Joe DiMaggio easily had the craziest career path:
1936 - World Series
1937 - World Series
1938 - World Series
1939 - World Series
1941 - World Series
1943 - WWII
1944 - WWII
1945 - WWII
1947 - World Series
1949 - World Series
1950 - World Series
1951 - World Series
Then he went home to prime Marilyn Monroe.๐ฎโ๐จ
Lmao, you just proved the opposite.
You needed the original Greek explained to you (ฮผฮฟฮฝฮฎ or โabodes/dwelling placesโ) before you could grasp what John 14:2 actually says. Thatโs the entire point. English can approximate things after the fact, but it often carries centuries of baggage and popular misconceptions (โmansionsโ = beverly hills McMansions in the sky for Boomer eschatology).
The text was written in Greek, for Greek speakers in a Hellenistic context. The Fathers thought, prayed, and theologized in Greek, sometimes Latin. Pretending a modern English speaker with zero exposure to the original languages has the full picture is the real โmagic languageโ cope
No one said English speakers are illiterate retards. But acting like translation is lossless, or that you donโt lose nuance, cultural context, and philosophical precision without the originals is peak Protestant arrogance. Read the Fathers in Greek if you actually want to understand them.
@Guardians_Bane@waynejones36805 Thatโs good because even an LLM thinks your just rephrasing mainstream points that already donโt hold up. Did you use AI to write these?
1600s capitalism was tied to specific nations and peoples. Dutch, British, etc., built companies under crown charters, mercantilist policies protecting domestic industry. Innovation happened but only within a framework of ethnic/national cohesion, and often Christian ethics restraining pure greed. High trust societies with lower time preference.
Todayโs โcapitalismโ is hyper financialized, post national, usury x1000000. Shareholder value maximization is mandatory + ESG + central bank socialism for oligarchs. It produced iPhones and modern biotech, which seemed nice but came at the cost of propping up modern transhumanists like Thiel, Andreesson, Sachs, Epstein etc. and hallowed out communities, obviously demographic replacement from โlabor markets,โ elite cosmopolitanism, and cultural degeneracy as marketing. Add that with fiat money, debt slavery, and demographic decline, and it equals suicide.
@CadeofKent @Luke_Jahn_ Also yes thereโs a clear distinction between corporarism and capitalism, but they arenโt mutually exclusive. Think very early American Republic or Francoโs Spain. State run corporatism/capitalism
Youโre not special
The rebuttal is objectively flawed โ it smooths over data, overstates weak evidence, and evades the core problems. Rhetorically, the rebuttal dismisses objections as โmythsโ while relying on selective interpretations.
1. Timeline Mislead
Claiming 13โ25 Ma (or ~40 Ma with Ediacaran) makes it โnot too shortโ is wrong. This remains geologically explosive for the origin of most animal body plans with their integrated complexity. โHundreds of thousands of generationsโ hand-waves the real issue: generating massive new genetic/developmental information fast.
2. Ediacaran โPrecursorsโ Are Weak
Citing Dickinsonia and Kimberella as solving the โsudden appearanceโ is overstated. Most Ediacaran forms are enigmatic, lack clear links to Cambrian phyla, and largely disappear at the boundary. The hard-part fossilization excuse explains preservation bias but not the origin of the genetic machinery for those parts and associated complexity.
3. โFaster Ratesโ Describes, Doesnโt Solve
Saying evolution ran 4โ5x faster is accurate but circular. It highlights the anomaly (what needs explaining) without showing how random mutation + selection built new regulatory networks, organs, and body plans in that window. Rates normalized afterward.
4. Molecular Clocks Overhyped
Treating them as solid โproofโ of deep hidden history is unreliable. Clocks are model-dependent, suffer rate variation and calibration issues, and often conflict with fossils. They donโt resolve the mechanistic gaps.
Overall: The rebuttal downplays a genuine puzzle โ rapid morphological disparity and novelty โ while relying on selective interpretations and contested tools. It doesnโt rebut the challenges; it papers over them. The Cambrian pattern remains difficult for standard gradualist accounts.
@Brannners No, you just donโt like how much attention itโs getting because youโre happy a White kid got murdered while police sided with the attacker over a โracistโ accusation.
Your fake concern about โslopโ is just cope because the case exposes exactly what you support.
@soup4change@420groyp Well youโre a whore so the latter isnโt too far out there, youโre also retarded and shouldnโt be near any power so the former is pretty self explanatory
@RachelCoyleOhio Do you realize itโs a college account that gets no engagement on any post but has a large following from their alumni base? You sound retarded๐ literally all their posts have like 5 likes