Just spoke on stage about how we actually solve the housing crisis: less red tape, less government interference, and a market that works for Canadians, not global investors. The People’s Party gets it. The others? They just make it worse.
Serious question to every Canada Liberal supporter
After 10+ years of record inflation, a crushing housing crisis, exploding national debt, energy policies destroying the West, and mass immigration overwhelming our cities how do you still back the Liberals and see Mark Carney as the man who will fix it?
I’m asking genuinely. What concrete achievements justify continuing down this path?
Meanwhile you just blocked me on Instagram right after my criticism on your reel. Blocking people for basic pushback is pretty thin skinned.
You using foreigners in your “Canada First” protests while claiming to put Canada first completely kills your credibility.
This is my last message and I hope you shift to real economic solutions instead of just clout chasing protests. Best of luck.
DRIPA chaos. Treaty disputes. Roadblock threats.
The NDP keeps failing First Nations communities across our province.
Now, the Lax Kw'alaams Chief is warning that he can't hold back his people from blocking the Port of Prince Rupert and LNG pipelines: the direct result of a treaty process that steamrolled overlapping territorial claims, and ignored indigenous voices.
These aren't just policy files.
They're people's lands, rights, and futures.
The NDP needs to do better.
#bcpoli
Carney has a majority now so there’s no more excuses.
We’re still bringing in hundreds of thousands of people while Canada housing supply can’t keep up.
At what point do we admit this isn’t working?
Or are Carney supporters still going to bury their heads in the sand.
“We had meaningful discussions on (…) the challenges faced by Punjabi students and workers in Canada due to stricter immigration policies.”
I am almost certain that the discussions focused solely on not deporting them and granting them permanent residency.
Another proof that your loyalty is not to Canadians.
International students and temporary workers who overstay their visas are illegals and must be deported!
Are they “racist” because you don’t agree with them and refuse to have civilized discussion? You realize these terms calling people “racist” and “fascist” show you’ve lost the plot and base you argument on emotions and not actual debate…… the left is losing the war in Canada and don’t be surprised when the youth growing up now lean more right.
She went there for a civilized discussion. Even if you disagree with her then be an adult and debate her. This is why liberal leftists lose the plot when you choose feelings over discussion…… the professors, liberal news outlets, and older generations who turned words like “racism” and “fascist” to pure slogans are to blame for this.
The tide is turning with the younger generation and don’t be surprised when it happens. All the left had to do was be civilized and show respect even if you disagree. That’s literally not a hard ask.
“Canada doesn’t do what Canada does for Canada. Canada does what Canada does because Canada is Canadian!”
- Mark Carney
Followed by all the liberal seals clapping with thunderous applause 👏
I debated Avi Lewis on stage, and now watching him campaign for NDP leadership is pure performance politics. Overnight its pipelines, green energy, Indigenous rights, coastlines, the full moral checklist.
But not a word about Canada’s deteriorating relationship with the United States, the single most important trade pillar of our economy.
You don’t get to posture about ‘nation-building’ while ignoring the fact that weakening U.S. trade costs real jobs, real investment, and real leverage. Pipelines to Asia might bring in money, but they don’t replace what’s lost when you alienate your closest ally.
This is exactly what the NDP does best: big symbols, loud virtue, and silence on the hard economic math.
Mark Carney has betrayed all of us by making a pipeline pact with Danielle Smith. A real nation-building project would expand the renewable energy of the future while creating thousands of jobs - powerlines not pipelines.
We will stand up for Indigenous rights, for our coast, for our country. We will fight to protect the places we love like our lives depend on it, because they absolutely do.
So modern homeowners should pay for something that happened 100 years ago and all the sudden this reasoning gives you a moral pass to guilt-trip white people…. My friend you’re not “educated” you’re actually delusional. History is history whether it’s good or bad. The world moves on. Maybe you should too.
Canada isn’t a “stolen car.” Every home bought today was purchased legally, with taxes paid and ownership registered under Canadian law. No one alive today “stole” anything. If you think modern homeowners should answer for something from centuries ago, then you’re not living in the real world.
@gordbouch@fnub_@DemosKratosCA But that somehow makes it not relevant? People who bought their homes/land in Canada today in modern day 21st Century western culture have a 100% valid legal title as owners on their homes and that is their right.
That’s the fairy-tale version of DEI sounds nice, but reality doesn’t match the brochure.
If it was truly about equal opportunity, we wouldn’t need diversity officers, racial hiring quotas, or gender targets written into HR policy. Merit would speak for itself.
Instead, DEI elevates identity over excellence and turns hiring into social engineering. It’s not about “helping everyone compete” it’s about tilting the field until outcomes look politically convenient.
That’s how we ended up with declining standards across institutions while pretending it’s “progress.” When you replace competence with ideology, failure is inevitable.
You’re confusing accessibility with ideology.
Accessibility, like wheelchair ramps or cut-outs is a practical accommodation rooted in compassion and functionality. Most everyone supports that.
But DEI is not about access; it’s about re-engineering institutions around identity politics. It replaces competence with quotas, divides people by race and gender, and turns “inclusion” into a loyalty test for progressive ideology.
The language sounds harmless because it’s designed that way. But beneath the slogans, DEI programs pressure companies and governments to hire or promote based on identity first and skill second. That’s not equality, it’s discrimination in reverse, and it weakens every institution it touches.
Canada’s decline in standards from the military, to education and public service didn’t come from a lack of empathy. It came from replacing merit with messaging. That’s why by DEI needs to go. If you’re over 55 years old then you know deep down that DEI is discriminatory but you resist to say so because it goes against the left liberalist agenda. Liberals from the 1960-90s are not the same liberals as they are today…..