The Account formerly known as

#AntiFederalist #USA #OPC #R2K #AntiEnlightenment #ReformedScholastic #CitizenScientist #CitizenPhilosopher #MicroHomestead #StrictSubscriptionist #LionDiet

[The Account formerly known as @YAProlegomena]

John Michael Talbot & Michard Card 8-8-2013 "One Faith" https://t.co/A8HP2KKMHw via @YouTube

/fin

^

/init

[Heidelblog @Heidelblog01]

ICYMI: Trueman: An Unwritten Creed Is Still A Creed | The Heidelblog

@RScottClark @heidelcast @heidelbergrefo1

https://t.co/yYSTf9AWtC

[The Account formerly known as @YAProlegomena]

@FiredUpCoug You probably should check and know history before making conclusion based on it.

[Andrew Daub @TheResoluteLife]

In case you’re wondering who Team Iron Will is, why we exist, and what we do, here’s an intro!

Oh, and the impact highlights in the video? Those are from a few months ago and we’ve already left them in the dust!

@TeamIronWillHQ

https://t.co/xUyBtC6ytM https://t.co/p0DnhpfL6j

[The Account formerly known as @YAProlegomena]

@CrankyHankJ @SurelyNotHank Can we also do the 14th?
That would restore the 10th.

[The Account formerly known as @YAProlegomena]

@jonharris1989 @megbasham This is why denominations have published standards and practice fencing…

One day the SBC might be a denomination, today they remain a voluntary association for the training of ministers and the promotion of missions.

[John A. Douglas @J0hnADouglas]

🚨COVER REVEAL🚨

In an era of deconstructed heroes and gray morals, we’ve never needed an altruistic, unapologetic hero more than now.

So, that’s what I wrote.

The Lionheart: Icon of Justice is a second starter book in the Age of Adventures.

Zelda in the comment below

[The Account formerly known as @YAProlegomena]

@GHHILL1911 I went with the paid service. I do bill it annually, but they provide a service so I am ok with paying for that.

[The Account formerly known as @YAProlegomena]

@CWadeBaker @PuritanChaplain Dude, they are Baptist.

The BFAM2026 requires 20 different “salads” (none of which have lettuce) and 10 casseroles…

Lets not even get into the great fried chicken resurgence of 2010

[The Account formerly known as @YAProlegomena]

@CAHutch1990 Wait, I am a fake man because I do not use my formal name?

The rest of your arguments are fine.

There is a difference between a pseudonym and anonymity though

In my case, this account was a side account, but my original account was locked for discussing 1990s salsa…
Pace

[The Account formerly known as @YAProlegomena]

@Jake_7777_ @sola_chad Cessationism is correct,

Not legalist in toto, but certainly legalism lite in the form of Lordship Salvation

Uncaring? No clue, never met him.

So in error? Certainly.

Not any more so than your belief that adversity proves your correctness

[The Account formerly known as @YAProlegomena]

@sola_chad To be fair, Johnny Mac also claimed every consistent calvinist is dispensational.

The difference is he was correct about the Mormon issue.

[The Account formerly known as @YAProlegomena]

@OrthodoxPC How very We of You/Us

The reply is thoughtful, truthful, & tight

I do suspect that the tagging of the OPC account is not solely for communication purposes, b/ also is used to drive algorithmic visibility

In other words: the OPC account reputation increases w/ interaction

[The Account formerly known as @YAProlegomena]

@HansFiene @DZRishmawy But I will point out that you are not disputing with an individual.

The LDS are running off of talking points that the posters are not deriving themselves.

The correct reply is to maintain that which you have already done:

Espouse the non-novel ecumenical creeds

[The Account formerly known as @YAProlegomena]

@HansFiene @DZRishmawy I am not going to say “give up”, for we are called to contend for the faith once delivered to the saints.

That requires our response to a series of challenges that were already answered centuries ago by those who are more talented than we and whose answer has stood the tests /1

[The Account formerly known as @YAProlegomena]

@Manhattva @BMcGrewvy I already gave that to you, what you have failed to do is do the same.

See above about 4 posts including Galatians

Your claim is the extraordinary one and violates the principle of sufficient reason.

Extraordinary/novel claims must bear the burden of reason

[The Account formerly known as @YAProlegomena]

@Manhattva @BMcGrewvy God demands we gatekeep things, maybe you should read:

Matthew 18:15-17, Galatians 6:1, 1 Corinthians 5:11–13 as a starting place.

Your objections would be far more pertinent if all the issues were not solved 1500 years before the deception authored by Smith

[The Account formerly known as @YAProlegomena]

@Manhattva @BMcGrewvy Many will not

Some who claim to will hear:
23 And then will I declare to them, ‘I never knew you; depart from me, you workers of lawlessness.’

[The Account formerly known as @YAProlegomena]

@Manhattva @BMcGrewvy Thats the difference between a literal read & literalistic read

Like the difference between a child-like faith & a childish faith

Context + genre are important

No man seeks after the Father, no not one
See John 6:44 & Rom 3:11

But there are those called

Note: Matthew 7:21

[The Account formerly known as @YAProlegomena]

@JulieCFrost How many times have I told you: Pineapple is not a valid pizza topping*

*’Its a joke people… just get the runs with it -bwahahaha

[The Account formerly known as @YAProlegomena]

@Manhattva @BMcGrewvy God demands we gatekeep things, maybe you should read:

Matthew 18:15-17, Galatians 6:1, 1 Corinthians 5:11–13 as a starting place.

Your objections would be far more pertinent if all the issues were not solved 1500 years before the deception authored by Smith