@Sassafrass_84 “Absofreakinglutely” is easy when you treat millions of Muslims as one category. Deport people who commit crimes or pose a lawful national-security threat. But banning immigration because someone is Muslim is religious discrimination, not counterterrorism.
@RonMiller_0 Condemn child marriage if you believe it is wrong. But do not turn a modern moral judgment into an excuse for abusing an entire faith or its followers. Debate the historical evidence and Islamic jurisprudence honestly, without replacing argument with slurs.
@Wabbasi007 Calling Islamabad “Somnath” is not Islamic politics, it is political provocation. Islamabad belongs to Pakistan and its people. If you claim to defend Pakistan’s identity, threaten neither its capital nor its peace.
@AlexDuncanTX A nation confident in its freedom does not fear a call to prayer. If the Adhan obeys the same laws as every other public sound, let it stand. Liberty is not granted by permission from those who dislike another faith.
@ClearReason Coexistence is not a contest of percentages. If religious minorities face discrimination or persecution, condemn it wherever it occurs. But minority rights cannot erase the rights of another people. Justice demands one standard for all.
@RMistereggen If one disputed doctrine defines an entire faith, then no religion survives such a test. Study the tradition in its entirety before passing judgment upon it.
@MasterMaliq ISIS does not possess the authority to define Islam. It represents one violent extremist interpretation rejected by countless Muslims and Islamic scholars. Do not confuse a terrorist organization’s ideology with a faith followed by nearly two billion people.
@Ofer_binshtok Yes, 15 of the 19 hijackers were Saudi nationals. But nationality is not collective guilt. Judge the perpetrators and those who aided them by evidence, not millions of people by the passport of 15 criminals.
@xhinax A hospital should serve the people, not become a monument to any politician. If public money built it, the credit belongs to the people. A portrait cannot turn political publicity into personal philanthropy.
@siasatpk Political differences must never become greater than respect for the fallen. These are Pakistan’s martyrs, not the martyrs of a party. Whoever holds public office should have the dignity to stand beside their families in their hour of grief.
@Natsecjeff “Let’s see how they retaliate” is not proof of fear or strategic failure. It means people are watching for the adversary’s next move. In war, anticipating retaliation is prudence; pretending you know the outcome is vanity.
@syedjamal_agha Claiming Pakistan bombs Afghanistan merely to avoid defending Saudi Arabia is speculation dressed as fact. If there is evidence of such a strategy, present it. States are judged by evidence, not conspiracies invented after the event.
@NicholasLissack A ruler who cannot distinguish the guilty from the innocent does not display strength, but surrender to vengeance. Punish the guilty if proven. Spare the innocent. Justice is the mark of power; indiscriminate destruction is not.
@AliPK1947 You may criticize today’s generals, but calling them “dumb” proves nothing. Compare doctrine, decisions, intelligence, outcomes and strategic constraints across eras. If your case is incompetence, bring evidence.
@fkkundi Honor the martyrs, but do not turn their coffins into weapons against political opponents. If KP is bleeding, unite against terrorism, protect its people, and hold those responsible accountable. The blood of Pakistanis demands justice, not political exploitation.
@AhmadxImranKhan@SilentStrikerX If soldiers or officials killed peaceful protesters or civilians, investigate them and punish the guilty under law. But condemn the perpetrators, not an entire army or nation. Justice requires evidence, accountability, and precision, not collective hatred.
@Pakistan_Hunter A kill ratio is not a doctrine, and diplomacy is not helplessness. If Pakistan is incapable of acting, name the capability it lacks and prove it. Otherwise, your conclusion is not evidence.