#Roblox@Roblox@robloxdevrel
You need to look at this right now and fix your fucking platform and make press releases reversing your decisions immediately.
https://t.co/X7cibSFHOv
- A banned vigilante 🖕
So let me get this straight, leftists are protesting in echo chambers, yelling at empty buildings in cities that share the same political beliefs and that are actually ruled by democrat kings?
You can't make this stuff up.
No precedent has been set in stone... Yet. SCOTUS did what they do best & punted back to the lower courts. I asked Grok:
Conclusion
Yes, this is essentially SCOTUS punting the issue back to the lower courts for further development, and the case can absolutely be appealed and return to SCOTUS.
The Supreme Court’s 5-4 decision to let the TRO stand is a temporary, procedural ruling, NOT A FINAL JUDGMENT ON THE MERITS, The parties involved can continue to litigate through the federal court system, with the possibility of the case climbing back up to SCOTUS for a definitive resolution, especially given the high stakes (a $2 billion payment) and the sharp division among the justices.
This process reflects the normal operation of the U.S. judicial system, with multiple layers of review to ensure careful consideration of complex legal and constitutional questions.
Full thread, if you're interested.
https://t.co/BGpKIjMp3m
The Supreme Court's decision to block President Trump's freeze on $1.9B in USAID funding is a blatant example of judicial overreach. By a narrow 5-4 vote, Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Barrett sided with the liberal wing, undermining Trump's America First agenda. Alito's dissent rightly called out this "judicial hubris," highlighting the absurdity of a single judge dictating $2B in taxpayer funds.
This clash reveals D.C.'s broken system, where bureaucrats and courts protect foreign aid slush funds while Trump fights to prioritize American interests. The battle isn't over—real accountability means dismantling the foreign aid-industrial complex entirely.