@RepLeavitt You and other politicians, continually state public and private partnerships are great. Yet over and over can be found examples of where the private portion of the partnership turns out to have some level of nepotism or favoritism to a political ally. I can provide examples.
@RepLeavitt Ari, please take the following in the spirit intended. I’m trying to understand how and why a legislature funds what they fund. For example, as little as a 150 years ago, art was funded by the aristocracy. Why does the legislature feel the need to act like an aristocracy of old?
@KarenKeiser1 You are aware the South is on average more black than the rest of the country, right? And they are more obese than nearly every other demographic? And that obesity is a major factor in every health malady, including maternal mortality? Might explain the statistic.
@joekent16jan19@barnes_law@RStatecraft Joe Kent, more than anyone else, knows that we’ve intertwined our defense technology development with our NATO allies. Israel is more western than the United Kingdom. It might very well be a good idea to intertwine with Israel, especially since Iran is a common enemy.
@FmrRepMTG The US military is already integrated with all our NATO allies. Section 224 is just a good idea if we’re going to be working with Israel to eliminate the Iranian nihilist.
@RepAdamSmith Or you could reduce the demand by getting rid of all the illegals. Simple solution, but that would require you understanding the law of supplying demand which as a democrat socialist you don’t.
@RepAdamSmith The security guard praised Hitler and since all your most rabbit supporters support deleting Nazis, that’s at least one of three deaths that you should agree was not the victim of anti Muslim hate.
@KarenKeiser1 Karen, back when you were a younger woman, the Democrats had a representative out of Massachusetts, who was caught doing the wrong thing with male pages. After he was censored, the Democrats gave him a standing ovation. These guys are part of your group.
@45bestwords The quote you used comes from article 11 of the 1797 Treaty of Tripoli, a diplomatic agreement ratified by the US Senate and signed by President Adams. The context is diplomatic, not theological. The US was assuring a Muslim state that religion would not be a cause of conflict.