American is at Planet Fitness in Wisconsin wearing a jacket in support of ICE
🚨 The Planet Fitness makes him REMOVE the jacket because they say defending your country is “sensitive” (They actually say this on camera)
“Supporting ICE — protecting your country is sensitive?”
“Yes”
“I was wearing an ICE jacket inside of Planet Fitness, and he's telling me I can't do that.”
America has completely lost the plot. So every other country on earth is allowed to have immigration enforcement but America…
Remember Planet Fitness also defends trans men in women’s restrooms
Cancel your Planet Fitness membership
🚨 JUST IN: President Trump gives a HUGE shoutout to Elon Musk for pledging a huge chunk of his OWN SpaceX shares to MILLIONS of American children
We’re talking SEVERAL BILLION dollars worth that’ll be transferred to Trump Accounts.
“This is exactly what was envisioned when we created TRUMP ACCOUNTS — Bringing together the GREAT PRIVATE SECTOR, Elon and so many more, to invest in our children, by far our greatest and most important asset, and give every American Child a piece of the American Dream.” 🇺🇸
🚨THE BIDEN TAPES THEY FOUGHT LIKE HELL TO BURY JUST DROPPED — AND NOW WE KNOW WHY
70 hours of raw audio the Bidens and Democrats spent a fortune trying to keep locked away.
Jesse Watters played the receipts: a full decade ago, while he was still VP, Biden was already a blithering mess who couldn’t even remember the names of his own staff.
This is the cognitive decline they gaslit the entire country about for years. This is why Special Counsel Hur called him a “sympathetic elderly man with a poor memory” to dodge charges. The tapes prove it started way earlier — and they knew.
They covered it. They protected it. They let an incapacitated man sit in the Oval while the media lied to your face.
No more hiding. The truth is out in full.
BREAKING: President Trump stuns the room saying NOTHING will be bigger then the news HE will drop on Thursday when he addresses the nation
“Without free and fair Elections, you don’t have a country”
GET READY 🔥
BREAKING: Tucker Carlson announces he is releasing evidence tomorrow proving the FBI is lying about the assassination attempt on Donald Trump in Butler, Pennsylvania by Thomas Crooks
Joe Rogan and Elon Musk pointed out the INSANE inconsistencies
- The assassins house was PROFESSIONALLY scrubbed
- His home was scrubbed so well there wasn’t even silverware left in the home
- No footprint on the internet
- No social media footprint (completely wiped)
- He was in a BlackRock commercial
- Joe Rogan says some individuals inside BlackRock may have “recognized that it's beneficial to them if he gets assassinated”
- There was never a formal report
- There was never press conferences where they detailed all the information they know currently and where the investigation stands at the moment
- He was a very young g kid there with a rangefinder (used to measure distances, very suspicious)
- CNN streamed it live, which Joe Rogan does not believe they did for any other rally. And certainly not for a rally that's in the middle of nowhere in Pennsylvania
- They wouldn't let people be on that roof because the Secret service lady said it was sloped and it was dangerous
- The snipers that were on the other roof was a, a steeper pitch (It made no f*cking sense)
- Random people saw him and pointed him out on the roof with a gun for a long time before it happened
- The kid had 5 phones
- His body was immediately cremated
- There was some indications that there was a phone that had been traveling from outside the FBI offices in D.C to where this kid lived multiple times
We need answers.
@BabyNetworkNews As President Trump would say, “Nobody’s ever seen anything like it. Nobody! Never, ever! Believe me, folks, it’s unbelievable. Absolutely unbelievable!” 😂😂
How extraordinary. I asked you a perfectly reasonable question seeking clarification as to whether your original remark was directed at me. Your response was an astonishing display of hostility.
You don’t know me from Adam, yet you’ve somehow managed to form a rather bleak assessment of my intelligence without demonstrating much interest in the substance of my argument.
If I may, refresh the lump of coal that is occupying space between your ears, my original remarks concerned the fairness and consistency of using taxpayer funds for student loan forgiveness. That is a legitimate subject for thoughtful debate.
Rather than addressing the merits of that discussion, you’ve chosen profanity and personal insults.
Your indignation is unmistakable; your reasoning, considerably less so.
If you disagree with my position, I welcome a thoughtful rebuttal. But intellectual discourse requires more than indignation masquerading as an argument. Your ability do so, is a sobering thought.
I asked for clarification, not a demonstration of your temperament.
I see little value in continuing an exchange in which civility has been so readily abandoned. I consider this conversation concluded and have no interest in further personal remarks.
Wishing you a lovely evening, and perhaps a moment of reflection on the difference between disagreeing with someone and disparaging them.
We’ve reached a point where some people seem to interpret disagreement as a personal attack, rather than an opportunity for thoughtful conversation.
“The strength of one’s convictions is not measured by the hostility with which they are expressed, but by the reasoning with which they can be defended.” Jana Maureen
Not certain who your retort was addressed to ?
Here is an explanation @SilensMort, that i wrote to Kim who said Biden never gave any money to any college student to repay their loans. “Kim I think you are confusing what the Supreme Court prohibited with what actually happened during Biden’s presidency.
Yes, the Supreme Court blocked Biden’s sweeping student loan forgiveness proposal. However, according to the U.S. Department of Education’s January 16, 2025, report, his administration approved $188.8 BILLION in student loan forgiveness for 5.3 MILLION borrowers.
Those are the Biden administration’s own figures, not political opinions. Millions of Americans did receive relief through federal student loan forgiveness programs.
And as for your prediction that I won’t receive a check, you’ve missed my point entirely.
I don’t need a government check. If such payments were ever authorized, I’d gladly give mine to my daughter, who could genuinely benefit from the financial assistance.
My argument isn’t about personal enrichment. It’s about fairness, the distribution of federal financial relief, and the freedom of Americans to decide how best to use the assistance they receive.
Of course, forgiving existing federal debt and distributing new payments involve different legal authorities. But that doesn’t make a discussion about fairness any less worthwhile.
Kim, we can certainly disagree about public policy. That’s the beauty of a free society. But facts are not interchangeable with opinions, and profanity is no substitute for a well-reasoned argument.
After all, the strength of an argument lies in the quality of its reasoning, not the volume of its indignation.
Wishing you a lovely day.