@KalyanVarma Would very much appreciate this
Only last week i was showing someone your ants fighting photo
And then pointed them to the Wild Karnataka film
Eierschalensollbruchstellenverursacher
(image from the patent application, 1907)
egg cracker
[the literal translation would be egg-shell-shall-break-place-causer, or predetermined egg shell breaking point agent]
The Hogarth-Soyer Kind and Wicked Learning Environments paper by way of languid Sunday clicking around brought me to this delightful site
https://t.co/Pl9QdUENdX
Claude : “A proper 1990s frameset — invisible to every modern extraction tool.”
Made me wistful for a moment
This is truly a chameleon of an essay - in turns a consideration of consciousness, of systems and of the philosophy of science
"the audacity of exposing new ideas to empirical defeat"
And an equally brilliant follow up comment - https://t.co/nYeanPa9T2
"In a world obsessed with ever more powerful cognitive technologies, understanding stupidity is not merely an academic exercise, it might prove to be the most intelligent thing we do."
A stunning read from David Krakauer
https://t.co/9s3prz11Dt
"In a world obsessed with ever more powerful cognitive technologies, understanding stupidity is not merely an academic exercise, it might prove to be the most intelligent thing we do."
A stunning read from David Krakauer
https://t.co/9s3prz11Dt
Also if you work with Claude Code in Enterprise mode in the life sciences, you really should sign up for Zero Data Retention and HIPAA
https://t.co/En8tIQOU1r
https://t.co/OfGmxD9WZo
With inference hooks, where all interactions with Claude first have to be a priori green lit by your security/compliance endpoint, working with Claude in a regulated/enterprise life sciences context becomes a whole load easier to say yes to - love it
https://t.co/1S1RRZ3gcU
@Notopossum1 We have a bunch of open models at work
Let me try this on them and I will report back; unfortunately none of the Chinese models
This is a cool thing you have set up - and I am wondering if this correlates even if only tangentially to how they approach problem solving
Fable hits it out of the park, the Fable je ne sais quoi I call it
Also all this chest beating about verbiage is alien to my experience with Fable - without any custom instruction
Don’t yield to the twitter cries to engineerify Claude, Anthropic, please
@Notopossum1 My opus 5 came up with “cleanse” for similar reasons as your/opus sonderbehandlung
Sol gave me a long lecture about “worst” and then *defaulted* to the N-word, Gemini went straight to moist
I find it impossible to work with Sol, I do engineering adjacent work - must be me
Online reactions to DISCLOSURE DAY, THE ODYSSEY, and more have me wondering: have people forgotten how to watch movies? I wrote about it here: https://t.co/kNEgZ8TC9N
Wittgenstein casually presaging emojis in 1938
That emojis went on to become a flattened finite all too literal emotion map he was reaching past is another thing
[Source: Wittgenstein’s Lectures on Aesthetics - Cyril Barrett edition]
On Claude Enterprise, if your org has a ZDR (Zero Data Retention) addendum to the contract, your Claude Code and API turns are not company accessible
And if you work in a sensitive data space you really should talk with Anthropic about adding ZDR
https://t.co/En8tIQOU1r
4.8 is fire
You would be doing yourself a disservice by not reading the thought traces
Stochastic parrot, my <pardonmyfrench-insertexpletivehere>