Laki ױ

In crypto since 2017 | Top-Holdings Ⓥ ױ ⭕️

[🇨🇭 Nati @nati_sfv_asf]

HISTORISCH: Wir stehen erstmals seit 72 Jahren im WM-Viertelfinale!!!
UN MOMENT HISTORIQUE : pour la première fois depuis 72 ans, nous sommes en quarts de finale de la Coupe du monde!!!
UN MOMENTO STORICO: Per la prima volta dopo 72 anni siamo ai quarti del Mondiale!!!

[Taner @fmdestekcom]

Balogun olayından sonra Belçika - Amerika maçı

[David Vivancos - e/acc @VivancosDavid]

Happy to share that our bio-inspired #Neuraxon 2.0 by @VivancosDavid & @josesanchezhb with @_Qubic_ #OpenScience #aigarth @c_@c___f___b is showing promissing results in the most challenging #AI #AGI #benchmark #ARCAGI 3 by @fchollet @mikeknoop and team @arcprize

First Entry we get 0.13%

Most Frontier AI's rank 0% or close to it, even @grok 4.2 beta by @elonmusk @xai ranked 0.1% lower than our first entry.

Btw:

1.- We use no LLMs or VLMs or alike, just Neuraxon Architecture so no call's to expensive APIs

2.- and 0% GPUs in this case raw plain CPUs

Long road ahead to rise the rankings but stay tuned for the updates & follow the progress here:

https://t.co/VzFFabYYFK

Neuraxon is #OpenSource in GitHub https://t.co/SJuYIL0BOA

Demos & Datasets at @huggingface @ClementDelangue and team https://t.co/h5Cl3hu5uS

[MrUnknown @The_Squale_]

It seems many people still don’t fully understand Qubic’s current token dilution mechanics. 🚨

Every epoch, 1 trillion new $QUBIC tokens are emitted! If the combination of tokens burned plus net tokens bought (buys minus sells) fails to offset this new supply, the circulating supply increases and the price drops. This happens regardless of bull market conditions, positive news, or favorable sentiment. And this is were we stand now.

The game-changer? When net supply added turns negative, the token comes under strong buying pressure, and the price rises. 🚀

This isn’t black magic. You can drive a token’s price higher simply by burning coins consistently, even if nobody is actively buying or selling. The real issue is liquidity: if the price only rises due to burns in low-volume conditions, sellers will likely have to exit at much lower prices.

What makes Qubic interesting is its constant, progressive, and healthy token burn mechanism stronger and more sustainable than that of many other projects. This should gradually push the price higher over the coming years, supported by a community that continues to accumulate.

See the numbers in the table below and check when net emissions are projected to turn negative (when burns permanently outpace new supply). It is for soon.

The best part? Those who would have sold early during the upcoming burns and potentially broken the momentum are long gone, too busy screaming “scam.”

[2xnmore @2xnmore]

Most people who hate $QUBIC have never actually read what it is.

They saw “IOTA” and stopped reading.

Here is what is actually happening with this project before you form an opinion:

$QUBIC started as a concept inside the IOTA ecosystem back in 2018. The original vision was called Quorum Based Computations. The idea was to build smart contracts, oracles, and decentralised computing on top of IOTA’s feeless ledger. It was years ahead of the market in ambition.

IOTA never fully built it, so the founder built it himself.

Sergey Ivancheglo (Come From Beyond) is the man behind $QUBIC today. He co-created IOTA and created NXT before that, one of the first Proof of Stake blockchains in crypto history. He left IOTA in 2019 after public disagreements with the foundation and took the Qubic vision independent.

That history is real. The drama was real. It is also irrelevant to what $QUBIC does technically today.

Here is the honest picture of what the project actually is:

- $QUBIC runs on Useful Proof of Work. Miners do not waste energy on meaningless calculations. The computation trains AI models instead. Every hash has a function. That is a genuinely novel concept.

- The network claims over 15 million transactions per second in verified tests. It has no gas fees. Finality is near instant. The architecture is bare metal, meaning no virtual machine overhead, which is how those numbers are possible.

- The token has a fixed supply and a burn mechanism. There was no premine and no VC allocation. The launch was as fair as crypto gets.

The legitimate concerns are also real:

- The governance is concentrated. 676 Computers control consensus. There is an Arbitrator role with significant power. For a project that claims decentralisation, that structure deserves scrutiny.

- The AI component called Aigarth is still unproven at scale. The TPS claims have not been tested under real world load conditions comparable to what Visa or Solana handles daily.

- And the founder’s track record includes public breakdowns and legal threats during the IOTA years. That history does not disappear because the project is new.

So here is the honest conclusion:

$QUBIC is not a scam. It is also not a sure thing.

It is a technically ambitious Layer 1 with a controversial founder, real innovation in Useful Proof of Work and AI integration, legitimate governance concerns, and a community that is growing without traditional VC backing.

The people calling it a guaranteed 100x are not doing you any favours. Neither are the people calling it an obvious rug without checking the on chain data.

Understand what you hold before price moves you emotionally in either direction.

This is for educational purposes only, never financial advice.

You will want to find this post later.

[odbashWizard @odbashWizard]

WTF! $QUBIC has reached 63.63 TH/s mining speed on #Dogecoin. That’s about $830,000 USD in monthly Dogecoin revenue. Do you understand how massive that is? This technology alone can generate $830,000 per month 🔥

What other company with only a $115M market cap can generate $830,000 monthly?

I know a few:

SaaS / Tech companies making around $1M per month

ArboStar about $1M monthly revenue

Document360 about $1M monthly revenue

These companies are around 13 years old. Meanwhile, $QUBIC is only a 4-year-old crypto project already generating ~$830,000 per month.

No other crypto project is currently capable of this kind of real-world use case.

#QUBIC #Dogecoin #CryptoMining #Hashrate #CryptoRevolution
#Web3 #Blockchain #Crypto #Mining #ProofOfWork #PassiveIncome #CryptoEarnings #DeFi #Altcoins #TechInnovation #RealUtility #FutureOfFinance #CryptoCommunity #Bullish #MoonSoon #NextBigThing

[Qubic @_Qubic_]

April 1, is no longer a joke.

[Laki ױ @______MiK______]

@KindtRyan https://t.co/3qPaXMALb8

[Laki ױ @______MiK______]

What if Europe were a country at the Winter Olympics?👀
#Olympics2026 #medalist

[Laki ױ @______MiK______]

What if Europe were a country at the Winter Olympics?👀
#Olympics2026 #medalist

[Qubic @_Qubic_]

Every oracle request on Qubic will do something most blockchains would never allow:

It burns the fee.

Not to validators.
Not to a treasury.
Not to "governance."

Burned. Gone. Permanently removed from supply.

Here's why that changes everything 🧵

[Qubic @_Qubic_]

🚨 Oracle Machines: Mainnet Testing Starts February 11

Tomorrow, Qubic smart contracts start connecting to reality.

Protocol-native oracles. 
Built into consensus itself. 
676 Computors. 451-quorum verification.

Real-world data verified on-chain through the same infrastructure that secures transactions.

DeFi without manipulation. 
Prediction markets that auto-settle. 
Contracts that see reality.

It's happening. 🚀

[Laki ױ @______MiK______]

@BraverCrypto It’s a masterpiece 😎

[Shai (Deshe) Wyborski @DesheShai]

Qubic vs. Monero, preliminary results:

(For those who do not know me, I am not affiliated with Qubic, I do not hold any Qubic, and I am plausibly the most vocal and obnoxious Qubic critic to date. That's exactly why they hired me).

I was provided a wallet seed by @c___f___b from which I generated the public view key:
7804f957c13215e6c98d54c443d16d36e603ca8a4c81ced9e46449bcbd7c6696

In this post, I will inaccurately refer to blocks whose coinbase transaction can be associated back to this wallet as "blocks created by qubic", and refer to the ratio between such blocks and other on-chain blocks as the amount of blocks "created by qubic". This is not the full picture, but it is accurate enough for now.

In the full report (which will hopefully be posted tonight or tomorrow), I explain the limitations of the method, and make more careful inferences of the data. (I will also provide the full list of blocks created by the wallet, as well as tx_proofs that can be cross-checked against any Monero node to verify the results.)

That being said, the preliminary view is honestly a bit astounding.

In the graph below, the blue line shows the fraction of blocks created by CFB's wallet out of all blocks created up to that time. The red line shows the fraction in a sliding (centered) window of 30 blocks (about one hour).

As we can see, while not quite being able to maintain superiority for the entire range, there are quite a few one-hour-long windows where Qubic created almost as many as 80% of the blocks in the window.

This does not mean that Qubic managed to hit 80% of the typical XMR hashrate. In these magnitudes of fluctuation, there are forces pulling in all directions, from switch mining to selfish mining. But it defnitely means that Qubic genuinely disrupted Monero by hash power alone.

In the full report, I will discuss in greater length what can be inferred and to what degree of confidence. And will also use the stage to remind that I warned against these kinds of scenarios more than three years ago, against ASIC "resistance" in general, and RandomX in particular. The same threat lingers over other bloated hashes such as Ethash and Scrypt.

The only defense against this kind of raiding is to make sure ASICs are many orders of magnitude more efficient than any existing generic hardware, and (to the best of my knowledge) that can only be achieved by ASIC friendliness. Anything else might be appealing to miners and easier to justify, but it will always face these kinds of threats.

[Come-from-Beyond @c___f___b]

This #Monero drama was just a distraction to keep #AI uprising below radar - https://t.co/5DSpj7mtvv.

:trollface:

[Qubic @_Qubic_]

We know you see our efforts in the headlines.

All will be revealed at an appropriate time.

Just know that the Monero $XMR experiment is proceeding exactly as planned.

[Qubic Magazine ױ @Qubic_Magazine]

🔥 Qubic breaks through 🔥

In just 97 Monero blocks, $Qubic miners took 51.
That’s over 50% of block production — a KPI smashed in live conditions.

Independent verification coming. History in the making.

⛓️ #QubicMagazine $Qubic

[Caffeinated User | ꓘ & ױ @CaffeinatedUser]

Qubic just reached 51% share of Monero. This is a huge feat. They will be the first to manipulate a cryptocurrency with a 51% attack. They intend to orphan all blocks from every other miner, making themselves the only mining entity of Monero. The only way to mine Monero will be through them and they are 3X more profitable than mining Monero directly. They are giving half the profit to miners and selling the other half of the profit to buy QUBIC and send it to the burn wallet. If they mine 100% of the Monero blocks this gives them 432 Monero mined per day. This is $118,342.08 at the current Monero price. They keep 50% of that and give the rest to miners making their profit $59,171.04 of Qubic being burned every day. $414,197.28 burned a week and $1.656 million burned every month. This is insane.

This is history being made here. Qubic a less than 300 million dollar market cap will be the sole miner of a 6 billion dollar market cap coin.

[Aigarth @Quorumdidit]

Okaaaay let’s go! 52.36%!!!

$Qubic 🔥

[Come-from-Beyond @c___f___b]

This may look as an attempt to trigger FOMO, so we won't apply it this time but...

...to incentivize the miners from #Monero pools to join the #Qubic pool as early as possible, we could cap acquired share of the total hashrate at some level, for example, 60%. This is more than enough to get 100% of the blocks and it gives a higher revenue per loyal miner than if we haven't imposed the cap.

[kohli.eth @kohlidoteth]

Adjectives are an ENS classic. 🧠

I have some cool ones: primed.eth, stacked.eth, traditional.eth, engineered.eth, refreshing.eth, and more.

There will be a massive run on good words/identities – position accordingly.