My wife and I got into it last night about the grocery bill.
I pulled up an old Target order from February 2020.
28 items. $64.50.
Added every single one back to the cart just to see.
$158.30.
Same 28 items. Same store. Same cart.
$93.80 more.
In five years.
We didn’t buy more.
Didn’t upgrade anything.
Didn’t add a single extra item.
Just needed the same things we always needed.
They told us inflation was transitory. They told us it was under control. They told us the economy was strong.
Our cart didn’t get any of those memos.
145% increase in five years.
Not one member of Congress has looked at a grocery receipt in decades.
And it shows.
🚨 AARON RODGERS JUST WENT OFF ON TUCKER CARLSON — AND WHAT HE SAID IS TERRIFYING
NFL quarterback Aaron Rodgers dropped a bombshell on Tucker Carlson.
He warned about the slow creep toward total surveillance: China-style social credit scores, cameras everywhere, and eventually a chip in your hand or total control over your life.
He called out how they’re inching toward 1984 with Ministry of Truth, censorship, and monitoring every aspect of your life.
Rodgers said the “I have nothing to hide” crowd doesn’t understand: they won’t stop with what they’re doing now.
This is the future they want: total obedience through total surveillance.
Is Aaron Rodgers one of the few celebrities willing to say what he really thinks?
A 40-year-old working mom of two just said what a lot of women are quietly thinking after years in the corporate grind:
“I fell for it. Go to college, get the degree, you can have it all — career, kids, the whole thing.
I don’t want to do it all anymore.
I want to take my kids to school, pick them up, be there when they get home, chaperone field trips, volunteer, go to the gym, clean the house, do laundry, cook dinner… just be home.”
She’s blunt: “It’s not worth it. Don’t fall for that sh... Find a way to be with your family.”
It’s raw, honest, and hits different when you hear it from someone who’s lived both sides.
Moms (and dads) — have you ever reached that point where the “have it all” dream started feeling like a trap?
What would your ideal balance actually look like if money or societal pressure wasn’t part of the equation?
Your thoughts 👇
I grow infinitely tired of the first sentence here. I don't know what goes on with the Candace situation, I don't watch podcasts. With that in mind, let me offer you all some sense.
In America, you are innocent until proven guilty. End of story. Anyone making the statement this idiot just made needs to reflect. And yes, it's idiotic, so spare me the self righteous virtue signaling. You do not condemn someone to guilt before seeing the evidence and going through a thorough process to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. This is a human right. So, Kristan, I know you find logic and consequence challenging, evidenced by your failure as a pro life advocate, but bear with me here.
When a high profile political and religious figure, of which Charlie was both, is assassinated, no stone can be left unturned. Everyone close to him, every business relationship, every random quack letter with a threat, EVERYTHING must be investigated.
When this much money, power, and influence are involved, those closest must be met with ultimate scrutiny. Not as accusation, but as thorough investigation.
I find it ridiculous that such common sense must be stated.
As far as the ever obvious clown show arguments, let's put something to bed.
I don't trust our government. I don't trust any other government. When the most influential evangelical Christian on the planet is bankrolled by Jewish influence, which is a completely opposed theology, openly states that Israel is ethnically cleansing GAZA, as in, openly makes accusations of genocide, against the opposing religious influence that bankrolls his existence, one must factor this in. When donors, funding operatives, and world leaders are in the DMs, one must take that into account.
I am not saying Israel killed Charlie. I literally have no idea. I am saying how on earth can you rule any involvement out? Even secondary involvement. You think this is so irrelevant that it doesn't merit investigation? You think screeching "conspiracy" makes you sound rational or well intentioned? It doesn't. It makes you sound like a tone deaf sycophant with no desire for truth. And oppressive, thought policing tyrant.
I also believe that Erika Kirk has acted EXTRAORDINARILY strange in the wake of Charlie's death. Does that mean she killed him? No. Does that even mean something is off? No. People act weird all the time. What it does mean, is taking videos of Charlie in a casket and posting to social media is odd. The interviews are odd, the mannerisms are odd. The behavior is all odd, and there are odd things in the history. And that should ALL be taken into consideration. Again, on what planet is having eyes and ears and opinions on behavior some sort of thought crime?
Again, I haven't even spoken about this topic, and I have no clue who killed Kirk, and indeed I hold no position on it, but I find the shaping of narratives and the silencing of dissent, and the "mis and disinformation" campaigns akin to... COVID? Are you people are completely lost?
Given that this is the biggest political assassination since Kennedy, maybe people should stop being retards and look at the whole picture.
Is it possible some random transgender freak pulled off the greatest hit of our lifetimes? Sure. Is it likely, given the circumstances? Not at all. Trust your government at your own peril.
If you are incapable of having conversations on this topic, maybe sit at the children's table this Thanksgiving.
In closing, you will likely never know who killed Kirk. But someone will fall.
The single LARGEST vaccine–dementia study ever conducted (n=13.3 MILLION) found adult vaccines (flu, pneumococcal, shingles, tetanus, diphtheria, pertussis) increase risk of ALZHEIMER’S (+50%) and DEMENTIA (+38%) for a FULL DECADE.
The MORE doses, the HIGHER your dementia risk.
The Charlie Kirk case shows a pattern of gaps and limited transparency in evidence handling. Prosecutors relied on phone screenshots of texts instead of full carrier tower metadata, timestamps, and location pings. No video of forensic phone extractions. Rear cameras behind Charlie, speakers, and earpiece receiver were never fully turned over for independent analysis, only footage via flash drive. Discovery to the defense was delayed despite early extractions. Body camera footage stopped as an officer reached the roof with only a vague “battery might have died” explanation. No confirmation it was charged the night before, started the day full, or was forensically examined afterward. Charlie’s clothing, necklace, and phone received limited independent scrutiny. Post-event, two companies removed dirt, repaved, and did additional concrete work on the breezeway roof behind Charlie permanently altering the site acoustics and making independent forensic acoustic analysis of the gunshot impossible. The transport ride had no paramedics or medical personnel. Missing bullet fragments were excluded from analysis. DNA was not 100% conclusive and did not definitively place Robinson on the roof at the exact time of the shot. No clear footage exists of the shot itself. Additional issues include the men seen with Robinson’s car who were they and why did they have it? The vehicle in released footage did not match his car, notably lacking the front license plate holder. Questions also remain about who “Nano” from TPUSA spoke with and what was discussed. No official forensic acoustic analysis of the videos appears to have been conducted or presented by the prosecution or defense. All public acoustic work has come from independent researchers, some supporting the official narrative and others raising questions about distance and multiple sources. When physical site changes, equipment failures, incomplete forensics, vehicle discrepancies, and unexamined items stack up this way, public skepticism is rational. Full independent verification should be the standard.
PSA: If you’re more publicly outraged with figures like @RealCandaceO than you ever were about Jeffrey Epstein, and the predator class, you have been programmed perfectly.
Donald Trump named Candace Owens the most vile person of the year.
Not someone from the Epstein Files.
Not someone starting unnecessary wars killing innocent people.
Not someone who rapes and kills.
Just someone who questions the narrative they push.
Makes you wonder.
Extremely grateful for my time at McClintock. I leave the school with
1544 total points
537 total assists
3x all region first team
1x all region 2nd team
2x all city
AGTG