18 bizarre/suspicious media behaviors in the Russini - Vrabel scandal. Did I miss anything?
1.) ESPN (10% NFL owned) virtually ignored it for 2 weeks
2.) Crickets at NFL Network
3.) CBS ignored it for 11 days
4.) Dan Lebatard says the story makes him "uncomfortable"
5.) Scott Zolak insinuates he would lose his job if he covers the story
6.) Two WEEI radio hosts in Boston do lose their job after covering it
7.) USA Today fires Crissy Froyd after she's critical of Russini
8.) TMZ originally turned the story down because it didn’t want to “police the bedroom”, but now covering it
9.) The Athletic originally stands firmly behind Russini, then investigates her
10.) ESPN doesn’t tweet its own eventual story on the scandal, instead having an account with 8k followers tweet it very late on a Friday night
11.) Adam Schefter 3+ hours late (after midnight) tweeting the news about Vrabel missing the NFL draft
12.) Kid Gloves - Failure by several outlets to cover the 2015 Russini incident, tampering angle, or COTY voting conflict of Interest
13.) First Take: "We didn't want to talk about it on this show"
14.) AP still no comment on Russini’s status as awards voter - even after getting called out by PFT
15.) Media figures attacking influencers who shine light on #12
16.) AP writes a story about Russini resigning, doesn’t mention she is one of their AP awards voters
17.) ESPN's 50M+ X account only tweeted the word "Vrabel" once since April 1st despite a controversy with his RB over a bible tweet, 2 press conferences, and 4 photo dumps by TMZ and others
18.) The same sports media outlets who were obsessed wih the "ColdPlay couple" (Even though it's not a sports story) are ignoring the Russini - Vrabel scandal completely.
It’s not your expression, it’s a machine given words that it uses to create a consensus of how other people have expressed it. Expression is your voice, not the voices of others serrated and dragged through a machine made to mimic your mouth. You express nothing, you forfeit your voice to allow the rest of humanity to speak for you. Here, you even say the ultimate goal is the erasure of human voices. Your “expression” leads to a lack of humanity, not a furtherance of it. Every iteration and invention of art has found new ways to allow us to culminate the human experience through sensation, but generative AI is cancer, it’s the cells of what we’ve already built spinning ad nauseam until all we “make” is what others have already made. It’s a dead end and lifeless, and goes against whatever spirit, soul, or God gave us the gift of creation in the first place.
@GuruFantasyWrld I mean Kincaid has a known PCL issue and they limited his snaps. When on the field he had a good target share but he just wasn’t on the field enough because of the injury
@PolarSodaCan@DeltaC7_@ButtClaps@Rothmus Yes she is human in a world full of hivemind. Humans are flawed. It’s hard to have character growth if you have no flaws.
@StickToTheModel Why does it say O’Cyrus Torrence is one of the Bills biggest misses? He has started every game since being drafted and is about to get a huge payday next year. Not a miss at all
Yeah let’s talk about how I’ve been voting at the same city hall since I was 18 just for me to get there and they ask if if Democratic or Republican and made me leave go to another location 20 mins away and had to wait in line for 2 hours and barely made it by the 7pm cut off.
Ai-generated artwork officially is ineligible for copyright protection as the US Supreme Court declined to review a appeal case.
The court rules that artwork needs to have a human creator in order to be eligible.
(Source: https://t.co/WnYEKs7IcB)
@Show_DeRosa@StickToTheModel Idk if I’d just ride with Kincaid, Hawes, and Latu at TE. If Knox goes I think someone has to be brought in during FA or the draft to compete with Latu at the very least