1/n This photo, now viral on Telegram, appears to show serious mismanagement at a PMC JE exam centre. Despite the issue reportedly being brought to the attention of PMC and the police, is it justified to release the DV list without a thorough investigation? @prajytnair@navalMH
@prajytnair@navalMH 5/5 we are asking for only three things: transparency, a fair investigation, and justice.
Before rushing ahead with the recruitment process, the administration should address these concerns and ensure that every deserving candidate gets a fair opportunity based solely on merit.
@prajytnair@navalMH 4/n 4я╕ПтГг We come from ordinary backgrounds. We do not have the influence, connections, or "settings" that some people may have. Is that our fault?
5я╕Пя┐╜я┐╜я┐╜ Will your future truly become brighter by compromising and playing with our future?
@prajytnair@navalMH 3/n 2я╕ПтГг The officials holding these positions today have themselves gone through competitive examinations. If something similar had happened during your recruitment process, would you have reached the position you hold today? And would you have silently accepted such injustice?
@VinitaDeshmukh@Cockroachisback@RahulGandhi If everything is transparent, why is the result still not being published in the IBPS format? Also, has normalization been applied or not? If yes, which normalization method was used, and why hasn't it been disclosed to candidates yet?
@PMCPune@VijayKumbhar62 Transparency is not just about addressing duplicate names. Why hasn't PMC released the result in the standard IBPS format? Was normalization applied? If yes, which methodology was used? Candidates deserve clear answers on these points as well.
@prajytnair@VijayKumbhar62@PMCPune@navalMH Transparency is not just about addressing duplicate names. Why hasn't PMC released the result in the standard IBPS format? Was normalization applied? If yes, which methodology was used? Candidates deserve clear answers on these points as well.
@prajytnair@VijayKumbhar62@PMCPune@navalMH Transparency is not just about addressing duplicate names. Why hasn't PMC released the result in the standard IBPS format? Was normalization applied? If yes, which methodology was used? Candidates deserve clear answers on these points as well.
26 Duplicate Candidates in PMC exam?
In the results of the Pune Municipal Corporation's Junior Engineer (Civil) recruitment, the names of as many as 26 candidates appear twice. The records show different roll numbers and different reservation categories for these duplicate entries.
Furthermore, while the entire first page of the result document is typed, only the date is handwritten. The signature is not digitally signed but appears to be an image. Additionally, the first page bears the notation "Page No. 31", raising suspicions that the original file may have been altered or tampered with.
Moreover, although the recruitment examination was conducted on three different days, the details of the normalization methodology used for score calculation have not been made public. The fact that the result PDF reportedly displays an editable DOCX file path also raises concerns regarding document management and integrity.
Given these issues, an independent Digital Forensic Audit, Recruitment Process Audit, and technical investigation should be conducted, and all findings should be made public.
@navalMH
#PuneMunicipalCorporation #JuniorEngineerRecruitment #Transparency #DigitalForensicAudit #JusticeForCandidates #26DuplicateCandidates