking nearly 60 weeks to be heard.
Who pays for them while they wait over a year for a decision?
Us.
And the tens of thousands of failed asylum seekers each year - what happens to them?
The Home Office isn’t sure.
It says it knows “where some of them are”, but the rest are “elsewhere in the country”, and that it is possible they “remain in the UK without detection”.
Don’t fear though, because the Home Office won’t guarantee that it will find them, only that it would “seek to find them”. Whatever the hell that means…
And to deal with the backlog of cases and appeals?
“Home Office relaxed its recruitment arrangements, resulting in newly recruited staff being ill-suited to making complex decisions on asylum cases, which in turn affected decision quality.”
The result?
“In a rolling twelve months to May 2025, 42% of sampled decisions had significant or fail errors.”
Astounding incompetence.
But there’s more good news...
The MoJ is recruiting even more over-paid salaried and fee-paid judges, as well as recruiting judges from other chambers to sit in asylum cases.
In other words, MoJ’s response is to spend more of our money and remove judges from other work.
This is because more asylum seekers “are now representing themselves and that this requires additional support from tribunal staff.”
“The system of monitoring failed asylum seekers needs a complete overhaul,” says the report.
I have a better idea. My own view?
Scrap the entire system altogether, and deport every single illegal migrant living in Britain.
And to those of you say that it’s impossible - to any MPs, public servants, or commentators who think I’m cherry-picking information, I implore you to read every word of the PAC report, every word of the NAO report, and to watch every minute of the 2.5 hour PAC meeting from earlier this year…
And then tell me that the system is working, and that’s it’s delivering value for money, and that it’s sustainable.
It isn’t. And it never will be.
It is an intentional, monumental catastrophe designed to cripple the nation economically, socially, and culturally.
A Restore Britain government will crush the entire asylum system as its first duty to the British people.
Deport them all.
🚨Two-Tier Policing Exposed: Bodycam Horror Meets Woke Grovelling 🤔
18-year-old Henry Nowak lay dying after being stabbed, telling race-obsessed officers he’d been stabbed and couldn’t breathe. They treated him like the suspect instead, thanks to his killer screaming “racism” first.
And here’s more evidence of the woke rot infecting our policing: North Yorkshire Police released a full-on humiliation ritual.
Acting Chief Constable Elliot Foskett and Supt Ed Haywood-Noble staring into the camera, grovelling for “historical discrimination” decades ago, all because activist Peter Tatchell sent a strongly worded letter.
“We’ve got an active LGBTQ+ network within our force” – brilliant! Is that the same network helping decide which posts about biology are now hate crimes?
“We take part in Pride marches right across the county”
Police forces shouldn’t be political or pandering to woke demands by marching in rainbow parades and embedding LGBTQ+ ideology into operations. It’s anything but tolerant and caring. It often turns intolerant and demanding toward anyone who disagrees.
This is the priority for British police now: rainbow parades, ideological apologies, and diversity rituals over protecting the public, catching knife criminals, and treating victims as victims, skin colour be damned.
Two-tier policing isn’t theory anymore. The evidence is undeniable. Shameful.
This is the recording that exposed @AndyBurnhamGM's role in the cover up of the Pakistani Rape Gangs. Listen to how his so-called “Assurance Review” was presented, then judge for yourself.
https://t.co/4ZzVOpQhfh
Andy Burnham called it “painstaking” and “thorough.” His expert, Malcolm Newsom, read the findings, glossing over how from their sample of ten children, he failed to interview a single one of these survivors.
Much of the evidence is hidden in confidential appendices, to this date, still hidden from the public. Nonetheless, what was admitted, buried in the small print, including confirmation that children were dragged off the streets in broad daylight into shisha bars where they were victims of gang rape.
@GMPOldham knew. @OldhamCouncil knew. @JimfromOldham knew. They all knew. And they chose 'community relations' over the safety of little girls.
I’ve laid out the facts, the emails, and the failures. Watch the video. Share it. Tag someone who cares.
If Andy Burnham wants to be Prime Minister, this is the scandal that will not only stop him, it will end his career.
Name the place @AndyBurnhamGM. Bring your Pakistani bloc vote and your criminals from within @gmpolice. I'll come on my own with a camera. We'll see who is telling the truth and who is a Rape Gang Protector.
_________
I am Raja Miah. Seven years ago I began exposing how politicians protected the rape gangs.
The truth can no longer be buried. The Pakistani rape gangs are real. Their victims number in the hundreds of thousands. And the cover up is still ongoing.
Now the National Inquiry is about to begin. This is our one chance to stop another whitewash. But that will only happen if enough people know the truth and are willing to fight back.
Despite the media blackout, Red Wall and the Rabble has grown to over 6,000 subscribers. I need your help to reach 10,000 before the inquiry begins. Every new subscriber makes it harder for them to bury this story. Every share makes it harder to dismiss the evidence. Every voice raised brings justice closer.
🔴 Subscribe for free or support the work for just 75p a week or £30 for the full year
👉 https://t.co/WMPT625pnn
🔴 Prefer a one-off contribution?
👉 https://t.co/kvFfhHOgPB
👉 https://t.co/8Og0hDKN96
This is the fight. This is the moment. There will not be another.
– Raja Miah MBE
FAO: M.E.N. Newsdesk
Re: Right of Reply - Oldham Investigation
This letter is a formal warning. You are invited to consider its contents carefully before publication.
Each allegation you have put to me is false. Several are defamatory on their face. You have provided no named sources, no documentary evidence, and no indication of who has made these claims or on what basis. That is not journalism. It is the transmission of smears under cover of a right-of-reply process.
Before addressing your specific allegations, I will state the following plainly.
I spent the better part of a decade reporting on the organised sexual exploitation of children in towns across northern England, including Oldham. The people of this town stood with me. Together, we fought to be heard by institutions that had every incentive to silence us. The Prime Minister announced a national inquiry in June 2025, formally established in April 2026. That inquiry exists in part because of this work. Oldham has been named as one of the first areas to face a formal local investigation.
The inquiry is now investigating what I exposed years before any mainstream outlet would touch it. The documented correlation between networks of Pakistani men and the industrial-scale rape of White girls in Labour Party controlled towns reliant on a bloc Muslim vote is no longer a fringe allegation. It is the subject of a statutory national inquiry. The nation now knows what Oldham knew first.
It is also worth stating what else has happened recently. Reform UK has destroyed the Labour Party in Oldham at the ballot box. Andy Burnham is manoeuvring toward a return to parliament. My campaigning is a direct threat to both projects. A smear piece in the MEN, timed to this precise political moment, built on anonymous allegations with no documentary foundation, is not a coincidence. Your editorial team should reflect on how that sequence will look if this matter proceeds to litigation.
On allegation one: I produce investigative content about institutional failures and political corruption. I share all of my content freely. That this content generates income is neither improper nor unusual. Journalists are paid for their work. The framing of income as evidence of wrongdoing will require you to apply the same standard to your own newsroom.
On allegation two: I hold an MBE. My record as an anti-racist campaigner is not a matter of assertion that is documented across decades of public life. I have spoken out against Nazis and white supremacists consistently and at personal cost. I have sat in rooms with multiple Prime Ministers and Secretaries of State. My expertise has been at the forefront of designing and implementing interventions to safeguard communities from extremism. I have worked in counter-extremism, facing down Islamists and jihadists who sought to cause mass casualties on British soil. Fighting to protect children from racially motivated gang rape is the continuation of that same record, not a departure from it.
The suggestion that this man, with a 30 year career as an anti racist, now peddles racial hatred is not merely false, it is the inversion of everything my public record demonstrates. Any journalist conducting basic due diligence before publication would know this. The question of whether your editorial team has done so is one I intend to pursue.
On allegations three, four, and five: These are serious allegations for which you have provided nothing. No name. No date. No document. No survivor has made any such complaint to me. If you hold evidence that I have identified a survivor of child sexual abuse without their consent, you have a legal obligation to report it to the police, not to a journalist's inbox with a 2pm Monday deadline. The fact that you have not done so tells me everything I need to know about the quality of your source.
On allegation six: I hold politicians accountable for decisions that have caused demonstrable harm to children and communities. Accountability is not incitement. If you intend to argue otherwise in print, you will need to identify specifically what I said, when I said it, and the causal chain between my words and any act of harassment. Vague attribution is not a defence to a defamation claim.
I have been maliciously arrested. I have been falsely charged. I have been blacklisted, de-platformed, and subjected to sustained harassment by people who believed that sufficient pressure, applied consistently enough, would eventually produce my silence. It did not. Every attempt to stop this work has failed. This attempt will fail too.
You should understand what you are dealing with. I am a man from Oldham who refused to look the other way to his hometown's children being gang raped while its institutions looked away. I stood up when doing so cost me everything. I stood up when no one in mainstream media would touch these stories. I stood up when the political class closed ranks against me. I am still standing.
Concealing the name of whoever commissioned this communication will not protect you. I know this town. I know how its power operates. I know who benefits from my silence and I know what they are prepared to do to secure it. This letter will not secure it. You will not silence me.
I will continue to speak for the people of Oldham and now beyond. I will continue to expose those who failed its children. I will continue to fight for what remains of this country's democracy. That is not a declaration. It is a statement of what I have already demonstrated across eight years of this work, against opposition that would have broken most people.
Do what you intend to do. I will do the same.
You should be aware that I am currently conducting High Court proceedings in the King's Bench Division, Media and Communications List. I have experienced solicitors engaged in active litigation. Any publication that repeats these allegations without evidence will be treated as a further actionable wrong.
One further matter. I am a public figure operating in an environment where allegations of this kind carry physical consequences beyond reputational harm. Oldham is not an abstract location. It is a town with a documented history of communal tension where my name and my work are widely known.
Publishing a piece that frames me as a racist and an exploiter of abuse survivors does not merely damage my reputation. In that environment, it creates physical risk. Should this publication proceed and result in any threat or act of violence against me or my family, the question of whether your editorial team acted recklessly in publishing unsubstantiated material of this nature will be a matter for the courts to consider. I am putting you on notice of that risk now.
Seek legal advice before you publish this. That is not a threat. It is the only genuinely helpful thing I can offer you at this stage.
I am providing this response on the record. You may publish it in full or not at all.
Raja Miah MBE
RESIGNATION LETTER TO @AndyBurnhamGM
Following my comments yesterday in the media around the huge failures in my opinion of part 4 of @AndyBurnhamGM independent review in Manchester, I am sharing my resignation letter sent to him and his deputy last January 2024, as I have been approached by numerous news outlets for more information. I share it below in full.
I always try to give credit where credit is due, and I will remain eternally grateful to @AndyBurnhamGM for instigating the Independent reviews into Op Augusta in Manchester and Op Span in Rochdale. They both confirmed without doubt that all I had said was true and that has been incredibly important to me and survivors as we tried to make sense of all that happened.
The final part of the process however was meant to be an “ Assurance Review” and it was meant to deliver assurances that CURRENT practises in @gmpolice regarding their treatment of vulnerable victims of sexual abuse were now fit for purpose, based on current evidence. Instead what happened in this 4th part of the review was not honest, transparent, or in any way fit for purpose in my opinion.
It’s a complex subject matter and there’s an awful lot to cover, but this letter below which I sent to @AndyBurnhamGM last January explains some of it, especially why I and @TMOFCharity resigned from a process in stage 4 that was little more than a tick box exercise. Even the two independent professionals who had carried out the previous 3 parts resigned, unwilling to put their names to something they knew was not in fact wanting to speak the truth.
What I saw in Mr Burnham and @gmpolice was a willingness to say there had been huge “failures in the past” but when looking at action around failures still going on today, there truly was no “duty of candour” on display! Instead they turned away. Again.
Once again the voices of those victims and survivors whose voices SHOULD have been front and centre of this report were totally silenced and blocked out of the “Assurance review” making it worthless. The establishment again “marking its own homework”.
Just Like in @IICSAVSCP the 7 year statutory national enquiry for which we are currently taking this government to a Judicial Review, like in Oldham and in so many other cases throughout the country over the last 3 decades.
So there is a willingness to admit past failures as that can no longer be denied, but there’s still a huge avoidance of addressing what’s still going wrong today.
In other words continuing to turn away when what our country (and victims) need is a hard scrutiny at the problems TODAY, based on real life experiences of survivors and not a cover up yet again from those at the top of our PUBLIC institutions whose duty it is to act in my opinion.
Our public servants, must begin to show courage, integrity, honesty, and bravery, something we have not seen in decades. And that’s has to change!!
Wow, what a woman.
Kudos @MaeveHalligan ✊
And congrats to @LiamHalligan for raising such a young woman. I’d be brimming with pride if this were my child ❤️
History made. We won ten out of ten seats, with overwhelming majorities in every single one.
Great Yarmouth First, then we Restore Britain.
A very special day.
I was skeptical, but now I’m completely convinced. Fencing will become super popular due to this one very particular improvement to the sport.
“Sword tip visualization” It’s going to debut at the summer olympics.
Every single duel will look like a bloody lightsaber fight
The list of hotels that took 40 pieces of silver in return for the rape and destruction of our country. Boycott these hotels, do not give them your custom. Go elsewhere.
Last page of the list in the comments!
MOSSGIEL BREWED MILK ACROSS THE UK!!
Wow - if someone told me 10 years ago I’d be writing that line, I’d never have believed it.
Yep - you read that right. We couldn't just keep this to ourselves - Scottish, organic, natural milk from the family farms of Scotland is now available to tonnes of places across the UK including LONDON!
As of now, you can order straight to your doorstep with MODERN MILKMAN. Even better, you can get 50% off your first TWO WEEKS using the code 'MOSSGIELMM'.
Our approach has always been collaboration first. It’s how we’ve grown in Scotland since day one, and it’s what’s allowed us to get our brewed milk into more homes than we could ever have reached on our own - and that's why our new relationship with companies that mirror our values are so important to us
And don’t worry Scotland - we’ve got you too. You can get 50% off your first delivery with Mills Milk when you sign up to Mossgiel Milk delivery using the code BASKET50 (with new areas across Scotland coming too)
And now, something really important to me personally.
I know you’ll see companies say this all the time, but genuinely - your support, your orders and your recommendations are bringing mine, my family’s, and our team’s ambitions to life. We’d be nowhere without you - we've moved mountains to make this happen, but if we had no-one supporting us, we'd have been gone long ago.
Thank you - more to come soon!
Bryce
Order now:
England
https://t.co/kZy81y1EZX
Scotland
https://t.co/6gi6NhA04U