In simple words,
It is only men who deserve respect.
Because even today, it is men who are expected to maintain a wife, children, and the entire family.
Despite all the noise around women empowerment and equality, society incl. courts are still orthodox enough to neither force nor expect a woman to earn for herself and her children— even when she has alienated the father from his own kids.
Rights, benefits, and sympathy are readily available.
Responsibilities, accountability, and financial obligations are still expected from men.
Debunking feminist propaganda in 30 seconds:
“WOMEN COULDN’T OWN CREDIT CARDS.”
Misleading. Before 1974, some lenders discriminated against married women, but women were not barred from having credit cards. Many single and financially independent women had them.
women were sometimes discriminated against because, under the law, they were not personally liable for certain debts. Their husbands were held responsible for them, which is why the husband’s approval was often required.”
“WOMEN COULDN’T OWN PROPERTY.”
False. Women owned property in America as early as the 1600s. Widows, single women, and female heirs could legally own, buy, and sell property.
“WOMEN COULDN’T VOTE.”
voting rights were tied to property ownership, not simply being male or female. This meant that in some jurisdictions, widows and unmarried women who owned property could vote, even when most women could not.
The most famous example is New Jersey, where unmarried women and widows who met property requirements could vote from 1776 until the law was changed in 1807.
“WOMEN DIDN’T HAVE A VOICE.”
False. By the late 1800s, women were prominent writers, speakers, reformers, and activists who helped shape public opinion and policy.
Thank me later 🙏
⚡🇨🇵 Marine Le Pen:
“Those connected to Islamist Ideology must be stripped of their Nationality and expelled.
Radical Mosques will be shut down…and the Muslim Brotherhood will be dissolved…” The West must wake up!
@brivael Here is the root cause for Wokeism, Woke-feminism, radical misandry, Critical race theory, LGBTQ, Gender reassignment surgery, retard pronouns.
Je veux présenter mes excuses, au nom des Français, pour avoir enfanté la French Theory (qui a enfanté la pire des merdes idéologiques : le wokisme).
Nous avons donné au monde Descartes, Pascal, Tocqueville. Et puis, dans les ruines intellectuelles de l'après-68, nous avons donné Foucault, Derrida, Deleuze. Trois hommes brillants qui ont fabriqué, dans l'élégance de notre langue, l'arme idéologique qui paralyse aujourd'hui l'Occident.
Il faut comprendre ce qu'ils ont fait. Foucault a enseigné que la vérité n'existe pas, qu'il n'y a que des rapports de pouvoir déguisés en savoir. Que la science, la raison, la justice, l'institution médicale, l'école, la prison, la sexualité, tout n'est qu'une mise en scène de la domination. Derrida a enseigné que les textes n'ont pas de sens stable, que tout signifiant glisse, que toute lecture est une trahison, que l'auteur est mort et que le lecteur règne. Deleuze a enseigné qu'il fallait préférer le rhizome à l'arbre, le nomade au sédentaire, le désir à la loi, le devenir à l'être, la différence à l'identité.
Pris isolément, ce sont des thèses discutables. Combinées, exportées, vulgarisées, elles forment un système. Et ce système est un poison.
Car voici ce qui s'est passé. Ces textes, illisibles en France, ont traversé l'Atlantique. Les départements de Yale, de Berkeley, de Columbia les ont absorbés dans les années 80. Ils y ont trouvé un terreau qui n'existait pas chez nous : le puritanisme américain, sa culpabilité raciale, son obsession identitaire. La French Theory s'est mariée à ce substrat, et l'enfant de ce mariage s'appelle le wokisme.
Judith Butler lit Foucault et invente le genre performatif. Edward Said lit Foucault et invente le post-colonialisme académique. Kimberlé Crenshaw hérite du cadre et invente l'intersectionnalité. À chaque étape, la matrice est française : il n'y a pas de vérité, il n'y a que du pouvoir, donc toute hiérarchie est suspecte, toute institution est oppressive, toute norme est violence, toute identité est construite donc négociable, toute majorité est coupable.
Voilà comment trois philosophes parisiens, qui n'ont probablement jamais imaginé leurs conséquences pratiques, ont fourni le logiciel d'exploitation à une génération entière d'activistes, de bureaucrates universitaires, de DRH, de journalistes, de législateurs. Voilà comment on a obtenu une civilisation qui ne sait plus dire si une femme est une femme, si sa propre histoire mérite d'être défendue, si le mérite existe, si la vérité se distingue de l'opinion.
C'est de la merde pour une raison simple, et il faut la dire calmement. Une civilisation se tient debout sur trois piliers : la croyance qu'il existe une vérité accessible à la raison, la croyance qu'il existe un bien distinct du mal, la croyance qu'il existe un héritage à transmettre. La French Theory a entrepris de dynamiter les trois. Pas par méchanceté. Par jeu intellectuel, par fascination du soupçon, par haine de la bourgeoisie qui les avait nourris. Mais le résultat est là. Une génération entière a appris à déconstruire et n'a jamais appris à construire. Une génération entière sait soupçonner et ne sait plus admirer. Une génération entière voit le pouvoir partout et la beauté nulle part.
Je m'excuse parce que nous, Français, avons une responsabilité particulière. C'est notre langue, nos universités, nos éditeurs, notre prestige qui ont donné à ce nihilisme son emballage chic. Sans la légitimité de la Sorbonne et de Vincennes, ces idées n'auraient jamais traversé l'océan. Nous avons exporté le doute comme d'autres exportent des armes.
Ce qui se construit maintenant, en silicon valley, dans les labos d'IA, dans les startups, dans les ateliers, dans tous les lieux où des gens fabriquent encore des choses au lieu de les déconstruire, c'est la réponse. Une civilisation se reconstruit par les bâtisseurs, pas par les commentateurs. Par ceux qui croient que la vérité existe et qu'elle vaut qu'on s'y consacre. Par ceux qui assument une hiérarchie du beau, du vrai, du bon, et qui n'ont pas honte de la transmettre.
Alors pardon. Et au travail.
Japanese politician Chikako Fujiwara is protesting against the policy of settling foreigners in Japan.
She warns that immigrants from Muslim countries — especially from Pakistan and Bangladesh — are a serious cause for concern. Their culture simply does not match Japan’s peaceful, disciplined, and orderly way of life.
🚨 JUST IN: Islamists and leftists are FURIOUS after Tommy Robinson gave the perfect answer
Q: What would happen if you become a prime minister tomorrow?
ROBINSON: "I would STOP Islam, I'd END foreign funding in this country. All the migrants would be taken out the hotels and sent back tomorrow by the military!"
Holy based!
"I would have re-migration. It's time for many Muslims to leave this country. You've got your homes to go to. This is our home. We've got nowhere to go to!"
"We're not allowing it to change any longer. You've seen today, people have fed up then. People are FED UP!" 🔥
This is the way, western man!
h/t Veronika Rogoyska @TRobinsonNewEra
Robert Breedlove explains how $6 trillion of printed dollars in 2020 is equivalent to 100 million years of stolen labor or 2 million human lives of productive labor.
"Central banking is an institutionalized system of time theft."
Bitcoin pulls back the veil.
Reminder: taxes are due in one month and five days.
Crunch the numbers, cross your t’s and dot those i’s.
Uncle Sam needs your money to fund forever wars, enable overt Medicaid fraud and bailout the impending private equity collapse.
Well, they don’t actually need your money because they can issue debt and have the Fed print it out of thin air.
The taxes are for the humiliation part of the equation.
Everyone shares the Cantillon Effect, but...
Nobody shares the Cantillon Playbook.
The Cantillon Effect is simple:
When new money enters an economy, whoever gets it first benefits most, and by the time it reaches everyone else, prices have already risen.
It sounds bad, it sounds unfair, but it's what it is... and more importantly...
If you understand the "Mechanism" for how this works, it can change everything.
So the majority of new money isn't created by the Fed. It's created by commercial banks through lending.
Just compare the total assets of commercial banks to the total assets of the Fed. It's not even close.
And this changes everything, because...
The "Level 1" on the Cantillon chain isn't some shadowy central bank. It's Chase or Bank of America.
The bank you already have an account with.
Here's the actual sequence:
→ Commercial banks create new money by issuing credit
→ Those with collateral borrow first and acquire assets at today's prices
→ Asset prices rise as credit expands
→ Consumer prices follow
→ Wages adjust last, after purchasing power has already declined
The Fed's own data shows the result:
- The top 10% hold nearly 90% of equities
- The bottom 50% hold roughly 1%
But... what almost everyone misses is:
"Everyone has access to bank credit, and almost everyone uses it."
The difference is what they use it for.
Most people use credit to finance depreciating assets like cars, furniture, and credit card balances on things that lose value the moment you swipe.
But the top of the Cantillon chain uses credit to acquire appreciating assets — and borrows against those assets to acquire more. The collateral compounds. The debt gets repaid in cheaper dollars.
It's the same banks and the same credit system.
But with completely different outcomes.
The Cantillon Effect isn't something that happens to you from above. You're already inside the system.
The only question is which side of the bank's lending you're on.
Understanding this won't change the system. But it might change how you use it.
------
h/t @jameslavish for his Cantillon post, just wanted to add how to use it to your advantage
Jack Mallers says, "It's really impossible to value things if there's an infinite amount of dollars."
And we agree.
If your money isn’t fixed, how do you value anything in your life?