Can the government compel tech companies like @Google and @Meta to turn over information about everyone at a particular location at a particular time, using Geofence Warrants?
That’s the issue the Supreme Court is being asked to resolve in Chatrie v. United States.
With the birthright citizenship case looming, I joined @NEWSMAX to explain why the “and subject to the jurisdiction thereof” language of the 14th Amendment will play a central role in the Supreme Court’s decision.
The Supreme Court released 4 opinions today.
These involved guns, immigration, and…pesticide regulation (federal preemption).
Listen as I break them down. 👇
Of course the Eighth Amendment doesn't prohibit the death penalty for this heinous conduct!
For an even more in-depth explanation, see my recently published article in the @CumberlandLaw Review.
https://t.co/2zEgYaZd3v
Does the Eighth Amendment prohibit death penalty for child rapists? Of course not. Does binding Supreme Court precedent prevent it? No. "That perception is wrong." Brilliant Judge Divine (Trump II) writes an opinion blowing that misperception door off its hinges. Let's dive in!
@smmarotta Without getting into the merits of your claim, here's my actual @CumberlandLaw Review article explaining why the Eighth Amendment clearly does not prohibit the death penalty for this heinous conduct.
https://t.co/2zEgYaZd3v
What are some of the BIG Supreme Court cases that still have to be decided?
Birthright citizenship, Presidential hiring and firing, transgender sports, and more!
I joined @Alex_Kraemer3 on @Newsmax to discuss.
The Evanston Reparations Committee is seeking to implement a racist program to pay up to $25,000 to black residents as “reparations.” The Supreme Court has already made it clear that general race-based programs like these are racially discriminatory and therefore illegal.
@tzsmith
Senior Legal Fellow at @Heritage, @tzsmith, tells @GeoffHarrisTV that their entire goal of releasing the Biden audio tapes is for the sake of transparency to the American public.
"The judge said, the Justice Department has engaged in extensive review of audio files, they've engaged in extensive redaction of these audio files… the interest in public disclosure… outweighs any potential privacy concerns…"
READ THE STORY: https://t.co/FutiJzK5YZ
⬇️A federal judge rules the DOJ can release audio recordings & transcripts of former President Joe Biden to the @Heritage Foundation.
Senior Legal Fellow @tzsmith tells @GeoffHarrisTV the lawsuit is "a win for government transparency."
READ GEOFF'S REPORT: https://t.co/FutiJzK5YZ
Fake news from @SenSchumer@chuckschumer about the SAVE America Act?! Who could imagine!
I joined @Newsmax to talk about this and how FISA 702 reauthorization fits into the conversation.
Cameras at the Supreme Court?!
The @SenJudiciaryGOP@JudiciaryDems passed a bipartisan proposal to require the Supreme Court to televise most of its proceedings.
Should the Supreme Court allow cameras in the courtroom?