@Musa_Khawula It’s a form of cultural colonisation aimed at us Black people, designed to erode our culture, weaken our values and destroy our families.
Millions are spent on these so-called “progressive” and “liberal” ideologies that are masked as empowerment but are really tools of control.
Technology makes this far more possible than it has ever been.
Instead of teaching a classroom as a single unit, intelligent systems can teach a student individually. They can skip what a student already knows and spend more time where the student is stuck. They can present the same concept from different angles until it clicks.
And they can do it in real time instead of waiting for an exam at the end of the semester to reveal that the student was lost weeks earlier.
The content of the subject doesn’t need to change. What changes is the entry point.
A student who loves basketball could learn fractions through shooting percentages. A student who spends hours building in Minecraft could learn geometry through design and structure.
The concept remains the same. The path to understanding adapts to the learner.
This isn’t something teachers have failed to do. The reality is simply that the numbers make it almost impossible. One teacher managing thirty students cannot realistically personalize instruction for every learning style and pace.
Technology doesn’t have that limitation.
Another thing that’s become obvious is that children are not incapable of focus. They will spend hours mastering complex video games without being told to do so. Those games require strategy, problem-solving, pattern recognition, and persistence.
Then the same child walks into a classroom and struggles to focus for twenty minutes.
That isn’t necessarily a discipline problem. It may simply be a design problem.
Engagement changes everything. When learning becomes interactive and responsive, attention follows naturally.
I also question how much of higher education actually delivers value relative to its cost.
Many students spend four years and accumulate enormous debt, yet a large portion of the practical learning seems to happen in the early stages—or through collaboration with peers rather than through formal instruction.
It raises a difficult but important question.
Are we preserving an educational structure because it is truly the best way to learn, or simply because it is the system we inherited?
The more I look at our education system, the more I realise that our education system was built on a faulty assumption.
The assumption is that every student should learn the same thing, at the same speed, in the same order, at the same time.
School moves students from 5th grade to 6th grade to 7th grade almost like products moving down an assembly line. The system is organized around uniform progression. But human beings don’t actually learn that way.
This model made sense in a factory economy where the goal was standardized inputs and predictable outputs. Education was designed to produce workers who could fit into that system.
But the economy that required that model is largely gone. The assembly line has changed, yet education still runs on its logic.
Think about what happens in a typical classroom.
A student who fully understands algebra in two weeks still has to sit through the next eight weeks because the calendar says so. Another student who is struggling is pulled forward anyway because the class schedule moves on.
Neither student is really being served. Both are simply being processed.
It seems far more logical to allow students to progress at the fastest pace they can handle in each subject. Learning should expand when curiosity and ability are present, not slow down to match a rigid timeline.
X is that platform where some of the dumbest and most ignorant voices in our society get the loudest stage and prove to everyone why they could barely make it past matric. They trying to act like experts on issues they clearly know nothing about.
The obvious result is that, in trying to sound smart, they only end up making a buffoon of themselves.
She’s very welcome, with open arms. However, when she has received Christ, and she remains in that condition, then the problem lies with the church not with her.
When a church is truly rooted in Christ, transformation is inevitable. The Word of God is living and transformative; no one who comes to Christ remains the same.
The testimonies of Mary Magdalene and Legion are evidence enough of that.