Proving Islam

[Proving Islam @provingislam]

The rabbis imagine that David "challenged" God, asking "why is it that everyone that loves you is poor?"

Regarding the ayah وَقَالَتِ ٱلْيَهُودُ يَدُ ٱللَّهِ مَغْلُولَةٌ, many exegetes said it regards the jews saying Allah is cheap with them and does not spend on them. Subhanah.

[Proving Islam @provingislam]

Per this clear hadith, Quraysh believed that their gods were owned by Allah.

This refutes those who try to use the “independent power” cheatcode to justify their shirk.

[Proving Islam @provingislam]

Babylonian Talmud: God appeared to Sennacherib as a man, told him to bring him scissors so he can shave his beard, and then caused his beard to catch on fire.

[Alyasa' @ytrihs]

🧵A thread on another elegant point of qur’ānic intertextuality: Sūrah Yūsuf's Overlooked Structural Anomalies

[Proving Islam @provingislam]

According to this rabbinic text, God doubted his own judgement.

Thinking that perhaps his past judgements had been oppressive, he asks Abraham to examine his previous judgments, and teach God if God made any mistakes.

Very theologically problematic.

[Proving Islam @provingislam]

@b_Manono Because he is the Messiah so he will come back to defeat dajjal, establish a rule, and then die.

Then after his death at some point the hour will come and Allah is the onw who will raise the dead and judge them.

[Proving Islam @provingislam]

Check out this new Debate on: “Is Jesus God?”!!

This was so embarrassing for the Christian side. There’s no way around it: Jesus was only a messenger!

https://t.co/jDdfNmMobd

[Proving Islam @provingislam]

@Alfredovich65 @AEnjoyer447201 As specifically rejecting sonship for the yahud and nasara. Or saying they misunderstood it the language and went too far with it.

Divine sonship is condemned all over the Quran. For this other type of sonship there’s only one ayah so it’s not as much of a concern in comparison.

[Proving Islam @provingislam]

@Alfredovich65 @AEnjoyer447201 وَقَالَتِ ٱلْيَهُودُ وَٱلنَّصَـٰرَىٰ نَحْنُ أَبْنَـٰٓؤُا۟ ٱللَّهِ وَأَحِبَّـٰٓؤُهُۥ ۚ قُلْ فَلِمَ يُعَذِّبُكُم بِذُنُوبِكُم ۖ بَلْ أَنتُم بَشَرٌۭ مِّمَّنْ خَلَقَ ۚ يَغْفِرُ

So i often incline to take this as rejecting any such language.

But it may also be taken differently…

[Proving Islam @provingislam]

@AEnjoyer447201 They didn’t understand that in a divine sense.

[Proving Islam @provingislam]

@AEnjoyer447201 Sigh

[Proving Islam @provingislam]

@AEnjoyer447201 👍

[Proving Islam @provingislam]

@AEnjoyer447201 You seem to think having any description besides messenger makes you beyond a messenger. This is fallacious.

[Proving Islam @provingislam]

@AEnjoyer447201 they held it as plausible in the sense found in Deuteronomy and Isaiah, not in the divine sense

[Proving Islam @provingislam]

@AEnjoyer447201 None of that makes someone divine.

[Proving Islam @provingislam]

@AEnjoyer447201 Again, best the best of creation doesn’t make you more than a messenger. It doesn’t enter divine status.

[Proving Islam @provingislam]

@AEnjoyer447201 1- yes.

Re “plus”, any kind of divine son

2) ok define divine

[Proving Islam @provingislam]

@AEnjoyer447201 Again, beyond the best of creation doesnt mean you are beyond a messenger.

The ayah is saying jesus was not more than a messenger- that is to say, he does not enter divine status as the Nasara claim.

[Proving Islam @provingislam]

@AEnjoyer447201 Shadeedul quwa doesn’t make jibril worthy of worship nor make him more than a messenger.

I think you need to go back to Quran class- I’m genuinely advising this, not mocking.