Arlingtonians for Upzoning Transparency

Arlingtonians for Upzoning Transparency [email protected]

[Arlingtonians for Upzoning Transparency @_AFUT]

MMH/EHO - One Candidate So Far Opposed to EHO for County Board Election 2025

County Appeal of EHO Lawsuit Win Moving Forward Using Expensive Outside Counsel https://t.co/1Ew3AZ219v

[Arlingtonians for Upzoning Transparency @_AFUT]

MMH/EHO - What the County’s One-Year EHO Report Didn’t Tell You – EHOs are Not Affordable Housing!!
New EHO Lists for $5,500 Monthly Rent!!
County Files Notice of Appeal
https://t.co/q9D49s7PdZ

[Arlingtonians for Upzoning Transparency @_AFUT]

MMH/EHO - COUNTY BOARD STOP WASTING MONEY ON THE EHO APPEAL - LET THE COUNTY KNOW YOUR FY26 BUDGET PRIORITIES BY JANUARY 8 https://t.co/7iXumkLCLU

[Arlingtonians for Upzoning Transparency @_AFUT]

MMH/EHO - Year End Support for Lawsuit Against Upzoning; Need to Counter County's Appeal

Please consider additional support https://t.co/K2Cunud9C6

[Arlingtonians for Upzoning Transparency @_AFUT]

Taxpayer Dollars for Developers Instead of Helping Those Who Need Housing Assistance?!

Let the County Know Your Views on Its Homeownership Study by December 4
https://t.co/blPNMDAQ5M

[Arlingtonians for Upzoning Transparency @_AFUT]

IT AIN’T OVER ’TIL IT’S OVER – COUNTY VOTES TO APPEAL - PLEASE CONTINUE TO SUPPORT THE LAWSUIT

AND, YET ANOTHER COUNTY HOUSING STUDY https://t.co/5OeGVYe0yD

[Arlingtonians for Upzoning Transparency @_AFUT]

Top 10 Reasons Cty lost #10 Ruling says: "None of the above inconsistencies were brought to the attention of the public at any of the public hearings."

[Arlingtonians for Upzoning Transparency @_AFUT]

Top 10 Reasons Cty lost #1 Judge ruled "Board failed to consider the localized impact of EHO development upon the neighborhoods where EHO housing will be built" and is therefore VOID.

[Arlingtonians for Upzoning Transparency @_AFUT]

Top 10 Reasons Cty lost #9 "Inconsistencies" include that consultant said EHO would be concentrated in certain areas, but Board said it would be spread across the County.

[Arlingtonians for Upzoning Transparency @_AFUT]

@margaretbarthel "Broader impact" of the judge's decision is that Arlington can't make up its own rules to make zoning changes. Follow AFUT to learn more.

[Arlingtonians for Upzoning Transparency @_AFUT]

"Inconsistencies" include that the Board's only EHO consultant tasked with advising what developers would do in Arlington "did not talk to a single developer" re: EHO.

[Arlingtonians for Upzoning Transparency @_AFUT]

County appealing judge's ruling that the "Board failed to consider the localized impact of EHO development upon the neighborhoods where EHO housing will be built" and is therefore VOID.

[Arlingtonians for Upzoning Transparency @_AFUT]

"Inconsistencies" include that the Board's only EHO consultant "was instructed to avoid disagreement with the staff of the county" in their recommendations.