@SymbolOfKrypton@CaseyBookAuthor@Riyuenthusiast I was using your own logic, genius. But I’m glad that you are at least bright enough to recognise that it’s bad.
Now you just to learn how to apply it consistently. Good luck!
@SymbolOfKrypton@CaseyBookAuthor So Superman responds only to world-level threats? How very nice of him. Really heroic.
That was sarcasm, by the way, since you probably missed it.
@ryoto_dawn1@YinkaKeepItReal I’d say it’s a pretty big deal.
Superman is the son of two worlds. He was sent to Earth out of love and hope from his biological parents.
To turn him into a weapon from space colonisers instead so that he could reject Krypton as his birthplace? Yeah, that’s pretty bad.
@comics_jeff Honestly, I don’t even blame Venom for that. He’s a symptom but not the cause.
If Venom didn’t exist, the editorial would just use Inheritors or someone else.
@SymbolOfKrypton@CaseyBookAuthor So, your preferred version of Superman is the guy who stands on the sidelines because “someone else will take care of it”?
Sure. If that works for you, I guess.
I prefer Superman who fights to save the world and its people no matter how many other heroes are out there.
when asked about what they think superman's character is, a person said "He’s a stand up, happy-go lucky hero"
1000% honesty:
happy go lucky doesn't even COME TO MIND as a way to describe Superman
i don't even think it fits, like, a single version of him
The most anti-immigrant Superman movie you will ever watch.
Seriously though, it’s a fun enough flick.
But good God, the amount of people that were convinced by it to embrace Byrne’s take on Superman is frustrating.
@SymbolOfKrypton@CaseyBookAuthor@Riyuenthusiast By your logic, David’s Superman bears responsibility for the damage caused by that imp that he decided to do nothing about.
Because he would rather sit that fight out and let Justice Gang, the team he knows to be reckless with collateral damage, to handle it instead.