Poker is hard. You don't just track the cards, but also manage the beliefs of others, who are doing their best to manage yours. Economists have struggled with this type of problem since the '80s. I solved it for the types of models used in practice.
@ben_moll@YaleCowles@econometricsoc My experience is in HA partial information games not HANK, but for me, you have markov transitions for the state and each player's estimates of the shocks. When you do the bellman terms, you get shadow prices for moving the state and shadow prices for moving estimates
@ben_moll@YaleCowles@econometricsoc Now for nonlinear models, you've got the issue the the IRF's aren't deterministic so it's a bit more difficult, but there are a lot of linear phenomena not currently in the literature. I've got a somewhat janky example here: https://t.co/1Fx0hr5HlW
@ben_moll@YaleCowles@econometricsoc Great presentation. One minor note, it is possible to do dynamic programming with non-markov processes. You can turn any process markov by including the history in the state. Not sure how it works nonlinearly, but I've been able to get it tractable for LQG models
@mean_field_zane Is this not equivalent to saying that if two people start from different filtrations and then combine them (or equivalently, that your filtration or a sufficient statistic thereof is measurable to mine and mine to yours), that their estimates of anything would have to match?
@__paleologo When I saw that post, I bought the book and it became one of my favorites (thanks!). Iโll try out this one. Wouldnโt mind if you become a fiction recommendation account
@SandyofCthulhu If itโs a square board (side length s)and it takes a time to cut proportional to the length of the cut, then 15 is correct. First cut has length s, and second has length s/2. If it takes 10 minutes per s, then itโll take 15 minutes. Definitely not what the teacher was thinking
@quantian1 Yeah, youโre right. I was conflating a short period of high negative jerk then 0 with no third derivative just because it wasnโt a consistent effect
@alexolegimas Yes but some things are scarce due to technology and others are scarce due to politics. AI automation doesnโt make the politically scarce goods cheaper (housing etc) but it does make the technologically scarce goods plentiful. I donโt hear complaining about little access to those