Dean Parrington

Professionally diagnosed madman, self diagnosed genius.

[Dean Parrington @ParringtonDean]

nigga what

[Secular Talk ([email protected]) @KyleKulinski]

Platner could’ve sexted my mom and I’d still vote for him

[Dean Parrington @ParringtonDean]

@PinkneyAtLarge Can’t stop doing something you never started to begin with…

[Dean Parrington @ParringtonDean]

Okay that’s fair enough but I literally never once said the first comment was anything the police would investigate so I don’t know what point there is to be made there. My initial comment expressed my indifference towards one shitty person being threatened by another shitty person, it had absolutely nothing to do with legality whatsoever.

[Dean Parrington @ParringtonDean]

@VelcroShoeLaces @ontheflipsiide Freedom of speech is exactly why a person saying they're going to start planning a school shooting, would need to attempt to purchase a weapon, or show any red flags beyond speech of that plan having begun to form, before something legally actionable would happen.

[Dean Parrington @ParringtonDean]

@VelcroShoeLaces @ontheflipsiide The initial argument you made was about this being "legally actionable" and if investigators don't find any actions or a person's identity associated with a social media account to investigate, there's not much of anything legally actionable for them to work with.

[Dean Parrington @ParringtonDean]

@ParringtonDean @ontheflipsiide No, I'm defending people's freedom of speech.

Saying "abort all male babies" is protected speech just as "kill all Nazis" is.

But saying "I'm gonna buy a gun, pick a school, shoot all the girls I see and enjoy doing it," isn't.

Still not sure how you don't see the difference.

[Dean Parrington @ParringtonDean]

@VelcroShoeLaces @ontheflipsiide And you’re “weirdly defending” the person who wants to abort all male children, you dork.

[Dean Parrington @ParringtonDean]

@VelcroShoeLaces @ontheflipsiide Considering that legality of abortion varies from state to state, a comment about aborting all male children could very well be investigated, depending on the state the poster lives in, so both could be flagged for an investigation and potentially dismissed for various reasons.

[Dean Parrington @ParringtonDean]

Well I never at any point said the first comment was legally actionable or any violation of the law...

As far as the second one being legally actionable; that depends on what you mean and would largely be contingent on a variety of other factors. If the person was investigated and showed no other signs of potential violence besides online posts, no weapon ownership, no prior violent history, no one L/E talks to claims they're physically violent or make these types of threats in person, the likelihood of being arrested of being arrested solely for online posts/messages is very low. An AI search says arrests for online posts are very rare and almost always will need additional factors. https://t.co/ypVBWtpCLF

[Dean Parrington @ParringtonDean]

@VelcroShoeLaces @ontheflipsiide No actually I didn't, but you're ignoring the relevant context of what the person was replying to in the first place, and acting as if the DM exists in a vacuum, prompted by absolutely nothing.

[Dean Parrington @ParringtonDean]

@VelcroShoeLaces @ontheflipsiide Person A says "I'll abort if it's a boy, kill all male infants", so Person B replies "I want to shoot up a girl's school, kill all females" and your running around acting as if the second statement isn't in retaliation to the first. Delusional.

[Dean Parrington @ParringtonDean]

@Krewnn0 @ontheflipsiide Posting that all unborn male infants should be killed right before receiving a hate message trying (and succeeding) to upset you is important context to know, that doesn't mean I'm making a justification for death threats.

[Dean Parrington @ParringtonDean]

@VelcroShoeLaces @ontheflipsiide So when OP posts about aborting all male infants, it's just a silly shit post to you dorks, but a hateful DM in response is 100% an actionable threat. These are just rules that only apply when you want them applied.

[Dean Parrington @ParringtonDean]

@VelcroShoeLaces @ontheflipsiide Yeah, because “shut the fuck up” is such a thought provoking erudite comment, which warrants a well thought out response. Holy shit you’re fucking retarded.

[Dean Parrington @ParringtonDean]

@Krewnn0 @ontheflipsiide I didn’t send the DM, dipshit.

[Dean Parrington @ParringtonDean]

@Nygma619 1. You provided one example so that’s what I was responding to, genius.

2. If you’ve read enough of their articles & truly don’t know the side they lean, you’re beyond helping.

[Dean Parrington @ParringtonDean]

For Democrats in 2012, just “running a campaign” was saying your milquetoast moderate opponent was going to bring back slavery.

[Roose @RuNoseP]

this is one of the funniest pieces of center-right cope. was Obama just not supposed to run a campaign?

[Dean Parrington @ParringtonDean]

@nottheb0reworms @ontheflipsiide Here’s the context OP that it takes 5 seconds to find, genius.

[Dean Parrington @ParringtonDean]

@Skater__Rebecca @ontheflipsiide

[Dean Parrington @ParringtonDean]

@Nygma619 Confirming a crowd picture is real isn’t the same as being their ideological shield, get real dude.