So Massie wanted black citizens to get guns in a legal way easier and of course the right opposed that. Wow. That's all the more reason why minorities should arm themselves. The pro genocide class doesn't want you to get guns. I wonder why.
@BTarrants66365@StickyFingaz47@ElectricSheep_Z@fudreaper_ Self defense isnt in the Constitution either
Also go look up United States vs. Cruikshank. Your own white people helped set the precedent that the federal gov't leaves it up to the states when it comes to individuals infringing on others' Constitutional rights
@HarrisonHSmith White people don't deserve to die for using the n-word, but they can't claim they reasonably feared for their life when someone punches them over it. Even when said punch is technically illegal. Two things can be true
I watched niggas praise the Clipse album where two 50 year old millionaires rap about selling coke. & then turn around and say that Drakeโs music needs to mature.
I love both albums but niggas donโt even hide their biases lol
What are you talking about? Stop exaggerating. Your heroes George Zimmerman and Daniel Penny got off scot free. Ethan Couch got probation for killing a family of 4 while drunk driving.
Ok, but for real now, what am I, a White man, supposed to do if I or my family is attacked by a black? The system says I have to let him kill me, b/c if I defend myself it will put me in prison full of blacks looking to kill me.
And what do we do about this system?
@MidAgeMadMan@winsoverlosses1@TaraBull Yes technically the guy that punched him shouldn't have done that but you also cant claim self defense when you shoot back. By being the provocateur and aggressor, even if just verbal, that means you had no reasonable fear of losing your life. You were asking for retaliation.
@SethBrundl98457@planefag Except that in the Tennessee Supreme Court they already ruled that, in State v. Duncan (2010), the aggressor doctrine applies even when the act of aggression is verbal, since there is a clear intent of provocation