Philter

[Philter @Philteroo]

@mattkratter Yes, this is correct. A small dilution happened.

[Rupert Lowe MP @RupertLowe10]

Patriots - if you are protesting tonight, in Belfast or elsewhere, do NOT give Starmer what he wants.

Stay calm. Keep your heads. Do NOT attack the police.

The state will show you no mercy.

The dangerous ‘far-right’ will be blamed, and your life will be ruined forever.

It will be that brutal. However angry you are feeling now, it is not worth it.

Protest - but do it loudly, do it peacefully.

If the police are being aggressive, record it. Film it. Do not react. Because you will not be shown the same leniency as the officers. You will be charged, you will be sentenced, you will be imprisoned.

We’re all angry.

But you will achieve far more for our cause and country OUTSIDE of prison.

[Jack Posobiec @JackPosobiec]

BREAKING: SPLC paid for KKK cross burnings, robes and hoods, recruitment, living expenses, racist merch: explosive new indictment

https://t.co/MfVWHB363B

[Caolan @CaolanReports]

Lots of pro russian Irish people telling me to ‘go to the front lines & leave Ireland’

I’ve just come here from Nikopol. The press armour is still in my bag. I watched Russian drones hunt civilians with my own eyes. That’s why the indifference here is so despicable, especially while Ireland still supplies alumina to Russias war machine.

I’m not going anywhere. This investigation continues

[MJTruthUltra @MJTruthUltra]

Guys.. The Southern Poverty Law Center is so fooked

The DOJ literally has all their wire transactions, all their fake business, transaction dates, how the money was laundered, their names, how much their violent extremists got paid… they have it all. It is airtight.

This investigation began long ago.

[Jordan Tyldesley @PippyBing]

The core part of the Henry Nowak murder (the part we must not forget and must seriously engage with) is that his killer and family instinctively thought to fabricate a racism narrative because they knew it would give them an immediate advantage and invert the roles at the scene. And it worked exactly as calculated.

It has struck a raw nerve because it makes visible in the most repulsive way imaginable what many have long sensed, that accusations of racism have become a powerful, paralysing force in modern Britain eventually leading to a dying boy being sidelined while the system instinctively prioritised accusations of racism.

[Zia Yusuf @ZiaYusufUK]

I have written to Hampshire Police:

1) The body-cam footage directly contradicts the public statement made by Deputy Chief Constable Robert France.

DCC France claimed officers lacked "all of the information" and that Henry's injuries were hidden and internal.

The footage shows the opposite.

Before officers even handcuffed Henry, they were explicitly warned by a the murderer’s father that he had a "mouth full of blood" and couldn't hold himself up.

Henry himself clearly tells officers: "He stabbed me, I've been stabbed, I can't breathe."

The arresting officer's response?

"I don't think you have mate."

Henry was dragged across a driveway, handcuffed as a suspect rather than treated as a victim, and died minutes later. Judge Mousley KC’s sentencing remarks confirm Henry had a "clearly visible facial wound."

DCC France’s statement is misleading, indefensible, and a potential breach of Police Conduct Regulations. 

2) DCC France’s statement implies that the police considered it justifiable to take what was claimed by an ethnic minority family as absolute fact.

Upon being presented with a man that has a "mouth full of blood", that "keeps dropping side to side" and repeats "I've been stabbed, l've been stabbed, I can't breathe, the arresting officer's response was "I don't think you have mate."

Attending officers had more than enough information to treat Henry as the victim, not the suspect.

Hampshire Police’s "Race Action Plan" embeds anti-white racism in its operations, which today’s reports in The Times reveal has left rank-and-file officers feeling "controlled and pressured."

The Police Race Action Plan, launched under the Tory Government, demands that Police Officers “(do) not treat everyone the same”, nor be “colour blind”.

The public deserves to know:

How has this plan operationalised policing? 

We need answers.

WE WILL NOT LET THIS REST

[willo2 @willo2_Poly]

FYI: I fully intend to get paid out from my bet on Polymarket.

I bet $500K that Microstrategy had sold Bitcoin before May 31st.

In fact, they did. And there's no world in which you can argue that they didn't. Where's the money Shayne?

[tism @errolcart]

After today and watching events past few days, I've lost absolutely all trust in @Polymarket.

Will be moving my weather bot and money out of the platform and my trading as well.

"Microstrategy sells any bitcoin by May 31st" has just resolved to "NO".

What I saw today is amongst a handful of the most blatant alleged frauds I've seen from a platform this big to its users in this space.

Would be genuinely surprised if somehow this doesn't end up with much worse consequences for them.

As things are standing, I have no option but to conclude this is the start of their downfall and that another platform will take it's place. I'll /c this later.

Put simply but accurately: they changed the contract (buying shares with a set of conditions/rules) AFTER the agreement (purchase) and AFTER the date chosen had already passed (changed on june 1st, date was may 31st).

Imagine buying a lottery ticket, winning, and when you go to claim they tell you they've decided to change the numbers.

Disgusting and shameless are soft words for this.

Some, as myself, would also say illegal, but that's still to be proven in front of a judge.

It simply makes 0 sense to attempt any type of predictions in Polymarket, as the results of these prediction markets are not grounded in real events nor reliable sources, no matter how much they SAY they are (@arkham had recorded the sale on may 27th I believe), but on what the UMA holders find the most convenient at the time.

Just reading that paragraph makes me even more disgusted.

I can attempt to predict real life events, but I can't predict on what side of the bed the biggest UMA whale wakes up today.

Might as well change every question to "Will UMA holders resolve/decide to...."

After almost a decade of legal training, it's simply impossible for me to think this doesn't end in 1 or more lawsuits, and/or a class action.

There's simply too much evidence and too much money lost.

Of course it's not the first time something similar happens, but it is hands down the biggest and worst one.

Many lost it all.

A platform with a system that can't reflect the truth of events is unfit to be a prediction market.

If a blockchain like Solana wasn't capable of reflecting the truth of its transactions, it wouldn't exist.

Polymarket, in its current state, CAN NOT provide the service they claim they can provide.

The fact $UMA holders (-98% in price btw) coincide with truth is just a matter of intersection of incentives. When they're misaligned (as it happened today), the truth changes, and real life events don't matter anymore.

This is true I believe for any and all prediction markets in polymarket.

What was the most alarming was the changing of the rule on june 1st. Changed from "occurred" (sale) to "announced".

Becuase it leads me to believe there's a high chance it's not only UMA whales in this fiasco, but polymarket changing the frame (mid bet!!!) to cater them as well.

I'm not leaving my money in the hands of a handful of UMA whales 1 minute more. I really wish it wasn't this way.

I didn't really lose anything, unlike others.

I'm just mostly disappointed, and I must embarrasingly admit a little heartbroken.

Seems like just another rigged game.

It would seem as if reality didn't matter in polymarket, only how much a handful of big players stand to gain.

[0xDinosaur @0xDinoCrypto]

I’m 20 years old, still a university student.

Before this dispute, I was one of the top 10 YES holders in the Polymarket MicroStrategy market. I lost around 35,000 USDC because I trusted the written rule.

The rule said YES if MicroStrategy sold Bitcoin by May 31.

It did not say the sale had to be publicly disclosed by May 31.

That is the whole issue.

If you want to help:

Repost this.
Tag a journalist.
Tag a lawyer.
Send this to a crypto researcher.
Submit your case if you were affected.

https://t.co/pmXUtr9jFD

Silence is what platforms count on.

Don’t give them that.

[Caolan @CaolanReports]

Every sign at this refinery in Ireland is in russian. The official website is a .RU domain.

There’s no reason to hide it because local politicians are openly doing it for them.

[pagliacci the hated 🌝 @Slatzism]

So, to summarize:

German homo gets famous for twerking on stage in a dress.

Becomes prominent LGBT activist.

Politicians love him.

Elected the official Gay Berlin Ambassador.

Gets arrested for child porn.

Judge: “Meh, it's ok. You didn't mean it.”

No jail time. $70/day fine.

Continues to do activism.

Is invited to play with kids in Japan on behalf of Germany's Foreign Office despite being a convicted pedophile.

Gets arrested for even more child porn.

[Horace Bastard Spellman @HoraceSpellman9]

The religious exemption for Sikhs to carry knives got this scum 10 years off of his prison term.

If you or I had brought that knife to the murder the starting point would be 25 years. For Sikhs it is 15 years.

Two Tiers.

[0xDinosaur @0xDinoCrypto]

Official Statement Regarding the Polymarket MicroStrategy Market

I have contacted multiple legal advisors, partners, and people familiar with crypto and prediction market disputes regarding the Polymarket market “MicroStrategy sells any Bitcoin by May 31, 2026?”

I accept that I took risk. My position was aggressive, and maybe I was greedy. But risk-taking does not change the facts, and it does not allow a platform to apply an unclear or unwritten rule after real money has already been placed.

The written rule said the market resolves YES if MicroStrategy sells any of its Bitcoin by the date in the title. It did not clearly say the sale had to be publicly disclosed by May 31, filed in an 8-K by May 31, or confirmed before the deadline. A sale date and a disclosure date are not the same thing.

If Polymarket intended this to be a disclosure-based market, the rule should have said so clearly. Ordinary users read “sells any Bitcoin by May 31” as an event-based condition, not a disclosure-timing condition. Any ambiguity was created by the market wording itself.

I purchased 49,695.76 YES shares for approximately 35,000 USDC. This is real money, and this issue deserves serious review. I will continue improving my legal materials, collecting evidence, and contacting relevant legal support. I will pursue this matter to the end through every available lawful channel.

I am not asking for special treatment. I am asking for the written rules to be respected, the facts to be addressed directly, and this market to be reviewed fairly.

Prediction markets only work when users can trust that words mean what they say.
@Polymarket @PolymarketHelp

[Lookonchain @lookonchain]

What was the impact of #Strategy selling 32 $BTC?

It made this guy lose $527K in just one day!

After #Strategy filed that it had sold 32 $BTC($2.47M), trader willo2 saw that the odds of #MicroStrategy selling $BTC before May 31 were still at 80% on #Polymarket.

So he went all in on YES, trying to capture the remaining 20% upside, and bet a total of $527K on YES.

But #Polymarket ruled that "Confirmation achieved outside of the market's time frame does not qualify" and is leaning toward resolving it as NO.

Trader willo2 lost everything.

https://t.co/qtBg4tfg4e

[Pranjal Bora 🧭 @Crypto_Pranjal]

This is the kind of luck I'm going through 😬

Looks like the MicroStrategy market on @Polymarket is going to resolve as NO.

And I'm sitting on 7,371 YES shares.

In my defense, I don't think the thesis was completely crazy.

The market rule simply said it resolves YES if MicroStrategy sells any Bitcoin by May 31.

Strategy's own Bitcoin purchases page later showed they sold 32 BTC: https://t.co/9gPqupWi0f

And an official SEC Form 8-K filed on June 1 also confirmed the sale: https://t.co/8d4qt96K9D

Within May 26 - May 31, 2026

What made me comfortable taking the trade was that nowhere in the main rule did it say the sale had to be publicly disclosed within a specific timeframe.

Maybe I'm wrong, and the outcome is the outcome.

But this is one of those losses where I can at least say there was a genuine reason behind the trade, not just a random rumor or reckless bet.

Yet somehow, 7,371 YES shares are about to teach me another expensive lesson.

[Pranjal Bora 🧭 @Crypto_Pranjal]

My issue isn't the outcome of the @Polymarket MicroStrategy market.

It's that the line:

"Confirmation achieved outside of the market's time frame does not qualify."

was ADDED LATER.

That single sentence changes the interpretation of the market.

If that line had been there from day one, I'm sure many traders, myself included, would've made different decisions or not taken the YES side at all.

[₿itcoin ₿eliever @BTCBeliever21]

🟠 ''MicroStrategy sells any Bitcoin by May 31, 2026?''

🏅 I became a top ~0.07% all-time trader ranked #1126 on @Polymarket with this trade, but there is an issue.

The outcome is a clear ✅ YES. But they ruled ❌ NO.

📄 @Strategy clearly states in the 8-K filing with the SEC that they sold 32 BTC in the month of May, 2026:

🪙 ''On June 1, 2026, Strategy announced updates with respect to its bitcoin holdings: 32 BTC sold''

📅 ''During Period May 26, 2026 to May 31, 2026''

🆕 The news was all over @X. Strategy sold 32 BTC! They sold last week, in May. There is no way around it.

👨‍🏫The rules on this Polymarket event are clear:

📃 ''This market will resolve to "Yes" if MicroStrategy sells any of its Bitcoin by 11:59 PM ET on the date specified in the title. Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".''

📃 ''The primary resolution source for this market will be information from MSTR and on-chain data, however a consensus of credible reporting will also be used.''

💹 The market rules point to when Strategy SOLD.

📢 Not to when Strategy ANNOUNCED the sale.

❌ Polymarket cancelled the outcome in contradiction to their own rules. The team made an executive decision on this. They resolved a clear YES, into a shocking NO.

🏆 I was the #1 holder of this market until the dispute. I also was the initial disputer of the NO outcome.

🔎 I ask for @Polymarket to seriously investigate this.

And could I maybe get my $750 dispute bond back? 😅

[Samara Gill @SamaramGill]

SHOCKING details read out by father Mark Nowak regarding the murder of his son Henry.

- As blood filled his chest, Henry Nowak tried desperately to escape. Instead, he was chased and subjected to further abuse.
- When police arrived, Henry was lying on the ground, unable to sit up and clearly suffering severe medical distress.
- With his final words, he told officers nine times that he could not breathe.
- He also repeatedly told them that he had been stabbed four times.
- One officer responded: “I don’t think you have, mate.”
- Police later claimed they had been misled by the murderer.
- Henry’s father, Mark Nowak, believes the truth is far simpler.
- Both Henry and a member of the public who called 999 told police that Henry had been stabbed.
- Despite these warnings, officers failed to believe them.
- Henry was dragged across gravel and placed in handcuffs.
- Police arrested Henry for assault and read him his rights. According to his father, those were the last words Henry heard before he died.
- Mark Nowak says his son was denied even the dignity of a proper death.
- Henry should never have died on the streets of Southampton while in police custody.
- Meanwhile, his killer, Vikram Digwa, was afforded a level of decency that Henry was not. Reports suggest he was not even handcuffed when arrested.
- Officers reportedly took Digwa to the kitchen and allowed him to choose his own food.

[Miss Jo @therealmissjo]

Unbelievable.

Simply unbelievable verdict yesterday.

What is happening in Belgium?

On April 2, 2024 during the Easter Holidays a 14 year old girl went to the fairground with her 16 year old boyfriend in West Flanders, Belgium.

Afterwards, he invited her to go to the woods with him where he raped her.

Little did she know that he had invited his friends and that not only did they watch but after the rape, he “loaned her out” to his friends and they took turns in raping her too.

She screamed and was “in obvious pain” according to one of the boys but they did not stop. In total 9 boys aged between. 11 years old and 16 years old put her through a terrifying ordeal.

The boys were not named but were reporting as being “of North African or Somali descent”, with the boyfriend being from Somalia.

The rape was filmed and disseminated on Snapchat, tormenting the girl yet further.

The juveniles were tried and the verdict was delivered yesterday, 29 May 2026.

The 9 boys were found guilty of “repeated gang rape with aggravating circumstances and violating the victim’s sexual integrity”.

Their punishment? Hardly anything.

No custodial sentence was imposed - as Belgium instead prefers to focus on re-education and “guidance”. There is the possibility of a payment to the girl but this has not been disclosed.