Future X

CHRIST IS KING

[Future X @Sheik_elizzy]

“What shall we say about such wonderful things as these? If God is for us, who can ever be against us?” Romans 8:31 NLT

[Jerome Chukwuwem @JeromeChukwuwem]

The state of modern Dawah right now is NOT GOOD. 😗👇🏾👇🏾

[Future X @Sheik_elizzy]

@AxadJimco Nope, let him address dawah guys and their lies. You know he cooked Korra and she ran off. Korra making her career off Ladylogic.

I’m positive you’ve got no problem with that, bro 😎

[Future X @Sheik_elizzy]

@MIAWalmart @IslamicPackers @JayDyer Are you appealing to Muslim scholars or your god?

You can as well tell me your god was doing a “general confirmation” because scholars knows better than him.

That makes me wonder what gospel or Torah Allah made Waraqah write during pre-Islamic era as he willed

[Future X @Sheik_elizzy]

@MIAWalmart @IslamicPackers @JayDyer When Muhammad held the Torah close to his chest, he didn’t say Ibelieved in part and not whole Torah.

Muslims know better than their god who revealed and confirmed the Torah and injeel. He didn’t tell you to believe in part and ignore others.

[Future X @Sheik_elizzy]

@LibanG987 @IslamicPackers A false prophet who thought angels (spirit) are harmed by the smell of onions and garlic 🧄

[Future X @Sheik_elizzy]

@1Green_Rook @Ihunanya_chi You spit on your fellow countrymen over an Arab pedophile warlord. Your ancestors would be so proud of you, clown.

She didn’t say anything wrong. Muhammad would’ve been proud of them if he were alive today

[Future X @Sheik_elizzy]

Mark 13:30 cannot be read in isolation. In the same discourse, Jesus mentions events that occurred in the first century, including the destruction of Jerusalem and the Temple (Mark 13:2, 14–23).

Those things did happen within the lifetime of many in “this generation,” which is why many scholars understand Mark 13:30 as referring primarily to the generation that witnessed those events. I mentioned it earlier but you’re too slow to grasp. I won’t repeat myself the third time.

So it only proves that if Mark 13:30 refers exclusively to the final Judgment Day, then there would be a problem. But you first have to demonstrate that Jesus was speaking exclusively about the final Judgment Day rather than the destruction of Jerusalem or a mixture of near and distant events.

I’m waiting for a logical response unless you wouldn’t get a respond from me.

[Future X @Sheik_elizzy]

@AbdulHa17587691 @abdulbasit97841 Are you slow? I hate responding to people who find it difficult to comprehend simple sentences.

Read slowly this time around and say something sensible

[Future X @Sheik_elizzy]

@abdulbasit97841 @TommyCandlish Special pleading at its peak.

[Future X @Sheik_elizzy]

I guess you need more history knowledge on the fall of Jerusalem and the Temple in 70 AD

Even most scholars interpret this (Mark) as the Roman siege of Jerusalem. Jesus warns that when it happens, those in Judea should flee to the mountains instantly, without taking time to gather belongings.

How do you reconcile Muhammad’s prophesy on the Last hour since you thought the prophecy Jesus gave didn’t come to pass?

It got fulfilled. You can cope harder

[Darwin to Jesus @darwintojesus]

This is what atheists are missing.

https://t.co/l81cXKVFHo

[Future X @Sheik_elizzy]

Verbatim fallacy at play here. Give me a verse in the Quran where Jesus explicitly called Himself the “Messiah”, let’s see if you’re consistent in this argument!

The two natures of Christ arises from the NT because we can see Jesus exhibiting attributes associated with His humanity and attributes they belong uniquely to God.

You’re cherrypicking verses to claim He’s only a prophet who submits to God, but if I bring up verses He claimed to be God. You’re gonna dismiss it outrightly.

[Future X @Sheik_elizzy]

@notx998 @abdulbasit97841 He comes in the night every day and ask his slaves question

[Future X @Sheik_elizzy]

@DejidotIk @abdulbasit97841 @AbdulHa17587691 I remember Allah swearing by Lord of sunrise and sunset. I thought Quran was the uncreated Word of Allah (kalam) but he was speaking of another Lord.

[Future X @Sheik_elizzy]

So Jesus had to teach about the hypostatic union before they know He’s fully human and God? Didn’t the disciples see Him as both human while He claimed divinity in the NT?

If you don’t lack reading comprehension skills, you’d have seen I’ve addressed your argument.

You’re assuming that Christians begin with the hypostatic union and then force Jesus’ words to fit it. The doctrine (hypostatic union) is a theological description of truths found in Scripture.

[Future X @Sheik_elizzy]

Religion of peace wouldn’t give his food to kafirs (non believers)

“Give to those who ask, and don’t turn away from those who want to borrow.”
Matthew 5:42 NLT

“Give to everyone who begs from you, and from one who takes away your goods do not demand them back.” Luke 6:30 ESV

[Beloved of God @Edenlife9]

“If Jesus knew everything, why was he angry at the fig tree for not bearing fruits?”

[Future X @Sheik_elizzy]

Bird of a feather flock together lol. You don’t try to learn what Christianity actually teaches. If you’re critiquing a position Christians don’t hold, it makes your argument collapses.

The divine Son is fully God and human. His human nature included a human body and a human mind.

Luke 2:52 describes growth in Jesus’ humanity, not an increase in God’s knowledge. Jesus’ human mind grew in wisdom as part of His genuine human experience, while His divine nature remained unchanged.

I hope you learn something new today, bro

[Future X @Sheik_elizzy]

@AbdulHa17587691 @CjHammond31 @abdulbasit97841 Allah and his angels pray for Muhammad lol