Zaelesis

Part-time Twitch Affiliate.

[Zaelesis @Zaelesis]

@Vara_Dark if the game hasnt broken even after 2.7 million sales, but it didnt cost 200 million to make, what is the split to retailers?
Thats an insane number to hit and still be in the hole.

[Zaelesis @Zaelesis]

On election day at the poll, i you do not present photo id, you can verify id with 2 pieces of legal mail (such as bills) and your voter card. All 3 must match in all aspects of name and address AND even if they do, the poll worker has the right to turn you away with a card to request a vote extension. Ive been voting since i was 19 in this country and have seen it happen several times.
Getting a mail in ballot is not easy in Canada.

[Zaelesis @Zaelesis]

@ColonelKurt24 @tradesoftoday @aimeeterese Not one case actually made it to a court, they were all thrown out on standing. It wasnt until 2025 that georgia found 315000 votes that were uncertified, which if caught at the time, wouldve made a massive difference in the election.
https://t.co/kRCjXCoCu8

[Zaelesis @Zaelesis]

In canada, you still have to provide proof of citizenship in order to get a mail-in ballot and its under very strict control on who can and cant get one.
I live here and have friends who vote by mail and they had to jump through hoops, one is so allergic to life that she will die if she had to go to the polls due to scented things in the area. Its not as simple as requesting one and getting it.

[Zaelesis @Zaelesis]

Card says this turn, stun section (under your interpretation) causes a special clean up, end phase rules say special cleanup that is triggered happens after aurora.
Id say that's pretty contradicting.
The idea is to make the game play as it reads on the card for ease of new players. The fact that this is even a question is cause for errata and rule 002

[Zaelesis @Zaelesis]

@ibillien_ikarus @Doowan_ The rule book contradicts itself as well as the card. Rule 002 states the card is true and the stun effect would end. There needs to be an errata on the rule book.
Stun is now a keyword as well where originally it was just an effect.

[Zaelesis @Zaelesis]

@Maav_BR @HatsuneMael @Doowan_ Ya, i was going off of the link from the judges page. Sadly the site still has all the old links active.

[Zaelesis @Zaelesis]

@Mythical7Panda @Are_Echo @metro85 @Doowan_ @BasedPyramus and people have been and will continue to play it as this turn because thats what the card says. Until there is an errata, its up to the judges interpretation.

[Zaelesis @Zaelesis]

@Doowan_ @Nakfen Until there is an errata to the rule book or the card, both are technically true based on the judge making the ruling.

[Zaelesis @Zaelesis]

@Doowan_ @Nakfen Rule 423 doesnt apply to stun anymore, the rule was moved to 410. Its an out dated rule to apply before stun was a keyword. Rule 002 says the card is correct when it directly contradicts the book. Even the book contradicts itself.

[Zaelesis @Zaelesis]

@Mythical7Panda @Are_Echo @metro85 @Doowan_ @BasedPyramus The former 423, which is now 410, contradicts stun being a keyword and needs to have an errata or be removed entirely as its no longer needed.

[Zaelesis @Zaelesis]

@Mythical7Panda @Are_Echo @metro85 @Doowan_ @BasedPyramus The stun keyword directly contradicts the old rules where stun was not a keyword. Rule 002 says the card is correct. It is a this turn effect.

[Zaelesis @Zaelesis]

@Maav_BR @HatsuneMael @Doowan_ that rule listing does not exist in the current rule sheet.

[Zaelesis @Zaelesis]

@Doowan_ @JhonDow125 @Mythical7Panda Stun is a "this turn" effect as it states in effect itself "deals no combat damage this turn"

[Zaelesis @Zaelesis]

@sourpatchlyds i question the safety of ozempic but you are right, losing the weight is the important part.

[The Fat Electrician @Fat_Electrician]

Unpopular opinion: this is correct.

Fighting & fucking.

Almost every major technological advancement in human history can be traced back to one of two motivations:

A. Kill the enemy
B. Put the wife in a good mood

Humanity didn’t invent faster ships, stronger metals, or the internet because we’re enlightened scholars.

We did it because some dude either wanted to win a war, or get laid.

[Zaelesis @Zaelesis]

If someone wouldnt do something a tiny as a bow for the perfect person, they would likely not do anything for someone imperfect.
The point is people do things for their partner because the partner does things for them as well. Its not 1 way and the idea they wouldnt do anything for their partner at all is telling of who they really are.

[Zaelesis @Zaelesis]

@clairwk @Fat_Electrician @Id10tzQuery Thats the best part, there is no convincing. The question does not allow for communication between people voting.
How much faith do people have in large portions of the world that live in poverty to think of the abstract?