ODESZA: Register for Presale Access to our July 27th show in Los Angeles & WIN A Meet & Greet, VIP Tickets + Signed Album!: https://t.co/VKNZ08VcDR
The group whos project was “Fake News in Social Media” made me think that has the increase in technicology simultaneously increased the amount of fake news? #RHUB100
It was evident that each group that presented on Wednesday, did not find much credible information on the authors, gaining no ethos which hurt the article’s trustworthiness. We have talked about logos, ethos, and pathos since the beginning of the semester. #RHUB100
Gray's article further emphasizes that the confusion with facts has been a problem beginning with our ancestors, which explains why people believed the earth was flat. It is hard to know what the truth is when we live in complex societies https://t.co/1X4rvesiby #RHUB100
In Soll's article, I was intrigued by how certain stories can blowup and have some much publicity but a similar story does not get as much attention. What makes certain stories more enticing to readers? #RHUB100
@OglesbyBella I think Bella bring up a good point. People in society do not like to be wrong, therefore this makes them believe their own truths #RHUB100
In the article, "Why We Believe Alternative Facts" by Kristen Weir, she mentions that when the fact is unfavorable we are more prone to not believe it which adds to Anderson agruement that it is easier for us to believe a fantasy. #RHUB100
Anderson uses many anecdotal storis in relation to how people now are less likely to believe the facts and reason with fantasy which strengthens his argument because its easy for the reader to understand #RHUB100
In both articles, the author was trying convince the reader that aliens are not realistic especially because there was no evidence to back it up, “I could spend all week trying to counteract every incorrect assertion.” #RHUB100
@LaineyStiefvat1 I think this is a good point! Carr uses different mathematicians and scientists with credible opinions to further his argument. He does not mention the opposing side because it would weaken his argument.
Carr’s article is in the first point of view which is effective because the tone is more relatable for the reader. He also includes information from respectable, educated people like Alan Turing, Joseph Weizenbaum, and Lewis Mumford which creates a stronger argument. #RHUB100
In Anderson’s agrueement he has a strong opionion of how society has not changed in the last 20 years. It is not evident who the intended audience was or what he was trying to change our opinion about, I think his agrueement is weak.
@andydyerr Andy brings up a good question! People reading different agruments is good to get different perspectives but after reading them, we should than create our opinion from the ideas we read. #RHUB100