@Word2013screen@TheOzmerican Ah, half Australian? Is that how it works?
Now do the same with a 1/16 Aboriginal, tell them they are 15/16 not Aboriginal.
@Dexerto However, no guidelines are needed here; everything is just fine. Clothing, camera angles, and decency are all perfect.
They only want to ban nice things.
The Hidden Risks Behind Labor’s Push to Merge Superannuation and Social Security.
Australia is being told to view the proposed merger of superannuation and Centrelink as a bold reform; a modernisation of retirement policy, a streamlining of welfare, a clever administrative fix. But that framing is the sugar‑coating. The reality underneath is far more consequential and far more dangerous for ordinary Australians.
Superannuation isn’t just a single pool of money held by a handful of large funds. It includes every pension scheme in the country: police, firefighters, ambulance officers, teachers, public servants; the backbone of Australia’s essential workforce. All of these funds sit under the same legislative umbrella. And once they are folded into a Centrelink‑controlled system, the government gains something it has never had before: direct access to the retirement savings of millions of Australians.
This proposal is not about efficiency. It is not about modernisation. It is about access: access to money that was never the government's to touch.
Under the model being floated, Centrelink would determine how much of your own savings you are permitted to withdraw. The ATO would automatically apply taxes before you ever see the money. And at the end of the financial year, you would be left to claw back whatever portion the system decides you’re entitled to reclaim. The independence Australians have always had over their retirement savings would evaporate.
Worse still, your home, the equity you’ve spent decades building, becomes another variable in the welfare equation. A private asset becomes a public lever.
And what does this unlock for the government?
A vast reservoir of funds that can be quietly redirected into immigration programs, housing schemes, and support for new arrivals, all without raising taxes or justifying new spending to voters. It is a redistribution pipeline disguised as “retirement reform.”
This is not the Australian Dream. It is Labor’s version of it; a version where your lifetime savings, your pension, and even your home are repurposed as tools for government policy rather than assets you control.
Australians deserve a retirement system that protects their independence, not one that absorbs their hard‑earned savings into bureaucracy. They deserve transparency, not a structural overhaul that masks fiscal opportunism behind the language of reform. And they deserve a government that respects the boundary between public welfare and private retirement, a boundary that exists for a reason. And, potentially, opens the door to another untapped resource, annual personal property taxes.
The stakes are enormous. This proposal isn’t just a policy shift. It’s a redefinition of ownership, responsibility, and the social contract itself.
The question to voters is this: Will you vote for Labor and allow this to happen, and if they do force through these communist laws, seize your superannuation, and give it to Centerlink to distribute, what will you do about it?