@BretWeinstein Thought experiment:
You're holding a contest, where billions of dollars go to the winner and everyone who plays has a stake. Do you
a) make it easy to cheat and impossible to verify if anyone cheats
-or-
b) make it as difficult as possible to cheat and easy to identify cheating
@bonchieredstate I'm not there. I don't think there are any benefits of the GOP winning, since Thune is just a Democrat in disguise so nothing would pass the Senate anyway, but what races do you see them winning due to "this environment"?
@bonchieredstate The really tupid thing about this is these guys are represented by a union, who *could* negotiate for a cut, but they get none of the blame for not doing so. It's so tiresome.
@JustineBateman There are tens or hundreds of millions of $$ that will be handed to liberal political operatives and orgs pretending there is an election, but it's really just an unboxing. But the money goes out, and the grift and fraud machine gets ever richer.
@politicalmath I'm just amazed that people still think that they are harvesting these votes.
They're not. Why would they? They can just claim anything they want and there's no oversight. No paper trail.
@KoxLevi@RonDeSantis You seem to be under the assumption that spending is mandatory.
It isn't.
You can spend less.
I know that thought is impossible for you to comprehend, but it is true.
@greendragonhq@ZeekArkham "The late surge came from Liberals who are more likely to vote by mail."
BS. If that was the case Bass would have gotten more votes too. But she didn't.
Obvious fraud is obvious.
@JAMIEMICAH3@walterkirn lol. Delusional cope there.
It’s not the result. Nobody is saying “How could Pratt lose?”
It’s HOW it happened. Had the votes come in normally nobody would question it.