@MrRelatable88 Like always… people underestimate Andrew. He never agrees to a debate unless he’s certain he can destroy the other side ....especially one this big....
@jpgechele De nada sirve un sistema electrico año 3415 , las mejores carreteras espaciales, el mejor hospital delux, etc sin ciudadanos con conciencia, moral & etica para cuidarlos y mantenerlos...
Muy liberal muy todo pero sin cultura ciudadana es un sin sentido..
Well I am going to make it super easy. You are correct I did claim there is overwhelming evidence Tyler killed Charlie Kirk. You claim there is OVERWHELMING EVIDENCE the feds set him up as a patsy.
So topic: Is it more likely based on evidence Tyler Robinson was set up by the feds as a patsy or that he wasn't?
All evening the Candace Owens people have been saying she makes no claims so she doesn’t have to defend any.
They claim I said there was overwhelming evidence for the prosecution of Robinson which is true I said that so I meed to defend it .
However, Candace did make a reverse claim. She said there is overwhelming evidence Robinson was set up by the feds as a patsy.
So I will take the position that the evidence is more compelling that Tyler was a lone shooter not set up by the feds. She takes the position of her claim, which she says has overwhelming evidence he was a patsy put there by the feds. If she agrees, then we are all set.
How the hell can anybody argue against me here? We both made claims. We both defend them.
@OrlvndoA Increible como la tendencia de todo politico , con el tiempo , es precisamente que pierda protagonismo por falta de resultados, incumplimiento de promesas, cambio de posiciones,etc..MCM Literalmente ha hecho todo eso y aun asi nos quieren vender que su popularidad va creciendo..
@merqurius100@Simonovis Se define y funciona públicamente como partido político..
Y ella perfectamente puede usar algun representante en esa mesa para tener voto sobre ese jurado o cualquier politica que quieran promover. ES NORMAL! Pasa en TODOS LOS PAISES.