In old days, PMs who resigned mid-Parliament usually stayed at least til next election. Churchill lasted til the third election after his resignation. But now we've had 3 PMs in 20 years - Blair, Cameron & Starmer - who've quit as MP within weeks.
One notable difference between Burnham and Starmer. Almost as soon as he became PM, Burnham talked strongly about his determination to put and end to rough sleeping and he's repeated that promise.
I don't recall Starmer ever talking in those terms.
@TedUrchin@topcat_terry@UKLabour Labour has real problems in knowing how to replace its leader. Tories have a clearer system - letters to the chair of the 1922 c'ttee etc. Labour has nothing similar. Too many MPs needed to support any challenger to Burnham due to Starmer's rule change. It needs to sort that out.
@timetoshine1234@SteveSmith_cam Politicians are allowed to change their minds. In Starmer's case, he changed it amazingly quickly.
But I think you misunderstood my tweet. I wasn't saying he shouldn't change his mind. I was just offering an opinion as to why others are criticising him. I hope that clarifies it.
@mbroschools@David__Osland It was only about two months ago that he promised to stay on as an MP until the next election. I don't think his house has been fire-bombed since then, has it?? ๐ค
@steverichards14 It is the truth, and also refreshing because no other prime minister has said it so clearly. I don't recall Starmer ever making that point at all.
I know Andy Burnham has made the point repeatedly in recent months.. but still refreshing to hear a prime minister in the Commons route UKโs problems in the 1980s (he also rightly cited Brexit)..refreshing because itโs the truth.
@AngelaYorks@PeterStefanovi2 Is that REALLY the best you can come up with? He's just given a very strong speech in the Commons and run rings round Badenoch, yet all you can do is nitpick about him not mentioning Starmer by name! ๐คฆโโ๏ธ
Starmers timing - creating a tricky by election on the day Burnham takes his seat in the Commons - smacks of petty revenge.
He prob never was the kind of decent guy he tried to paint himself as.
Starmers timing - creating a tricky by election on the day Burnham takes his seat in the Commons - smacks of petty revenge.
He prob never was the kind of decent guy he tried to paint himself as.
@oldishbird1 I expect him to want the Labour government to succeed and to avoid creating any unnecessary distractions.
That matters to me, not because I'm a Labour member (I'm not), but because the alternative is too grim to contemplate. And we were beginning to contemplate it back in May.
A lot of people on this platform currently seem to think that politics ought to be like a gentlemen's cricket match, not the rough old business it actually is. But as President Harry Truman once memorably said "If you can't stand the heat, get out of the kitchen"!
@timetoshine1234@oldishbird1 Depends on how much he wants to see the new Labour prime minister succeed in conveying his message for the country without any distraction, I suppose. I assume he still supports the Labour government. ๐ค