@Rcheng727 No. He was not, he settled in one and the ATP said there was not enough evidence. How many times will you move the goalpost though? You ask for evidence I show you were there was evidence and you say not good enough
@Rcheng727 There was enough evidence that it went to court and more evidence that the ATP ran a 15 month long investigation. Those don’t happen with “zero evidence”
@Rcheng727 I’m on a phone not behind my computer, still doesn’t change the fact that he didn’t beat a top 10 player thus making it far less impressive than most other slam winners