The Supreme Court’s 2025-26 term will likely be remembered as one of the most consequential in recent memory. This was certainly the case for President Donald Trump, who was the named party in four of the term’s biggest cases.
https://t.co/wFvHIkPMXN
For a taste of its findings, check out this animated explainer, the third in our series of animated videos done in partnership with Briefly.
https://t.co/4BTW9pkvJ4
More than 50,000 people joined @SCOTUSblog as they live blogged the final opinion day for the 2025-26 term.
Each weekday, the SCOTUStoday newsletter breaks down the news and commentary shaping the Court — smart, approachable, and straight to your inbox.
Subscribe today: https://t.co/uykEiKnTFb
This animated explainer, part of our partnership with Briefly, guides you through which justices dominated this term, which judicial alliances mattered most, and whether the court's so-called ideological divide is more hype than reality.
https://t.co/RA3Xjka2D8
More than 45,000 people joined us yesterday as we live blogged the court's final opinion announcement day for the 2025-26 term. Catch-up on the court's rulings and our coverage by reading this morning's SCOTUStoday newsletter.
https://t.co/WBdszdfYFl
Justice Kavanaugh filed an opinion concurring in the judgment and dissenting in part. Justice Thomas wrote a dissenting opinion, joined by Justice Gorsuch. Justices Gorsuch and Alito also wrote dissenting opinions.
The court strikes down President Trump's executive order on birthright citizenship, holding that children born in the U.S. to parents unlawfully or temporarily present are “subject to the jurisdiction” of the U.S. and are citizens at birth.
https://t.co/8hK8MQrNWN
The next opinion is in NRSC v. FEC, on campaign finance. The court holds that the Federal Election Campaign Act's political-party coordinated-expenditure limits violate the First Amendment.
https://t.co/9kMeYzuQZF
The vote count is difficult to summarize. Sotomayor wrote an opinion concurring in the judgment in part and dissenting in part, Kagan and Jackson. Jackson also wrote an opinion concurring in the judgment in part and dissenting in part.
The first opinions are in the transgender athlete cases. In B.P.J., the court holds Title IX allows schools to provide separate women’s and men’s teams defined by biological sex, and WV has permissibly maintained female sports for biological females.
https://t.co/PGDJDZG5nW
The court also holds that West Virginia and Idaho did not violate the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment by maintaining female sports teams for biological females. Justice Kavanaugh wrote the majority opinion.
With four cases left to decide, the court has indicated that today will be the final opinion announcement day of the term. We will be live blogging beginning at 9:30 a.m. EDT.
https://t.co/2Sk1OAAc4W
With four cases left to decide, the court has indicated that today will be the final opinion announcement day of the term. We will be live blogging beginning at 9:30 a.m. EDT.
https://t.co/2Sk1OAAc4W