Sarah Kliff

Investigations and health policy for the @nytimes. I like reading your medical bills.

[Sarah Kliff @sarahkliff]

@lawsonhmansell He didn't take the helicopter, so we'll never know!

[Sarah Kliff @sarahkliff]

NSA expert folks fact-check me here, but wouldn't the No Surprises Act prevent a surprise bill for air ambulance transit in a case like this??

https://t.co/OUnR7XHAUi

[Sarah Kliff @sarahkliff]

@danielfried I consider this sloth, once again belatedly, and I approve. Please consider this snuggle of sloths as my apology.

[Sarah Kliff @sarahkliff]

@ChildrenNeedUs_ @JasonSm32486931 @charlesornstein @nytimes I obviously can't speak to your friend (who sounds like he was very good at what he did!) but data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics suggests that the vast majority of surgical assistants make significantly less money. https://t.co/SLBPyuRYZT

[Sarah Kliff @sarahkliff]

Surgical assistants often earn $70,000 to $100,000 for helping doctors suture and retract.

Some are taking advantage of a consumer protection law to earn $210,000 for a single operation, we found in our new @nytimes investigation.

https://t.co/7aOs3XRivn

[Sarah Kliff @sarahkliff]

@DrJLozada @charlesornstein @nytimes There are issues with non-payment but hard to tell how pervasive they are since the government does not track it. We have had some plans tell us outright they do not play awards they consider "unreasonable," such as an award higher than billed charges.

[Sarah Kliff @sarahkliff]

@nocorporatemed Hi - want to shoot me a note? We're interested in better understanding issues with non-payment that we've heard about. [email protected].

[Sarah Kliff @sarahkliff]

Margot and I will be continuing to report on No Surprises Act this year. If you have a tip to share related to the law, get in touch! [email protected]

[Margot Sanger-Katz @sangerkatz]

@sarahkliff In our reporting, we found numerous examples where surgical assistants out-earned surgeons by using the NSA's arbitration system. For this scoliosis surgery, the assistant won 24x the main surgeon's fee.

[Sarah Kliff @sarahkliff]

@lkmcgann @msk Doesn't rival bat rabies bills, but we can always try our best!

[Sarah Kliff @sarahkliff]

.@msk & I dug into what surgical assistants are earning in No Surprises Act arbitration. We found surgical assistants' earning:
—$50,000 for a prostate surgery
—$100,000 for a breast reconstruction (just right breast, not left)
—$210,000 for a facial feminization procedure
https://t.co/FUDj9uBwMK

[Sarah Kliff @sarahkliff]

@BigBooleans @msk Our article mentions both of these things?

[Sarah Kliff @sarahkliff]

For context, surgical assistants typically earn $70,000 to $100,000 per year.

We found that some have used No Surprises Act arbitration to earn $22,000 per hour.

[Sarah Kliff @sarahkliff]

.@msk & I dug into what surgical assistants are earning in No Surprises Act arbitration. We found surgical assistants' earning:
—$50,000 for a prostate surgery
—$100,000 for a breast reconstruction (just right breast, not left)
—$210,000 for a facial feminization procedure
https://t.co/FUDj9uBwMK

[Tradeoffs @tradeoffspod]

Doctors are winning big paydays from insurers under a law intended to protect patients and rein in high prices.

@nytimes reporter Margot Sanger-Katz @sangerkatz talked with Tradeoffs about how this is fueling higher premiums.

Listen to today's episode:
https://t.co/HGyEzxpQZy

[Sarah Kliff @sarahkliff]

@stuartbuck1 @NYHammond @jbarro @sangerkatz It's still a bit a mystery to me fwiw - the same incentives seem to exist in Major League Baseball arbitration but the outcomes and bids are not nearly as disparate there as they are in NSA.

[Maya Kaufman @mayakauf]

New York will soon be a litmus test for politicians' appetite to reform this system.

@GovKathyHochul is trying exempt Medicaid claims from this kind of arbitration. Hospitals and doctors are fiercely lobbying against it, so lawmakers have been reticent to come on board.

[Sarah Kliff @sarahkliff]

The big surprise of the No Surprises Act: Doctors are cashing in on the consumer protection law, getting paid $440,000 for breast reductions and $14,000 for steroid injections.

Latest investigation with @sangerkatz: https://t.co/keJwqqAeLX

[Sarah Kliff @sarahkliff]

@mattyglesias Sprinklecare!! https://t.co/3HaJ0mPXh7

[Sarah Kliff @sarahkliff]

The Medicaid work requirement the House passed this morning is the strictest version of the policy that Congress has ever put forward.

Diving into the details with @sangerkatz:

https://t.co/ptCxQjDFtp

[Sarah Kliff @sarahkliff]

@mattyglesias Gotta get that take on the Weeds ASAP

[Sarah Kliff @sarahkliff]

Medicaid is a more cost-effective way to save lives than lots of other things the government pays for, like vehicle inspections or some cancer treatments.

More from me + @sangerkatz on a big new Medicaid study:

https://t.co/fQ7dl4PnmH