Ron

Marine Fires/Reqs O assigned to the USN with ADHD. Postings are my own opinions and don’t represent the USMC's,DoN's or the DoD's positions or opinions.

[Ron @RonMcLaughlin2]

Click here now! 😈👇🏻 https://t.co/AJDR4Bzb9K

[Kyle Seraphin @KyleSeraphin]

@Mrgunsngear Blind leading the blind. FBI special agent material, fu shu

[Ron @RonMcLaughlin2]

https://t.co/PLaQocWp6A

[Ron @RonMcLaughlin2]

Click here now! 😈👇🏻 https://t.co/AJDR4Bzb9K

[Ron @RonMcLaughlin2]

Say hi once you notice it for a DM

[Ron @RonMcLaughlin2]

Click here now! 😈👇🏻 https://t.co/AJDR4Bzb9K

[Ron @RonMcLaughlin2]

Say 'hi' for a special pic in your DMs today!

[Ron @RonMcLaughlin2]

hi

[Elon Musk @elonmusk]

Increasingly significant consideration

[Ron @RonMcLaughlin2]

@ADMMFG Planning at bring back to the 10 lug rail or just going to have the 13 lug XLR from now on?

[Ron @RonMcLaughlin2]

@DanielLDavis1 @19_forty_five slight correction, 155mm DPICM uses 2 bomblets.  The only difference between the two is 1 has pre-scored body to improve frag and the other is loaded at the base of the projectile with a solid body to withstand both the shock of firing and pusher plate driven ejection.

[Ron @RonMcLaughlin2]

@PHLexpat Which is it, we won't need to defend or we will to defend? I was told to evolve my thinking because defending is old think.

[Ron @RonMcLaughlin2]

@PHLexpat https://t.co/LjVjtPNPSq actually one of the best open sources analysis of the PLA amphibious forces and the PLAN-MC I have seen

[Ron @RonMcLaughlin2]

@PHLexpat @AMDuncan0 @OIECol @MAGTravF @WDMills1992 @BrianKerg @BA_Friedman @sean_thethinker @ian_tb03 @TECOM_USMC I am literally watching everyday how the post RET effort moving away from TLR produced by the RET.

The TLRs produced by the RET were what CD&I asked for, to include the ability to embark forces.

[Ron @RonMcLaughlin2]

@PHLexpat @AMDuncan0 @OIECol @MAGTravF @WDMills1992 @BrianKerg @BA_Friedman @sean_thethinker @ian_tb03 @TECOM_USMC So you need to look up the perceived uses for the PLA amphibious forces and why they differ from the PLAN-MC and their building of numerous expeditionary Bde equivalents.

[Ron @RonMcLaughlin2]

@PHLexpat @AMDuncan0 @OIECol @MAGTravF @WDMills1992 @BrianKerg @BA_Friedman @sean_thethinker @ian_tb03 @TECOM_USMC You actually have it backwards, the RET delivered what CMC wanted in the TLRs, the problem we are seeing now is "Big" Navy wants to gold plate and add survivability.

[Ron @RonMcLaughlin2]

@AMDuncan0 @PHLexpat @OIECol @MAGTravF @WDMills1992 @BrianKerg @BA_Friedman @sean_thethinker @ian_tb03 @TECOM_USMC Your snark and false belief does not change the fact the CONOPs being written and the equipping are exact opposite of what your believe them to be.

[Ron @RonMcLaughlin2]

@minnie_mag @BrownellsInc The irons are moving with the part that is moving.

[Ron @RonMcLaughlin2]

@AMDuncan0 @PHLexpat @OIECol @MAGTravF @WDMills1992 @BrianKerg @BA_Friedman @sean_thethinker @ian_tb03 @TECOM_USMC Please do, because defend was used in much of planning for GBASM and embarked was used for much of the planning for the LSM under the LAW program but since I did not see you at those RETs and OPTs you may not know that.

[Ron @RonMcLaughlin2]

@minnie_mag @BrownellsInc Since the barrel is fixed and means of aiming are in the moving part, the movement has does not effect the precision or accuracy