Senko S.

I'm a virtual effigy surrounded by physical virtualities.

[Senko S. @SenkoS8]

@meadandjuniper If your father fails to slay the beast
you dont get to keep your sentimentality.

[Senko S. @SenkoS8]

@LukeWeinhagen Strong point.

No doubt consequences would change behavior.
But to even have acess to these consequences that habituate you into a commons is a matter of first principle decisions.

Who is not worthy to accept investments from ?
The answer splits society itself, permanently.

[Luke Weinhagen @LukeWeinhagen]

Just Like Me

The right does this "just like me" projection just as much as the left does - they just do it at a different point in the chain of behavior.

The left does "If they just had access to the benefits of pro-social behavior from my commons, they would behave just like me within that commons."

The right does "If they just had access to the consequences of anti-social behavior from my commons, they would behave just like me within that commons."

Same hubris.
Same intensity of projection.
Same results.

You give access to your commons to a bunch of people who do not value your commons enough to invest in and defend it, and that commons quickly becomes not worth investing in and defending.

[Senko S. @SenkoS8]

@GODFOE_UNIVERSE As a male in such a situation you have to explicitly draw attention to the "visage performance" of these actors.

They are bombarding social environments with "priming signals" completelly uncontested.

This is hooligan behavior against reciprocity itself.
Do not tolerate this.

[Senko S. @SenkoS8]

@SonderPatriot Erratic spike outs are just the natural phenotype of reactionaries.

If the burning of you fuel tank is the only thing that sets you on fire you will look for different fuel down the line.

No one can remain in a self righteous panic state forever.

[Henry Shevlin @dioscuri]

When my analytic philosophy friends complain about "corpo speak"

[Martin Štěpán @AutistocratMS]

@KemiBadenoch Identity politics doesn't divide the country, it identifies who's part and who is not. Universalism is suicide, equality a delusion.

[Senko S. @SenkoS8]

@PageTurnGoldSPY @asukagrypr Shame is for villages.
It does not scale on urban metropoles under capitalist reproduction.

[Senko S. @SenkoS8]

@RealChrisLangan Free enterprise and public commons are two paralel lines that no matter how close they come to each other, they can never meet.

Subjectivity then just gets to stretch and bend how it sees fit.

Fascists and communists were probably the only groups that accepted this reality.

[Senko S. @SenkoS8]

@culturaltutor Wrong.
The purpose of a system is what it does and not what it claims to be.

Over time its phenotype just expresses the undeniable truth that was there from the very beginning.

[Senko S. @SenkoS8]

@StanelyB75070 @martianwyrdlord Its not a historically accurate report about WIlliam Goldings true motivations.
I am affirming the analysis by claiming that the teachers deny a central aspect of the story for an emotional conditioning agenda. Effects > intent.

Still interesting trivia. Now i know. :]

[Senko S. @SenkoS8]

@RokoMijic You need selection pressures against negrophilic elements.
The ethnostate inherently obscures biological realities.
People preferences are their phenotype just as much as skin and hair color is. Even more.
Highly autonomous city states would probably be best.

[Annie? Rauwerda? @anniierau]

"why use google?" webpage from 1999

[Dr. Dad, PhD 🔄🔼◀️🔽▶️ @GarrettPetersen]

Possibly controversial take: If the humanities weren't totally taken over by women, there would be a body of research on men's issues, and a lot of it would look like an academic, serious version of various incel/manosphere theories.

[Senko S. @SenkoS8]

@JDHaltigan You dont refute social construction with scientific models.
They affirm in the guise of description.

You have to challenge the affirmation explicitly.

Their descriptions being wrong will never matter bcs they rule by consensus.

[Senko S. @SenkoS8]

@thltd_ All you do by combining breeding and money
is select money preference.

If you want the IQ
only allowing pregnancies by couples that pass a certain IQ test score would be a closer proxy.

But you will see that the high IQ people en mass bring their own dysgenic loop with them.

[Senko S. @SenkoS8]

@calotonterias Universal responses to the universal problem of entropy.
And another spear in the torso of social construction.

[Sergio Ferrero @calotonterias]

Los pollos prefieren las mismas caras que los humanos consideran atractivas.

Parece difícil pensar que lo hagan por constructo social.