@Rajiv1841 इसमें सबसे ज्यादा कोसना चाहिए जय शाह को। सदन में बाप पाकिस्तान के विरुद्ध नारा लगातार जए और बेटा ICC chairman होने के नाते हर समय भारत और पाकिस्तान को एक ही ग्रुप में रख देता है।
Dear @scroll_in@tajmahalfoxtrot and @sharmasupriya, what kind of third-rate, malicious and deeply misogynistic journalism is this?
Pallavi Joshi is a four National Award-winning actor. She started acting at the age of four. She had already become one of India’s most recognised television stars at a time when many of the journalists writing this story weren’t even born.
I didn’t even know the P of production when Pallavi produced Arohan, a landmark work centred on women in the Indian Navy. She has produced and created more meaningful work than your collective reports ever will.
And yet, when you write about an accomplished, self-made woman, you choose to introduce her primarily as “the wife of filmmaker Vivek Agnihotri.”
Why?
Because apparently a woman’s own achievements are still not enough to establish her identity.
This is precisely how patriarchy works. Reduce a woman with decades of independent achievement to the man she happens to be married to.
Pallavi Joshi did not borrow her identity from anyone. She built it herself through four decades of acting, producing, television, cinema and an extraordinary body of work. She has never needed to compromise with mediocrity, fashion herself around a powerful surname, or seek validation through a husband.
If you cannot acknowledge an accomplished independent woman on her own terms and instead feel compelled to define her through her husband, then perhaps the problem isn’t Pallavi Joshi. Perhaps it is your own deeply patriarchal lens.
And @sharmasupriya, as someone who otherwise positions herself as a feminist, I am genuinely surprised that you would encourage, defend or allow such a headline merely for a few additional views. Feminism cannot be selective. It has to apply even when the woman in question is inconvenient to your narrative.
Here is what the headline could have said:
“Pallavi Joshi, four-time National Award-winning actor who played Kasturba in Shyam Benegal’s The Making of the Mahatma, revolutionised Indian television with some of its most successful shows, delivered a memorable antagonist in #TheKashmirFiles, championed human rights, produced meaningful cinema, and is a mother of two, also married to filmmaker Vivek Agnihotri.”
See the difference?
One headline tells you who she is.
The other tells you whose wife she is.
That difference is not journalism. It is patriarchy masquerading as journalism.
The Series cup is huge, ofc. But look at the background. No pan bahar hoardings at Delhi’s Kotla.
ACB are about to expose BCCI broadcasting standards tomorrow at the Capital.
The cricket boards of Scotland and the Netherlands have criticised the recent changes to the Cricket World Cup structure ⚠️
They say the changes are a “setback” for Associate nations and “risk undermining” the progress made towards globalising the game 🌎❌
The beauty of this movie is that it was released during Congress era and it showed a saffron party accused of defense procurement scam.
And then the party goes ahead to lathi charge peaceful protestors at India gate!
Reality is: Bofors and MIG procurement happened under Congress govt and it was Congress govt that lathi charges peaceful protestors at India Gate in 2012!
It was one of the biggest propaganda movies ever made!
Because in Anna Hazare's hunger strike:
- No politicians were invited.
- So-called comedians did not come to raise anti-Hindu slogans in the name of a hunger strike.
- Neither was the Pakistani song Bas naam rahega Allah ka sung.
- Nor were slogans raised in support of Umar Khalid, who claims Kashmir is occupied by India.
- Neither Jai Bheem groups nor JNU students were allowed.
Anna Hazare's protest was a pure protest that was solely for the welfare of the people, not for political gain.
🚨 SHOCKING CLAIMS by Former MHA Under Secretary R.V.S. Mani:
— "26/11 was a fixed match between Congress & ISI"
— "Had Kasab not been caught alive, 26/11 would be called Hindu Terror"
— "Modi & Amit Shah were targets in Ishrat Jahan case"
@BefittingFacts तुम रायता विंगर भी बहुत दोगले हो। जब कियारा आडवाणी पर प्रश्न उठ रहे हैं तब चुंबन नहीं निकली। लेकिन आ गए पुरुष रक्षा आंदोलन करने।
बोलना है तो दोनों को बोलो नहीं तो बचाव दोनों का करो। बीच में अटक के ही जड़े मत बनो।
भारतीय समाज सबसे बड़ा दोगला है। इनको वो पुरुष नहीं दिखेंगे। ये दोगले कुत्ते केवल महिलाओं को ही बोलते हैं जैसे वो जो भी कर रही है वो हवा के साथ कर रही है।
It's such a shame. Being married and having a child, yet still choosing to do such bold scenes for money. Not even thinking about how your own family might feel or what they might have to face because of it. I genuinely feel sorry for his wife. Shame on yash 🤢
It's such a shame. Being married and having a child, yet still choosing to do such bold scenes for money. Not even thinking about how your own family might feel or what they might have to face because of it. I genuinely feel sorry for his wife. Shame on yash 🤢
So since when did Maa Kali become "Bangaliyon ki Devi" only?
What's wrong with these incel MRA clowns? They're so classless that they've gone from targeting Indian Hindu women to disrespecting the Hindu goddess Maa Kali as well.
But where are all the self proclaimed "alpha," "sigma," and "men's rights" warriors on X now?
Indian men shame women for having consensual sex more than they shame other men for rape. You'll call a girl 'characterless' for sleeping with 3 guys but stay silent when your friend rapes someone.
A girl with body count? 'Rand!'. A man who rapes? 'Boys will be boys'.
You don't hate rape — you hate women having freedom.